Laughing when nothing’s funny: The pragmatic use of coping laughter in the negotiation of conversational disagreement

Shawn Warner-Garcia


Laughter is primarily a social phenomenon and used as a resource for managing social relationships and identities. While it is often unplanned and uncensored, laughter is also strategically produced at particular moments to accomplish particular goals in interaction. In this article, I examine the ways in which laughter – specifically, what I call coping laughter – is utilized to manage the face-threatening relational aspects of disagreements rather than to deal with the actual content of disputes. The four specific functions of coping laughter that I analyze are (1) face-threat mitigation, (2) face-loss concealment, (3) serious-to-nonserious frame switch, and (4) topic transition facilitation. Which of these functions are accomplished varies depending on several contextual factors, including who initiates the laughter, how other participants respond to the laughter, and the overarching context and participant roles at play in the interaction. I discuss each of these influencing factors and the associated interactional functions of coping laughter in relation to the data I analyze. I argue that coping laughter is an efficient and effective strategy for dealing with the interactional trouble caused by a disagreement without dealing with its content.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Adelsward, V., and B. Oberg
(1998) The function of laughter and joking in negotiation activities. Humor 11.4: 411-429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J., and J. Heritage
(eds.) (1984) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G
(1954) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Blackwell, S
(2003) What’s in a pear film narrative? Framing and the power of expectation in Spanish. Spanish in Context 6.2: 249-300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., and S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W
(2007) The Importance of Not Being Earnest: The Feeling behind Laughter and Humor. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chapman, A., and H. Foot
(eds.) (1996) Humor and Laughter: Theory, Research, and Applications. Piscataway, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Coates, J
(1996) Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2007) Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 29-49. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J
(2007) The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139-182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Representing discourse. Ms. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Glenn, P
(1983) Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 127-149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P.J
(1989) Initiating shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Communication 53.2: 127-149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P
(1992) Current speaker initiation of two-party shared laughter. Research on Language and Social Interaction 25: 139-162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P.J
(2003) Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Glenn, P
(2010) Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 42.6: 1485-1498. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper and Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Haakana, M
(2010) Laughter and smiling: Notes on co-occurrences. Journal of Pragmatics 42.6: 1499-1512. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J
(1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, E
(2010) The last laugh: Shared laughter and topic termination. Journal of Pragmatics 42.6: 1513-1525. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, T
(2005) Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 73-93.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I., and R. Wooffitt
(1998) Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G
(1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 79-95.Google Scholar
(1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346-369.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G., H. Sacks, and E. Schegloff
(1977) Preliminary notes on the sequential organization of laughter. Pragmatics Microfiche. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locher, M., and R. Watts
(2005) Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9-33.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markaki, V., S. Merlino, L. Mondada, and F. Oloff
(2010) Laughter in professional meetings: The organization of an emergent ethnic joke. Journal of Pragmatics 42.6: 1526-1542. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mills, S
(2003) Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N., and A. Spitz
(2008) Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 40.10: 1661-1686. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, J
(2007) What’s in an FTA? Reflections on a chance meeting with Claudine. Journal of Politeness Research 3: 243-268.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments. In J. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79-112.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Potter, J
(1997) Discourse analysis. In M. Hardy, and A. Bryman (eds.), Handbook of data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers, pp. 610-623.Google Scholar
Provine, R
(2000) Laughter: A Scientific Investigation. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Sacks, H
(1987) On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button, and J. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation: Multilingual matters. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 697-735. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D., D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton
(2003) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H
(2005) (Im)Politeness, face, and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and relationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 95-119.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ten Have, P
(1999) Doing Conversation Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wood, L., and R. Kroger
(2000) Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.  BoPGoogle Scholar