A habitus-oriented perspective on resistance to language planning through translation: A case study on the Turkish translation of Elif Şafak’s The Bastard of Istanbul

Hilal Erkazanci Durmus

Abstract

This paper explores some aspects of the socio-biography of the Turkish writer Elif Şafak, who made substantial changes to Baba ve Piç, the Turkish translation of her novel The Bastard of Istanbul. Arguing that Şafak’s habitus has a considerable influence on her style in Baba ve Piç, the paper focuses on Şafak’s incorporation of Ottoman Turkish words into the Turkish translation in order to show that the addition of these words frames the Turkish translation within the broader narrative of language planning in Turkey. Ultimately, the study argues that the concept of habitus and the concept of narrative can be fruitfully brought together to explain how certain socio-stylistic aspects of the habitus-governed translation respond to the larger narratives of the target society.

Keywords:
Table of contents

Pierre Bourdieu’s (1984) sociological theory of habitus has proven a particularly fruitful area of research for Translation Studies since the publication of Daniel Simeoni’s influential paper “The Pivotal Status of the Translator’s Habitus” (1998). In the light of a habitus-oriented approach to translation, translators’ practices are considered to be moulded by the relationship that evolves between their social trajectories and embodied dispositions, on the one hand, and the structure of the translation field in which they are involved, on the other hand.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Ahmad, Feroz
1993The Making of Modern Turkey. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akalın, Haluk
2002“Bitmeyen Tartışma Q, X, W…” [The endless debate Q, X, W…]. Türk Dili Dergisi [The Turkish Language Journal] 601 (1): 6–13.Google Scholar
Akbatur, Arzu
2010Writing/Translating in/to English: The ‘Ambivalent’ Case of Elif Şafak. PhD diss. Bogazici University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict
1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Armutçu, Emel
2004 “Sabırsızlıktan yumurta bile kıramazdı, çok sabır isteyen romancılığı seçti” [She could not manage to break an egg due to her impatience, she chose to be a novelist, which requires a lot of patience]. http://​www​.elifsafak​.us​/degerlendirmeler​.asp​?islem​=degerlendirme​&id​=31. Accessed April 2012.
Aşut, Atilla
2012 “Elif Şafak’ın Osmanlıca Sevdası” [Elif Şafak’s love of the Ottoman language]. Birgün Newspaper. http://​www​.birgun​.net​/writer​_index​.php​?category​_code​=1328529828​&news​_code​=1342427275​&year​=2012​&month​=07​&day​=16#​.UdAPA​_mndKc. Accessed May 2013.
Baker, Mona
2000“Towards a Methodology for Investigating the Style of a Literary Translator.” Target 12 (2): 241–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Translation and Conflict: A Narrative Account. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1981The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: Texas UP.Google Scholar
2001“Unitary Language.” In The Routledge Language and Cultural Theory Reader, ed. by Lucy Burke, Tony Crowley, and Allan Girvin, 269–279. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berk, Özlem
2004Translation and Westernisation in Turkey: From the 1840s to the 1980s. Istanbul: Ege.Google Scholar
Bingöl, Yılmaz
2012 “Sade Öz Türkçe Sarmalında Anayasanın Dili” [The language of the Constitution in the spiral of plain pure Turkish]. Anayasanın Dili Sempozyumu [Symposium on the language of the Constitution]. 1–22. http://​www​.tded​.org​.tr​/images​/logo​/sem​/yilmaz​_bingol​.pdf. Accessed March 2013.
Boase-Beier, Jean
2006Stylistic Approaches to Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1984Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1990The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, Angie
2006 “A Writer on the Edge of Her Culture.” http://​www​.wildriverreview​.com​/2​/2​-spotlight​_shafak​.html. Accessed May 2013.
Brisset, Annie
1989“In Search of a Target Language: The Politics of Theatre Translation in Quebec.” Target 1 (1): 9–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demiröz, Nazlı
2009 “Under the Spell of Divine and Human Love: Taking a Long Journey into Yourself.” http://​www​.elifsafak​.us​/en​/roportajlar​.asp​?islem​=roportaj​&id​=17. Accesssed June 2013.
[ p. 404 ]
Ertop, Konur
1963“Atatürk Devriminde Türk Dili” [The Turkish language in Ataturk’s revolution]. Atatürk ve Türk Dili [Atatürk and the Turkish language] 224 (1): 53–102.Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar
1978Papers in Historical Poetics. Tel Aviv: Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard
1980 [1972]Narrative Discourse. An Essay in Method. Translated by Jane E. Lewin. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gropp, Lewis
2006 “In Turkey, a Novel Is a Public Statement: Interview with Elif Shafak.” http://​en​.qantara​.de​/In​-Turkey​-a​-Novel​-Is​-a​-Public​-Statement​/8760c8829i1p510​/index​.html. Accessed February 2011.
Grutman, Rainier
2009“Self-Translation.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, ed. by Mona Baker, and Gabriela Saldanha, 257–260. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sue-Ann
