Frames for politeness: A case study

Marina Terkourafi

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Aijmer, K.
(1996) Conversational routines in English. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Babiniotis, G.
(1969) 0 dia syntheseos ypokorismos is tin Ellinikin (Derivational diminution via compounding in Greek). Athens: Sofia N. Saripolos Library.Google Scholar
Bach, K. & Harnish, R.M.
(1980) Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C.
(1987) Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref Crossref Crossref CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Daltas, P.
(1985) Some patterns of variability in the use of diminutive and augmentative suffixes in spoken Modern Greek Koine (MGK). Glossologia 4: 63–88.Google Scholar
Dressier, W.U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L.
(1994) Morphopragmatics: diminutives and intensifies in Italian, German and other languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E.
(1976) The elementary forms of the religious life. London: George Allen & Unwin. [First edition: 1915]Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V.
(1996) Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. In: Jaszczolt, K. & Turner, K. (eds.) Contrastive semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 629–50.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J.
(1977) Scenes-and-frames semantics. In: Zampolli, A. (ed.) Linguistic structures processing. Amsterdam: North Holland, 55–81.Google Scholar
George, S.
(1990) Getting things done in Naples: action, language and context in discourse description. Bologna: Bologna Editrice.Google Scholar
Glick, D.J.
(1996) A reappraisal of Brown and Levinson’s Politeness: some universals in language use eighteen years later . Semiotica 109: 141–171.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1967) Interaction ritual: essays in face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
(1971) Relations in public: microstudies in the public order. London: Penguin Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1976) Replies and responses. Language in society 5: 257–313. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Joseph, B. & Philippaki-Warburton, I.
(1987) Modern Greek. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, D.
(1996) Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72: 533–78. Crossref  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mackridge, P.
(1985) The Modern Greek language: A descriptive analysis of Standard Modern Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mao, L.M.
(1994) Beyond politeness theory: ‘face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 451–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mey, J.
(1993) Pragmatics: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M.
(1975) A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston, P. (ed.) The psychology of computer vision. New York: MacGraw-Hill, 211–277.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I.
(1992) Eisagogi sti theoritiki glossologia (An introduction to theoretical linguistics). Athens: Nefeli.Google Scholar
Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R.P.
(1977) Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S.W.
(1995) Inter cultural communication: a discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M.
(1992) The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 155–73. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
(ed.) (1993) Framing in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1994) Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Triantafyllides, M.
(1963) I geniki ton ypokoristikon se -aki kai to Neoelliniko klitiko systima (The genitive of diminutives in -aki and the Modern Greek system of inflections). In: Apanta Manoli Triantafyllidi (The complete works ofManolis Triantafyllides). Vol. II. Thessaloniki: Institute of Modem Greek Studies, 141–171.Google Scholar
Turner, K.
(1996) The principal principles of pragmatic inference: politeness. Language teaching 29: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werkhofer, K.T.
(1992) Traditional and modern views: the social constitution and the power of politeness. In: Watts, R.J., Ide, S. & Ehlich, K. (eds.) Politeness in language: studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 155–199.Google Scholar