Flow in translation: Exploring optimal experience for translation trainees
Mehdi Mirlohi,Joy Egbert and Behzad Ghonsooly
Sheikhbahaee University, Esfahan | Washington State University | Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad
The study reported here examined the amount and quality of flow experienced by trainee translators while translating different text genres. Flow (Csikszentmihalyi 1975) is an optimal experience, characterized by intense focus, control, interest and skills-challenge balance that leads to enhanced performance on a task. Although investigated in areas such as professional sports, surgery, and music, Flow Theory has not yet been tested in the area of translation. This study aimed at identifying which discourse genre would induce most flow in trainee translators while translating. Fifty-six Iranian English Translation majors studying at the University of Kashan translated three 180-word texts of narrative, expository, and descriptive genres. After each translation, they responded to a Flow Perceptions Questionnaire (Egbert, 2003) in the Likert format to report their perceptions of flow. Using repeated measures ANOVA, the researchers investigated flow differences among genres. The results indicated that flow existed in the translation classroom and that there were significant differences in the flow scores engendered by different genres. To support the findings drawn from the numerical analysis, four participants, selected from the population of subjects from the first phase, were interviewed, and the analysis of the interviews generally corroborated the statistical findings.
Since the last quarter of the previous century, researchers have probed environmental conditions and learner characteristics that may lead to optimal learning, and some have suggested that when a learner has a strong will to learn, he might overcome barriers in the way of learning (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990, 2008; Gardner [ p. 252 ]& Lambert, 1972). As a result, learner skills would incrementally improve and the learner would seek to tackle more challenging tasks in keeping with the increasing skills, experiencing such enjoyment in learning that it would become its own reward. The concept of flow was proposed to account for these phenomena.
2000 ““Blinking out” and “having the touch”: Two fifth-grade boys talk about flow experience in writing”. Written Communication 17. 53–92.
2000 “The autotelic personality: an exploratory investigation.” Unpublished manuscript. University of Chicago.
2004 “Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: how do they experience challenges in daily life?” Journal of Happiness Studies 5. 123–154.
Conlin, M. L.
1998Patterns: a short prose reader. Houghton Mifflin Company: USA
1975Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-bass.
1989 “The optimal experience in work and leisure”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56. 815–822.
1990Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
1996Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
1997a “Evolution and Flow”. NAMTA Journal 22:2. 118–149.
1997b “Flow and education”. NAMTA Journal 22:2. 2–35.
1997c “Flow and evolution”. NAMTA Journal 22:2. 36–58.
1997d “Flow and creativity”. NAMTA Journal 22:2. 61–97.
1988Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Nakamura, J.
1999 “Emerging goals and the self-regulation of behavior”. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (ed.). Perspectives on behavioral self-regulation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 107–118.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K. & Whalen, S.
1993Talented teenagers: the roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Custodero, L. A.
2002 “Seeking challenge, finding skill: Flow experience and music education.” Arts Education Policy Review 103:3. 3–9.
[ p. 268 ]
Deci, E. L.
1992 “The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: a self-determination theory perspective.” In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 43–70.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M.
1987 “The support of autonomy and the control of behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53. 1024–1037.
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A.
2002 “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals.” Annual Review of Psychology 53. 109–32.
2003 “A Study of Flow Theory in the foreign language classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 87. 499–518.
Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E.
1972Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Hektner, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M.
1996 “A longitudinal exploration of flow and intrinsic motivation in adolescents”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
1999From subjective experience to cultural change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jackson, S. A. & Marsh, H. W.
1996 “Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 18. 17–35.
Jackson, S. & Roberts, G.
1992 “Positive performance states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding of peak performance.” The Sport Psychologist, 6, 156–171.
Massimini, F. & Delle Fave, A.
2000 “Individual development in a bio-cultural perspective.” American Psychologist 55. 24–33.
Massimini, F., Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Delle Fave, A.
1988 “Flow and biocultural evolution”. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds). Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press. 60–81.
McQuillan, J. & Conde, G.
1996 “The conditions of flow in reading: Two studies of optimal experience.” Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly 17. 109–135.
Montena, G. B. & Csikszentmihalyi, M.
1996 “The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience.” Journal of Personality 64. 266–310.
Nakamura, J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M.
2002 “The concept of flow”. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 89–105.
Schmidt, R., Boraie, D. & Kassabgy, O.
1996 “Foreign language motivation: internal structure and external connections”. In R. Oxford (ed.). Language learning motivation: Pathways to the new century. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press. 9–56.
Schmidt, R. & Savage, W.
1992 “Challenge, skill and motivation.” PASAA 22. 14–28.
Shernoff, D. J. & Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B. & Shernoff, E. S.
2003 “Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of Flow Theory.” School Psychology Quarterly 18:2. 158–176.
1992 “Flow in computer-mediated communication: Electronic mail and voice ail evaluation and impacts.” Communication Research 19. 539–573.
Wanner, B., Ladouceur, R., Auclair, A. V. & Vitaro, F.
2006 “Flow and dissociation: examination of mean levels, cross-links, and links to emotional well-being across sports and recreational and pathological gambling.” Journal of Gambling Studies 22:3. 289–304.
[ p. 269 ]
Webster, J., Trevino, L. & Ryan, L.
1993 “The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions.” Computers in Human Behavior 9. 411–426.
1997 “Assessing flow experiences in highly able adolescent learners.” Paper resented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Chicago, IL.
Wong, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, M.
1991 “Motivation and academic achievement: The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience.” Journal of Personality 59:3. 539–574.