Pragmatic shifts in two translations of Fusheng Liuji : A descriptive study of request behaviour

Vincent X. Wang
The University of Macau
Abstract

This study focuses on translation shifts in speech act realisation patterns in two English translations of the Chinese work Fusheng Liuji. It employs analytical tools from cross-cultural pragmatics to describe speech act behaviour in the original and its translations. Lin uses more translation shifts—including significant shifts in strategy use, and moderate shifts in information sequencing—than Pratt … Chiang, who mainly retain the original pragmatic features. Both the translators and the original author make frequent use of request formulae. The two translations also show marked shifts from lexical to syntactic modification of requests. The article further examines the translators’ approaches to translation in terms of their concept of translation and the historical and social contexts of their translations.

Keywords:
Table of contents

Translation shifts have long been a core issue in translation studies. Vinay and Darbelnet (1958/1995) used the term ‘transposition’ to refer to the phenomenon whereby a word from a given word class shifts to another class in the process of translation. Catford (1965) conducted a more systematic study of translation shifts, and proposed two types of shift—level and category shifts. Catford’s approach is based on Hallidayan systemic-functional grammar, and is intrinsically linguistics-oriented. He defines translation shifts as “departures from formal correspondence in the process of going from the SL to the TL,” and claims that formal equivalence is achievable only in rare cases, since “every language is formally sui generis and formal correspondence is, at best, a rough approximation” (1965: 36). [ p. 210 ]For Catford, translation shifts at various grammatical levels are unavoidable. Toury (1995) addresses the issues of translation norms and translation shifts in the context of descriptive translation studies. Norms refer to values and ideas shared by a community, that govern the ways in which language is used. For Toury, even the notion of equivalence is closely related to norms: “it is norms that determine the (type and extent of) equivalence manifested by actual translations” (1995: 61). Since the norms operating in the source-language (SL) and target-language (TL) communities do not coincide, a translator needs to negotiate the differences between these two distinct systems of norms and conventions—in other words, between two cultures (Pym 2004). The translator can either attach importance to source-language norms, which leads to an adequate translation; or subscribe to target-language norms, which facilitates acceptability in the target culture (Toury 1995: 57). The latter strategy tends to lead to translation shifts. Toury (1995) distinguishes between obligatory and non-obligatory shifts, and points out that nonobligatory shifts constitute the majority of shifts in human translation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Abdel-Hafiz, Ahmed-Sokarno
2003 “Pragmatic and linguistic problems in the translation of Naguib Mahfouz’s The Thief and the Dogs: A case study”. Babel 49:3. 229–252.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Achiba, Machiko
2003 Learning to Request in a Second Language: A Study of Child Interlanguage Pragmatics. Clevedon, England/Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Khafaji, Rasoul
2006 “In search of translational norms: The case of shifts in lexical repetition in Arabic-English translations”. Babel 52:1. 39–65.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona
1992 In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Taylor & Francis Limited.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birch, Cyril
1961 “Review of Chapters From a Floating Life. The Autobiography of a Chinese Artist by Shen Fu, translated by Shirley M. Black”. The Journal of Asian Studies 20:4. 526–527.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1986 “Shifts of cohesion and coherence in translation”. Juliane House and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, eds. Interlingual and Intercultural Communication. Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Tübingen: Narr. 1986 17–35.Google Scholar
1989 “Playing it safe: The role of conventionality in directness”. Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper, eds. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp 1989 37–70.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, and Juliane House
1989 “Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: an introductory overview”. Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper, eds. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp. 1989 1–34.Google Scholar
[ p. 231 ]
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
Boase-Beier, Jean
2004 “Knowing and not knowing: Style, intention and the translation of a holocaust poem”. Language and Literature 13:1. 25–35.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourne, Julian
2002 “He said, she said: Controlling illocutionary force in the translation of literary dialogue”. Target 14:2. 241–261.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catford, John C.
1965 A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Wing-Tsit
1947 “Ling Yutang, critic and interpreter”. College English 8:4. 163–169.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Andrew D.
1996 “Developing the ability to perform speech acts”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18:2. 253–267.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cosme, Christelle
2006 “Clause combining across languages: A corpus-based study of English-French translation shifts”. Languages in Contrast 6:1. 71–108.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doleželová-Velingerová, Milena, and Lubomír Doležel
1972 “An Early Chinese Confessional Prose: Shen Fu’s Six Chapters of a Floating Life”. T’oung Pao, 2nd Series 58:1/5. 137–160.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dong, Hui <董晖
> 2002 “<老到圓熟出神入化: 林語堂《浮生六记》英譯本賞析>”. Journal of Xi’an Internat ional Studies University 10:3. 11–15.Google Scholar
Emery, Peter G.
2004 “Translation, equivalence and fidelity: A pragmatic approach”. Babel 50:2. 143–167.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farghal, Mohammed, and Ahmed Borini
1997 “Pragmareligious failure in translating Arabic politeness formulas into English: Evidence from Mahfouz’s Awlad Haritna”. Multilingua 16:1. 77–99.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr.
1986 “What makes some indirect speech acts conventional?” Journal of Memory and Language 25:2. 181–196.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August
1991 Translation and relevance: Cognition and context. Oxford: Basil Black-well.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil, and Jeremy Munday
2004 Translation: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, Xianbin
2006 “Cultural status and language selection in translation”. Journal of Language and Politics 5:3. 415.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hegel, Robert E.
1986 “Review of The Story of the Stone, vol. 4 The Debt of Tears, vol. 5, The Dreamer Wakes by Cao Xueqin & E Gao, translated by John Minford”. Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews (CLEAR) 8:1/2. 129.Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo
