Topical and sequential backlinking in a French radio phone-in program: Turn shapes and sequential placements

Elwys De Stefani and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher


Drawing on a corpus of French radio phone-in confidential chats, this paper deals with the resources that participants recurrently employ to get back to a prior course of action following age-inquiry sequences. It might be expected that the age sequence occurs predominantly during the initial, opening part of the phone-call, as part of the caller’s identification sequence. Although such occurrences can be found, the age sequence is produced overwhelmingly after the introduction of the reason for call or after a pre- announcement of it. The way in which participants link back to the activity preceding the age sequence is related to the sequential placement of the age sequence as well as to the ‘authorship’ of its initiation and termination. Backlinking turns may therefore be analyzed with respect to their pragmatic effects (as doing restart, continuation, disjunction etc.) and with regard to the syntax and the linguistic units that speakers employ to achieve these effects.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Ashby, William J
(1988) The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left and right dislocations in French. Lingua 75.2-3: 203-229. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Button, Graham, & Neil Casey
(1984) Generating topic: The use of topic initial elicitors. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167-190.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(2004) Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. Ford (eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies of phonetics and prosody for conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 335-376. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen W
(1997) Form and function of the discourse marker 'anyway': Implications for discourse analysis. Linguistics 35: 343-378. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Richard, & William Housley
(2002) Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorical flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse & Society 13.5 579-602. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, & Sandra A. Thompson
(2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C.E. Ford, B.A. Fox, & S.A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14-38.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald
(1994) Right dislocation and self-repair. In The pragmatics of discourse anaphora in English: Evidence from conversational repair. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 89-124. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299-345.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
(1994) Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design . Language in society 23: 1-29. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth, & Paul Drew
(2005) Figurative pivots: The use of figurative expressions in pivotal topic transitions. Research on language and social interaction 38.1: 35-61.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie, & Gabrielle Müller
(2005) L'implication de la dislocation à droite dans l'organisation interactionnelle. In S. Pekarek Doehler & M.-J. Béguelin (eds.), Grammaire, discours, interaction. La structuration de l'information (=Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique 41: 127-145.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
(2006) Media talk: Conversation analysis and the study of broadcasting. Glasgow: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1972) Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp. 294-338.Google Scholar
(1984) On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J.M. Maxwell & J. Heritage (ed.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191-222.Google Scholar
Korolija, Natascha, & Per Linell
(1996) Episodes: Coding and analyzing coherence in multiparty conversation. Linguistics 34.4: 799-831. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
(2001) Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1050-1078.Google Scholar
(2004) On the interaction of information structure and formal structure in constructions. The case of French right-detached comme-N. In M. Friedman & J.-O. Östman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp.157-199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Local, John
(1992) Continuing and restarting. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 272-296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Getting back to prior talk. and-uh(m) as a back-connecting device in British and American English. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C.E. Ford (eds.), Sound patterns in interaction. Cross- linguistic studies from conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Company, pp. 377-401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie, & Mike Huiskes
(2001) Dutch 'but' as a sequential conjunction. In M. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 141-169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., E.A. Schegloff, & Sandra A. Thompson
(eds.) (1996) Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.53-55. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M
(1975) Second assessments: A study of some features of agreements/disagreements. Dissertation: University of California Irvine.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69.Google Scholar
(1992) Lectures on conversation. G. Jefferson (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4: 696-735. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
(1980) Preliminaries to preliminaries: "Can I ask you a question?" Sociological inquiry 50.3-4: 104-152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) On the organization of sequences as a source of "coherence" in talk-in- interaction. In B. Dorval (ed.), Conversational organization and its development. Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 52-77.Google Scholar
(1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff & S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53-133. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A
(2001) Conversation Analysis: A project in process – increments. Forum lecture delivered at the LSA Linguistic Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., & Harvey Sacks
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 8: 289-327. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Walker, Gareth
(2004) On some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turns in talk-in interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C.E. Ford (eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 147-169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar