A False Opposition in Translation Studies: Theoretical versus/and Historical Approaches

Dirk Delabastita

Abstract

After some preliminary notes on the fragmented state of Translation Studies, the author directs his attention to one of the seemingly irreconcilable oppositions within the discipline, namely, between "theoretical" and "historical" approaches to translation. On the basis of insights from modern epistemology it is claimed that the two are, in fact, complementary and that one should aim for a continuous interplay between them. Normative approaches fail to achieve this and prove to have little explanatory power when confronted with the historical reality of translation. Four discursive strategies are discussed whereby this anomaly is often camouflaged or explained away.

Table of contents

Abstract
References
Résumé
Address for correspondence

In spite of its young age the discipline of translation studies now has its standard books and bibliographies, its own specialized newsletters, journals and series, its research groups, conferences and university chairs; in short, [ p. 138 ]it is beginning to show the marks of academic respectability. Yet, it could be argued that the conceptual advances in the discipline have not kept pace with the gradual establishment of its present material and social infrastructure. Such a skeptical attitude is maintained by certain outsiders but—more disconcertingly—also by some of its foremost practitioners:

References

Delabastita, Dirk

1990a Review of Snell-Hornby 1988 Leuvense Bijdragen 79:2. 242–247.

1990b “There’s a Double Tongue”: An Investigation into the Translation of Shakespeare’s Wordplay. K.U. Leuven. [Doctoral Dissertation.]

Hermans, Theo

ed. 1985 The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation. London and Sydney: Croom Helm.

Holmes, James S.

1988 “The Future of Translation Studies: A Handful of Theses”. Translated!: Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi 1988 99–102.

Jakobson, Roman

1959 “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation”. Reuben A. Brower, ed. On Translation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1959 232–239.

Koller, Werner.

2 1983 Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer. [Unitaschenbücher, 819.]

Lambert, José

1983 “Un modèle descriptif pour l’étude de la littérature. La littérature comme polysystème”. Kortrijk: Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte van de K.U. Leuven, campus Kortrijk. [Preprint paper, 29.]

[ p. 152 ]

1976 “Echanges littéraires et traduction, ou: études théoriques vs. études descriptives” Lillebill Grähs, Gustav Korlèn and Bertil Malmberg, eds. Theory and Practice of Translation [Nobel Symposium, 39]. Bern, Frankfurt am Main, Las Vegas: Peter Lang 1976 237–250.

1988 “Twenty Years of Research on Literary Translation at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven”. Harald Kittel, ed. Die literarische Übersetzung: Stand und Perspektiven ihrer Erforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt 1988 122–138.

Lambert, José Hendrik van Gorp

1980 “Geschiedenis, theorie en systeem: valse dilemma’s in de literatuurwetenschap”. Spektator 10:6. 514–519.

Landheer, Ronald

1989 “L’ambiguïté: un défi traductologique”. Meta 34:1. 33–43.

Levý, Jiří

1967 “Translation as a Decision Process”. To Honor Roman Jakobson 2. The Hague and Paris: Mouton 1967 1171–1182.

Newmark, Peter

1981 Approaches to Translation. Oxford, etc.: Pergamon Press.

Quirk, Randolph and Sidney Greenbaum

1973 A University Grammar of English. London: Longman.

Roberts, Roda P.

1988 “The Need for Systematization of Translation Theory”. Paul Nekeman, ed. Translation, Our Future: Proceedings of the XIth World Congress of FIT. Maastricht: Euroterm 1988 117–123.

Shen, Dan

1989 “Literalism: NON ’Formal-equivalence’”. Babel 35:4. 219–235.

Snell-Hornby, Mary

1988 Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Söll, Ludwig

1971 “Traduisibilité et intraduisibilité”. Meta 16:1/2. 25–31.

Toury, Gideon

1980 In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, Tel Aviv University.

1989 Unpublished lectures delivered as holder of The CERA Chair for Translation, Communication and Cultures (Leuven), Summer 1989.

in press. “What are Descriptive Studies into Translation Likely to Yield apart from Isolated Descriptions?”. Kitty van Leuven-Zwart ed. Proceedings of the First James S Holmes Symposium on Translation Studies Amsterdam Rodopi

Vanderauwera, Ria

1982 Review of Toury 1980 . Dispositio 7:19/21. 177–179.

Wilss, Wolfram

1982 The Science of Translation: Problems and Methods. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. [Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 180.]