Politeness and other types of facework: Communicative and social meaning in a television panel discussion

Nieves Hernández-Flores

Abstract

TV-panel discussions constitute a communicative genre with specific features concerning the situational context, the communicative goals, the roles played by the participants and the acts that are carried out in the interaction. In the Spanish TV-debate Cada día, discourse is characterized as semi-institutional because of having both institutional characteristics – due to its mediatic nature – and conversational characteristics. In the communicative exchanges the social situation of the participants is negotiated by communicative acts, that is, facework is realised. Facework concerns the speakers’ wants of face, both the individual face and the group face. In the present article face is described in cultural terms within the general face wants autonomy and affiliation and in accordance with the roles the speakers assume in interaction. In the analysis of an excerpt from the TV-debate Cada día two types of facework are identified: On the one hand politeness, that is, when an attempted balance between the speaker’s and the addressees’ face is aimed at and, on the other hand, self-facework, which appears when only the speaker’s face is focused on. No samples of the third case of facework, impoliteness, are found in this excerpt. The results of the analysis display the relationship between the communicative purposes of this communicative genre (to inform, to entertain and to convince people of political ideas) and the types of facework (politeness, self-facework) that are identified in the analysed data.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Albelda Marco, Marta
(2004) Cortesía en diferentes situaciones comunicativas. La conversación coloquial y la entrevista sociológica semiformal. In D. Bravo and A. Briz (eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 109-134.Google Scholar
Arundale, Robert
(2005) Face as relational and interactional: A communicative framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2.2: 193-216.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
(2003) Face and politeness: New (insights) or old (concepts). Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1453-1469. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bernal, María
(2005) Hacia una categorización sociopragmática de la cortesía, descortesía y anticortesía en conversaciones españolas de registro coloquial. In D. Bravo (ed.), Estudios de la (des)cortesía en español. Categorías conceptuales y aplicaciones a corpora orales y escritos. Buenos Aires: Dunken, pp. 365-398.Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis
(2003) ’Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad, señor González’: Form and function of politic verbal behaviour in face-to-face Spanish political debates, Discourse and Society 14.4: 395-423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boretti, Susana
(2003) Tests de hábitos sociales y la investigación de la cortesía. In D. Bravo (ed.), Actas del primer Coloquio del Programa Edice. Stockholm: University of Stockholm, pp. 198-210. www​.edice​.orGoogle Scholar
g
Boretti, Susana
(2005) ¿Actividad de imagen vs actividad de cortesía? El desarmador como estrategia interaccional. In J. Murillo (ed.), Actas del II Coloquio del Programa EDICE. San José de Costa Rica: University of Costa Rica, pp. 209-220. www​.edice​.orgGoogle Scholar
Bravo, Diana
(1996) La risa en el regateo: Estudio sobre el estilo comunicativo de negociadores. Stockholm: Institutionen för spanska och portugisiska.Google Scholar
(1998)  Face y rol social: Eficiencia comunicativa en encuentros entre hablantes nativos y no nativos de español”. REALE9-10: 11-41.Google Scholar
(1999) ¿Imagen positiva vs. imagen negativa? Pragmática socio-cultural y componentes de face . Oralia 2: 155-184.Google Scholar
(2002) Actos asertivos y cortesía: Imagen del rol en el discurso académico argentino. In M.E. Placencia and D. Bravo (eds.), Actos de habla y cortesía en español. London: Lincom Studies in Pragmatics 5: 141-174.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio
(2004) Cortesía verbal codificada y cortesía verbal interpretada en la conversación. In D. Bravo and A. Briz (eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 67-93.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
(1987) Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ron
(2001) Self-politeness: A proposal. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 87-106. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Contreras, Josefa
(2005): El uso de la cortesía y las sobreposiciones en las conversaciones. Un análisis contrastivo alemán-español. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
(2005) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link . Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35-72.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Kadt, Elizabeth
(1998) The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 173-191. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1961) Encounters. Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Londres: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
(1967) Interactional ritual: Essays on facetoface behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hernández-Flores, Nieves
(1999) Politeness ideology in Spanish colloquial conversations: The case of advice. Pragmatics 9.1: 37-49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002)  La cortesía en la conversación española de familiares y amigos; la búsqueda del equilibrio entre la imagen del hablante y la imagen del destinatario . Aalborg: Institut for Sprog Internationale Kurturstudier, Aalborg Universitet, vol. 37.Google Scholar
(2004a) La cortesía como la búsqueda del equilibrio de la imagen social. In D. Bravo and A. Briz (eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 95-108.Google Scholar
(2004b) Politeness as ‘face’ enhancement: An analysis of Spanish conversations between friends and family. In R. Márquez Reiter and M.E. Placencia (eds.), Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 265-284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006a) La cortesía como búsqueda del equilibrio de la imagen social: La oscilación de la imagen en un debate televisivo. In J. Murillo (ed.), Actas del II Coloquio del Programa EDICE, San José: Universidad de Costa Rica, pp. 37-52, www​.edice​.org.Google Scholar
(2006b) Actividades de autoimagen, cortesía y descortesía: Tipos de actividades de imagen en un debate televisivo. In J.L. Blas Arroyo et al.. , (eds.), Discurso y Sociedad: Contribuciones al estudio de la lengua en contexto social. Castellón: Universitat Jaume I, pp. 637-648.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
(2001) Semi-institutional discourse: The case of talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 209- 254. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
(1998) Approaching Dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts
(2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9-33.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
(2007) (Im)politeness and the Spanish media: The case of audience participation debates. In M.E. Placencia and C. García (eds.), Research on Politeness in the Spanish Speaking World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 145-166.Google Scholar
Luckman, Thomas
(1995) Interaction planning and intersubjective adjustment of perspectives by communicatives genres. In E. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175-186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Ardith
(1995) Passages of Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 24.4: 391-392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mao, LuMing Robert
(1994) Beyond politeness threory: Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 451-486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murillo Medrano, Jorge
(2006) Significados de la cortesía lingüística a a partir de la aplicación de un test de hábitos sociales en Costa Rica. In J. Murillo (ed.), Actas del II Coloquio del Programa EDICE, San José: Universidad de Costa Rica, pp. 116-136, www​.edice​.orgGoogle Scholar
Placencia, María Elena
(1996) Politeness in Ecuadorian Spanish. Multilingua 15.1: 13-34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruhi, Sükriye
(2006) Politeness in compliment responses. Pragmatics 16.1: 43-101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
(1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella
(1994) (ed.) The challenge of facework. New York: State University of New York.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tusón Valls, Amparo
(1997) Análisis de la conversación. Barcelona: Ariel Practicum.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J
(1992) Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behaviour: Reconsidering claims for universality”. In R.J. Watts, S. Ide and K. Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 43-69.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar