Imperatives and commitments in Romanian academic meeting interactions

Adina Ioana Velea


Romanian imperatives may include different constructions that do not necessarily entail an imperative verb, such as the subjunctive and the indicative mood, interjections or elliptical formats. This study focuses on the ‘bare’ imperative turns-at-talk by applying the methodology of conversation analysis on a corpus consisting of naturally occurring academic meeting interactions. It shows how the imperative expresses actions that display no contingency or difficulty in managing them due to the existence of mainly prior explicit commitments (suggestions, proposals, agreements, previous allocated tasks) that entitle the speakers to use the imperative form in order to direct their recipients. Moreover, it shows how the turn including an imperative verb may also represent a simultaneous commitment, more explicitly an offer that accounts for the lack of contingencies and makes relevant the use of the imperative form within the context of Romanian academic meeting interactions.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
(2010) Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles, and Alexandra Kent
(2012) Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics 44.6–7: 876-889. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte, and Sae Oshima
(2012) Negotiation of entitlement in proposal sequences. Discourse Studies 14.1: 67-86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asmuß, Birte, and Jan Svennevig
(2009) Meeting talk – an introduction. Journal of Business Communication 46: 3-22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bax, Ingrid Pufahl
(1986) How to assign work in an office: A comparison of spoken and written directives in American english. Journal of Pragmatics 10.6: 673-692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boden, Deirdre
(1994) The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Craven, Alexandra, and Jonathan Potter
(2010) Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies 12.4: 419-442. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci
(2006) Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics 38.8: 1257-1280. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew
(2008) Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on language and social interaction 41.2: 129-153. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci, John Local, and Gareth Walker
(2006) Repetition and the prosody–pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 38.10: 1721-1751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djordjilovic, Olga
(2012) Displaying and developing team identity in workplace meetings - a multimodal perspective. Discourse Studies 14.1: 111-127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
(2005) Conversation analysis. In K. Fitch, and R. Sanders (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 71-102.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
(1992) Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
(1976) Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5.1: 25-66. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gheorghe, Mihaela, and Adina Velea
(2012) Control Acts In Romanian. In Stanca Măda, and Răzvan Săftoiu (eds.), Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 135-167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
(2006) Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text and Talk 26.4-5: 513-541.Google Scholar
Guţu-Romalo, Valeria
(2008) The Grammar of Romanian Language (in Romanian). Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
(2006) 'Will you or can't you?': Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics 38.7: 1081-1104. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
(2010) Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 13-31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, Tiina, and Rauniomaa, Mirka
(2012) The organization of participation and contingency in prebeginnings of request sequences. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45.4: 323-351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Alexandra
(2012) Responding to parental directives - What can children do when a parent tells them what to do? In M. Theobold, and S. Danby (eds.), Disputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People. New York: American Sociological Association’s Studies of Children and Youth and Emerald Books. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-H
(2011) Managing non-granting of customers’ requests in commercial service encounters. Research on Language & Social Interaction 44: 109-134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna
(2005) Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. In A. Hakulinen, and M. Selting (eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 209-233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin
(2006) On Romanian imperatives. Philologica Jassyensia II.1: 47-59.Google Scholar
Măda, Stanca
(2009) Communication in Romanian professional environment (in Romanian). Braşov: Editura Universităţii Transilvania din Braşov.Google Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva, and Joerg Zinken
(2011) How to propose an action as objectively necessary: The case of polish trzeba x (''one needs to x''). Research on Language & Social Interaction 44.3: 263-287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pană Dindelegan, Gabriela
Forthcoming) Romanian Grammar: A linguistic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pearson, Bethyl
(1989) ‘Role-ing out control’ at church business meetings: Directing and disagreeing. Language Sciences 11: 289–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pîrvulescu, Mihaela, and Yves Roberge
(2000) The syntax and morphology of Romanian imperatives. In V. Motapanyane (ed.), Comparative studies in Romanian syntax. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 295-313.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
(2010) Conversation Analysis. An introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
(2012) Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45.3: 297-321. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
(2004) ''No no no'' and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research 30.2: 260-293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svennevig, Jan
(2012a) The agenda as resource for topic introduction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies 14.1: 53-66. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2012b) Interaction in workplace meetings. Discourse Studies 14.1: 3-10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasilescu, Andra
Forthcoming) Clause types. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.) Romanian Grammar: A linguistic introduction Oxford Oxford University Press
Vine, Bernadette
(2004) Getting things done at work: The discourse of power in workplace interaction. (Vol. 124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2009) Directives at work: Exploring the contextual complexity of workplace directives. Journal of Pragmatics 41.7: 1395-1405. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Xrakovskij, Viktor S
(2001) Typology of imperative constructions. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Zafiu, Rodica
Forthcoming) Mood, tense and aspect. In Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.) Romanian Grammar: A linguistic introduction Oxford Oxford University Press