Leadership and managing conflict in meetings

Janet Holmes and Meredith Marra

Abstract

There is extensive literature describing the characteristics of a good leader in the area of organisational communication and business management. However, the research tends to be based on secondary, survey or reported data, typically interviews and questionnaires. Moreover, the predominant image of a “good” leader tends to be a charismatic, inspirational, decisive, authoritative, ‘hero’. The Language in the Workplace database provides a large corpus of authentic spoken interaction which allows examination of how effective leaders behave in a wide range of face-to-face interactions at work, and identifies a diverse range of leadership styles. The analysis reveals that effective leaders select from a range of strategies available to challenge, contest or disagree with others, paying careful attention to complex contextual factors, including the type of interaction, the kind of community of practice or workplace culture in which they are operating, and the relative seriousness of the issue involved. The analysis identifies four distinct strategies which leaders use to deal with potential conflict. These strategies lie along a continuum from least to most confrontational: Conflict avoidance; diversion; resolution through negotiation; and resolution by authority. The findings suggest that good leaders “manage” conflict: i.e. they choose strategies which address both their transactional and relational goals in order to achieve a desirable outcome.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Alvesson, Mats, and Yvonne Due Billing
(1997) Understanding gender and organizations. Sage: London.Google Scholar
Beck, Dominique M
(1999) Managing discourse, self and others: Women in senior management positions. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Western Sydney, Nepean.
Brewer, Neil, Patricia Mitchell, and Nathan Weber
(2002) Gender role, organizational status, and conflict management styles. International journal of conflict management 13,1.1: 78-94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
(1978) Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-289.Google Scholar
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven
(2002) Disagreements and third parties: Dilemmas of neutralism in panel news interviews. Journal of pragmatics 34: 1385-1402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer Judith
(1993) The business communication handbook. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
(1999) New generalizations and explanation in language and gender research. Language in Society: Special Issue: Communities of Practice in Language and Gender Research 28: 185-201. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Joyce
(1999) Disappearing acts. Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, and Deborah Terry
(1996) Communication, leadership and organisational change. In K. Parry (ed.), Leadership research and practice. Emerging themes and new challenges. South Melbourne, Vic.: Pitman, pp. 153-161.Google Scholar
Gross, Michael A, and Laura K. Guerrero
(2000) Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim’s organizational conflict styles. International journal of conflict management 11.3: 200-226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hede, Andrew
(2001) Integrated leadership: Multiple styles for maximal effectiveness. In K. Parry (ed.), Leadership in the antipodes: Findings, implications and a leader profile. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies Centre for the Study of Leadership, pp. 6-21.Google Scholar
Heifertz, Ronald
(1998) Values in leadership. In G. Robinson Hickman (ed.), Leading organizations. Perspectives for a new era. London: Sage, pp. 343-356.Google Scholar
Helgesen, Sally
(1990) The female advantage. Women’s way of leadership. New York: Doubleday Currency.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
(2002) The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of pragmatics 34: 1427-1446. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
(2000) Women at work: Analysing women’s talk in New Zealand workplaces. Australian review of applied linguistics (ARAL) 22. 2: 1-17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Rose Fillary
(2000) Handling small talk at work: Challenges for workers with intellectual disabilities. International journal of disability, development and education 47: 273-291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
(2002a) Having a laugh at work: How humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of pragmatics 34: 1683-1710. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2002b) Humour as a discursive boundary marker in social interaction. In A. Duszak (ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 377-400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in press) Relational practice in the workplace: Women’s talk or gendered discourse? (To appear in Language in Society) Crossref
Holmes, Janet, and Miriam Meyerhoff
(1999) The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. In J. Holmes (ed.), Language in society: special issue: Communities of practice in language and gender research 28: 173-183. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
(2001) Managing conflict at work. Paper presented at AAAL Conference, St Louis, February 2001.
(2003a) “Feminine” workplaces: Stereotype and reality. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (eds.), The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 573-599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003b) Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Jackson, Brad, and Ken Parry
(2001) The hero manager: Learning from New Zealand’s top Chief Executives. Auckland: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott
(2002) Maintaining neutrality in third-party dispute mediation. Journal of pragmatics 34: 1403-1426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kakavá, Christina
(2002) Opposition in Modern Greek discourse. Journal of pragmatics 34: 1537-1568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kangasharju, Helena
(2002) Alignment in disagreement. Journal of pragmatics 34: 1447-1472. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Anita
(2002) Negation prosody in British English. Journal of pragmatics 34: 1473-1494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marra, Meredith
(2003) Decisions in New Zealand business meetings. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
forthcoming) Leadership and decision-making style: Rubberstamping vs. pass-the-parcel decisions.
Morris, Michael W., Katherine Y. Williams, Kwok Leung, and Richard Larrick
(1998) Conflict management style: Accounting for cross-national differences. Journal of international business studies 29.4: 729-747. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parry, Ken
(ed.) (2001) Leadership in the antipodes: findings, implications and a leader profile. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies Centre for the Study of Leadership.Google Scholar
Proctor-Thomson, Sarah, and Ken Parry
(2001) What the best leaders look like. In K. Parry (ed.), Leadership in the antipodes: Findings, implications and a leader profile. Wellington: Institute of Policy Studies Centre for the Study of Leadership, pp. 166-191.Google Scholar
Rahim, Afzalur, and Thomas V. Bonoma
(1979) Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological reports 44: 1325-1344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Amanda
(1998) Doing leadership differently. Gender, power and sexuality in a changing business culture. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne
(1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yaegar-Dror, Malcah
(2002) Introduction. Journal of pragmatics 34: 1333-1343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar