Some Replies to Lambert and Pym

Itamar Even-Zohar
Unit for Culture Research, Tel Aviv University

Table of contents

I am grateful to both José Lambert and Anthony Pym for their critical readings of my paper "The Making of Culture Repertoires and the Role of Transfer" (Even-Zohar 1977c). Such readings are quite rare among colleagues, and certainly have been rare in my case. However, the cryptic nature of the paper, and the fact it barely referred the reader to other papers of mine where some topics are more elaborated, seem to have led to a number of misunderstandings.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

[ p. 369 ]References

Even-Zohar, Itamar
1990Polysystem Studies. [a special issue of Poetics Today.]Google Scholar
1994 “Culture Planning and the Market”. Available from: “http://​www​.tau​.ac​.il​/Mtamarez​/papers​/plan​_clt​.html”.
1997 “Factors and Dependencies in Culture: A Revised Draft for Polysystem Culture Research”. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature XIV:1. 15–34. Part II also available from: “http://​www​.tau​.ac​.il​/~itamarez​/papers​/fac​&dep​.htm”.
1997a “Repertoire and the Wealth of Entities”, “http://​www​.tau​.ac​.il​/~itamarez​/papers​/rep​&wea2​.html”.
1997b “Culture Planning and Cultural Resistance”. “http://​www​.tau​.ac​.il​/~itamarez​/papers​/plan​_res​.html”.
1997c “The Making of Culture Repertoire and the Role of Transfer.” Target 9:2. 355–363.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997d “Literature as Goods, Literature as Tools”. “http://​www​.tau​.ac​.il​/~itamarez​/papers​/list​-g​&t​.htm”.