Ethnomethodology, culture, and implicature: Toward an empirical pragmatics

Jack Bilmes
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Atkinson, J. M., & P. Drew
(1979) Order in court. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, J
(1985) “Why that now?”: Two kinds of conversational meaning. Discourse Processes 8: 319-355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986) Discourse and behavior. New York: Plenum. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1988) The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society 17: 161-181. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1993) Dividing the rice: A microanalysis of the mediator’s role in a Northern Thai negotiation. Language in Society 21: 569-602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Constituting silence: Life in the world of total meaning. Semiotica 98: 73-87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press) Negotiation and compromise: A microanalysis of a discussion in the Federal Trade Commission. In A. Firth (ed.) The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace Oxford Pergamon DOI logo
Birdwhistell, R. L
(1970) Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Button, G., P. Drew, & J. Heritage
(1986) Transcription notation. Human Studies 9: 109-10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J., P. Kay, & M.C. O’Connor
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64: 501-538. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & D.L. Wieder
(1992) Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternative technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. Newbury Park, California: Sage, pp. 175-206.Google Scholar
Geoghegan, W.H
(1973) Natural information processing rules: Formal theory and applications to ethnography. Monographs of the Language-Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Horn, L.R
(1984) Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11-42.Google Scholar
Lee, J.R.E
(1992) Language and culture: The linguistic analysis of culture. In G. Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 196-226.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H
(1991) The school’s work of sorting students. In D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 71-90.Google Scholar
Moerman, M
(1988) Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H
(1972) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J.J. Gumperz & D.H. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 325-45.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1984) Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21-27.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, & G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematic« for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696-735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
(1991) Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 44-70.Google Scholar
(1984) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 28-52.Google Scholar
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70: 1075-95 DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D
(1987) Toward an empirical base in pragmatics (review article). Language in Society 16: 381-96. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T.P
(1991) Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction. In D. Boden and D.H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 22-43.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D.H
(1993) Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency revisited. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 179-194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D.H., & D.L. Wieder
(1970) Ethnomethodology and the problem of order: Comment on Denzin. In J.D. Douglas (ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge. Chicago: Aldine, pp. 285-295.Google Scholar