2012“How Do I Apply Narrative Theory? Socio-narrative Theory in Translation Studies.” Target 24 (2): 286–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendrich, Béatrice
2011“Introduction – Beyond State Islam: Religiosity and Spirituality in Contemporary Turkey.” European Journal of Turkish Studies 13: 1–13.Google Scholar
Heyd, Uriel
1954Language Reform in Modern Turkey. Jerusalem: Israeli Oriental Society.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel
1996The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Karpat, Kemal
1959Turkey’s Politics: The Transition to a Multi-Party System. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levend, Agâh Sırrı
1972Türk Dilinde Gelişme ve Sadeleşme Evreleri [The phases of development and simplification in the Turkish language]. Ankara: TDK.Google Scholar
Lewis, Bernard
1961The Emergence of Modern Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malmkjær, Kirsten
2003“What Happened to God and the Angels: An Exercise in Translational Stylistics.” Target 15 (1): 37–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meylaerts, Reine
2006“Literary Heteroglossia in Translation. When the Language of Translation is the Locus of Ideological Struggle.” In Translation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines, ed. by João Ferreira Duarte, Alexandra Assis Rosa, and Teresa Seruya, 85–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010“Habitus and Self-Image of Native Literary Author-Translators in Diglossic Societies.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 5 (1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukařovský, Jan
1964“Standard Language and Poetic Language” In A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style, ed. by Paul L. Garvin, 17–30. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2008Style and Ideology in Translation: Latin American Writing in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oran, Baskın
1993Atatürk Milliyetçiliği [Ataturk’s nationalism]. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi.Google Scholar
Özkan, Fadime
2004 “İki arada, bir ‘Araf’ta” [In-between, in Limbo]. http://​yenisafak​.com​.tr​/arsiv​/2004​/mayis​/20​/kultur​.html. Accessed June 2013.
Ricœur, Paul
1981“Narrative Time.” In On Narrative, ed. by W.J.T. Mitchell, 165–186. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roll
2002 “Cesur birinin korktuğu an” [The moment when someone brave gets afraid]. http://​www​.elifsafak​.us​/roportajlar​.asp​?islem​=roportaj​&id​=222. Accessed May 2013.
Saldanha, Gabriela
2011“Translator Style: Methodological Considerations.” The Translator 17 (1): 25–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 405 ]
Scharf, Michael
Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet
2005“How To Be a (Recognized) Translator: Rethinking Habitus, Norms and the Field of Translation.” Target 17 (1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simeoni, Daniel
1998“The Pivotal Status of the Translator’s Habitus.” Target 10 (1): 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007“Between Sociology and History. Method in Context and in Practice.” In Constructing a Sociology of Translation, ed. by Michaela Wolf, and Alexandra Fukari, 187–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Paul
2004Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Somers, Margaret R., and Gloria D. Gibson
1994“Reclaiming the Epistemological “Other”: Narrative and the Social Constitution of Identity.” In Social Theory and the Politics of Identity, ed. by Craig Calhoun, 37–99. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Susam-Sarajeva, Şebnem
2006Theories on the Move: Translation’s Role in the Travels of Literary Theories. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Şafak, Elif
2004The Saint of Insipient Insanities. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
2005“Linguistic Cleansing.” New Perspectives Quarterly 22 (3): 19–25. http://​www​.digitalnpq​.org​/archive​/2005​_summer​/05​_shafak​.html. Accessed August 2011. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Baba ve Piç. Translated by Aslı Biçen, and Elif Şafak. Istanbul: Metis Yayınları.Google Scholar
Shafak, Elif
2007The Bastard of Istanbul. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Şafak, Elif
2010aThe Forty Rules of Love: A Novel of Rumi. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
2010b “Kurgunun Politikası” [The policy of fiction]. http://​www​.ted​.com​/talks​/elif​_shafak​_the​_politics​_of​_fiction​.html​?-%2070000. Accessed on June 2012.
Şeker, Nimet
2008 “Murathan Mungan: The Muse of Mardin.” http://​en​.qantara​.de​/The​-Muse​-of​-Mardin​/8945c9027i1p504/. Accessed April 2012.
Tahir-Gürçağlar, Şehnaz
2008The Politics and Poetics of Translation in Turkey, 1923-1960. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yannakopoulou, Vasso
2014 “The Influence of the Habitus on Translatorial Style: Some Methodological Considerations Based on the Case of Yorgos Himonas’ Rendering of Hamlet into Greek.” In Remapping Habitus in Translation Studies, ed. by Gisella Vorderobermeier, 163–182. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yasin, Sara