1999 Translation in Systems: Descriptive and Systemic Approaches Explained. Manchester, England: Saint Jerome.Google Scholar
Hickey, Leo
ed. 1998 The Pragmatics of Translation. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Howell, E. B.
1936 “Review of T’ien Hsia”. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1931–1939) 15:3. 478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Eva, and David Pollard
1998 “Chinese translation”. Mona Baker and Kirsten Malmkjaer, eds. Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. London/New York: Routledge 1998 365–376.Google Scholar
Huang, Martin W.
1995 Literati and Self-Re/Presentation: Autobiographical Sensibility in the Eighteenth-Century Chinese Novel. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 232 ]
Jakobson, Roman
1959/2000 “On translation”. Lawrence Venuti, ed. The Translation Studies: Reader. London: Routledge 1959/2000 113–118.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
ed. 1995 Pragmatics of Chinese as Native and Target Language. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele, and Kenneth R. Rose
1999 „Pragmatics and SLA“. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 19. 81–104.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Andy
1991 “Information sequencing in Mandarin letters of request”. Anthropological Linguistics 33:2. 183–203.Google Scholar
1992 “Schemas, authentic texts and cross-cultural communication”. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics supplement 9. 101–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korzen, Iørn
2005 “Endocentric and exocentric languages in translation”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 13:1. 21–37.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, José, and Hendrik van Gorp
1985 “On describing translation”. Theo Hermans, ed. The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation. London: Croom Helm 1985 42–53.Google Scholar
Lee-Wong, Song Mei
1994 “Imperatives in requests: Direct or impolite-observations from Chinese”. Pragmatics 4:4. 491–515.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leuven-Zwart, Kitty M van
1989 “Translation and original: Similarities and dissimilarities, I”. Target 1:2. 151–181.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Shi-Wang <黎土旺
> 2007 “<文化取向与翻译策略:《浮生六记》两个英译本之比较>”. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching 7:220. 53–55.Google Scholar
Li, Yunxing
1998 “Formal shifts in English-Chinese translation”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 6:1. 71–77.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Yutang
1940/1991 “<論翻譯> (On translation)”. Zhenhua Yang, ed. <翻譯論集> (Selected Essays on Translation) Shanghai: Shanghai Bookstore 1940/1991 6–32.Google Scholar
Malmkjaer, Kirsten
1998 “Love thy neighbour: Will parallel corpora endear linguists to translators?” Meta 43:4. 534–541.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marquez Reiter, Rosina
2000 Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and Apologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, Ian, and Adriana Serban
2003 “Deixis as an interactive feature in literary translations from Romanian into English”. Target 15:2. 269–294.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2002 “Will ‘translationese’ ruin a contrastive study”. Languages in Contrast 2:2. 161–185.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMorran, Ian
2000 “Chinese literary translation into English”. Olive Classe, ed. Encyclopedia of Literary Translation into English. Vol. 1. London/Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers 2000 278–281.Google Scholar
Olohan, Maeve
2004 Introducing Corpora in Translation Studies. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puurtinen, Tiina
2003 “Explicitating and implicitating source text ideology”. Across Languages and Cultures 4:1. 53–62.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pym, Anthony
2004 “Propositions on cross-cultural communication and translation”. Target 16:1. 1–28.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, Kenneth R.
2000 “An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22:1. 27–67.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon
1995 Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Wong Suzanne Scollon
1991 “Topic confusion in English-Asian discourse”. World Englishes 10:2. 113–125.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
[ p. 233 ]
Searle, John R.
1975 “Indirect speech acts”. Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, eds. Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 3. Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press 1975 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R
1969 Speech acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sequeiros, Xose Rosales
2002 “Interlingual pragmatic enrichment in translation”. Journal of Pragmatics 34:8. 1069–1089.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Fu.
1960 The Autobiography of a Chinese Artist: Shen Fu. Translated by Shirley M. Black. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1983 Six Records of a Floating Life. Translated by Leonard Pratt and Su-Hui Chiang. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
1999 Six Chapters of a Floating Life (浮生六記). Translated by Yutang Lin. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Skewis, Malcolm
2003 “Mitigated directness in Honglou meng: Directive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth century Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics 35. 161–189.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna
1995 Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
1995 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London/New York: Routledge.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Translation, community, utopia”. Lawrence Venuti, ed. The Translation Studies: Reader 2004 482–502.Google Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet
1958/1995 Comparative stylistics of French and English: A methodology for translation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wang, John C. Y.
1976 “Review of The Story of the Stone, vol. 1, The Golden Days by Cao Xueqin, translated by David Hawkes”. The Journal of Asian Studies 35:2. 302–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Vincent Xian
2006 Chinese EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Competence in Requests. PhD dissertation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
2007 “A pragmatic examination of translation of implied meaning”. Translation Watch Quarterly 3:3. 34–45.Google Scholar
Wei, Wei-Hua
2005 A Study of the Two English Versions of Fu Sheng Liu Ji from the Perspective of Skopos Theory. Unpublished MA dissertation, Guangxi Normal U.Google Scholar
Yang, Gladys
1980 “Review of The Story of the Stone. vol. I: The Golden Days by Cao Xueqin, translated by David Hawkes”. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 43:3. 621–622.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Ming-Chung
1999 Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Pragmatics: Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Harvard U.Google Scholar
1999 “Universalistic and culture-specific perspectives on variation in the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language”. Pragmatics 9:2. 281–312.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
[ p. 234 ]