Transfer and Transfer Studies

Susanne Göpferich
Gießen University

Table of contents

In Translation Studies there is no unified concept of transfer. What distinguishes transfer concepts from concepts of translation, however, is that ‘translation’ is frequently, but not necessarily, seen as a more constrained mode of transfer associated with equivalence or invariance requirements (see e.g., Koller 1992). In contrast, transfer concepts include, apart from translations in a narrower sense, transformations of texts and other media produced with a functionalist objective, i.e., with the intention of obtaining a target text or medium that fulfils specific functions for its audience in the target culture, rather than the criterion of invariance in relation to the source material. The results of transfer also include target texts or media whose functions differ from those of their source material. Transfers in which a variance requirement leads the hierarchy of target-text requirements have frequently been termed adaptations or versions. To what extent the concepts of translation and transfer overlap, however, depends on the paradigm of translation theory from which one starts. Over the last 60 years, the scope of Translation Studies has expanded continually bringing the concept of translation closer to the more encompassing concept of transfer. For a detailed description of this expansion and its implications for the resulting translation concepts, see Göpferich (2007).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Antos, Gerd
2001“Transferwissenschaft. Chancen und Barrieren des Zugangs zu Wissen in Zeiten der Informationsflut und der Wissensexplosion.” In Wissenstransfer zwischen Experten und Laien. Umriss einer Transferwissenschaft, Sigurd Wichter & Gerd Antos (eds), 3–33. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar
1990“Translation and Transfer.” Polysystem Studies, Poetics Today 11 (1): 73–78. Crossref logo  TSBGoogle Scholar
2003“Culture Repertoire and Transfer.” In Translation Translation, Susan Petrilli (ed.), 425–431. New York: Rodopi.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Göpferich, Susanne
1998Interkulturelles Technical Writing: Fachliches adressatengerecht vermitteln. Tübingen: Narr.  TSBGoogle Scholar
2007“Translation Studies and Transfer Studies: A plea for widening the scope of Translation Studies.” In Doubts and Direction in Translation Studies, Yves Gambier, Miriam Shlesinger & Radegundis Stolze (eds), 27–39. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins  BoP. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
2008Translationsprozessforschung: Stand – Methoden – Perspektiven. Translationswissenschaft 4. Tübingen: Narr.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1959“On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In On Translation, Reuben A. Brower (ed.), 232–238. New York: Oxford University Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Koller, Werner
1992Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg, Wiesbaden: Quelle & Meyer.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lefevere, André
1992Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London & New York: Routledge.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Mittelstraß, Jürgen
1998Die Häuser des Wissens. Wissenschaftstheoretische Studien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony
1992Translation and Text Transfer. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Weissbrod, Rachel
2004“From Translation to Transfer”. Across Languages and Cultures 5 (1): 23–41. Crossref logo  TSBGoogle Scholar

Further reading

Reiß, Katharina & Vermeer, Hans J
1984Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref logo  BoPGoogle Scholar