Human language is characteristically a form of social interactive behaviour. It may occasionally have other functions, but the motivation for its coming into existence (see Dunbar 1996; Allan 2003) and by far the majority of its usage is when S (speaker, writer, signer) addresses utterance U to audience H for an unbounded number of perlocutionary and illocutionary purposes such as to establish or maintain a social relationship, to inform, question, demand, warn, apologize, and so forth. S and H are mutually aware that, normally, their interlocutor is an intelligent being. S does not need to spell out those things which are obvious to the sensory receptors of H, or such that H can very easily reason them out using the knowledge that each of us develops from birth as we experience the world around us on the basis of communicative competence (knowing the language and the conventions for its use). These constitute common ground (CG). Our understanding of linguistic utterances rests on an assumption of CG: e.g. when S points to something visible in the situation of utterance and says Isn’t that nice? there is an assumption that H understands English and can also see it; saying Let’s go to Brisbane assumes that ‘Brisbane’ will be understood as referring to a certain city. Some CG is universal, e.g. knowledge of the sun as a heavenly body that is a source of light and warmth, rain as (among other things) a source of fresh water replenishing the earth, the physiological and socio-cultural differences between the sexes. Some CG is very restricted, e.g. between a couple who use the wicked witch to refer to the man’s second wife. Usually S can readily assess the probable CG with H, and chooses his or her words accordingly. This requires S to make assumptions about H’s capacity to understand U well enough that S’s expressed intention in the message is, in S’s opinion, more or less correctly interpreted by H (Allan 1986; Lasersohn 1999; Colston 2008: 173). S’s assumptions here are S’s estimates of the CG between S and H with respect to U; this is not something S is normally conscious of except, perhaps, when communicating with a stranger – and not often then. Assumed CG is based on an assessment of H’s competence to understand U, and it motivates such things as choice of language and language variety, style and level of presentation – because, for instance, addressing a neophyte or a child must be differently handled from addressing a group of experts. CG allows meaning to be underspecified by S, so that language understanding is a constructive process in which a lot of inferencing is expected from H.

References

Abbey, Edward.

1982 Down the River. New York: E.P. Dutton.

Abbey, Edward.

1988 One Life at a Time, Please. New York: Henry Holt.

Abbott, Barbara.

2008 “Presuppositions and common ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 523–38.

Allan, Keith.

1986 Linguistic Meaning. 2 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Reprint edn, Beijing: World Publishing Corporation. 1991).  BoP

Allan, Keith.

2001 Natural Language Semantics. Oxford & Malden MA: Blackwell.

Allan, Keith.

2003 “Linguistic metatheory.” Language Sciences 25: 533–60.

Allan, Keith.

2006 “Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English.” Language Sciences 28: 1–50.

Austin, John L.

1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  BoP

Bach, Kent.

2012 “Saying, meaning, and implicating.” In Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 47–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish

1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  BoP

Bartlett, Frederic C.

1932 Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, Gillian.

1995 Speakers, Listeners and Communication: Explorations in Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP

Chandler, Raymond.

1939 The Big Sleep. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Clark, Herbert H.

1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP

Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas B. Carlson

1981 “Context for comprehension.” In Attention and Performance IX, ed. by John Long and Alan Baddeley, 313–330. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.  BoP

Clark, Herbert H. and Catherine R. Marshall

1981 “Definite reference and mutual knowledge.” In Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. by Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber and Ivan A. Sag, 10–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp.  BoP

Clark, Herbert H., Robert Schreuder and Samuel Butterick

1983 “Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 245–58.  BoP

Colston, Herbert L.

2008 “A new look at common ground: memory, egocentrism, and joint meaning.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob L. Mey, 151–187. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP

Dunbar, Robin I.M.

1996 Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. London: Faber and Faber.  BoP

Duranti, Alessandro.

1997 Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP

Enfield, Nicholas J.

2008 “Common ground as a resource for social affiliation.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskés and Jacob L. Mey, 223–254. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Fillmore, Charles J.

1982 “Frame semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.

Garfinkel, Harold.

1964 “Studies of the routine rounds of everyday activities.” Social Problems 11: 225–250.

Goddard, Cliff.

2006 “Cultural scripts.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  BoP

Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka

2004 “Cultural scripts: what are they and what are they good for?” Intercultural Pragmatics 1: 153–166.  BoP

Goffman, Erving.

1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoP

Grice, H. Paul.

1957 “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66: 377–88. Reprinted in H. Paul Grice Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. 1989, pp. 213–223.  BoP

Grice, H. Paul.

1968 “Utterer’s meaning, sentence meaning, and word-meaning.” Foundations of Language 4: 225–42.

Grice, H. Paul.

1969 “Utterer’s meaning and intentions.” Philosophical Review 78: 147–77.  BoP

Grice, H. Paul.

1981 “Presupposition and conversational implicature.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 183–198. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H. Paul Grice Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. 1989, pp. 269–282.  BoP

Grice, H. Paul.

1982 “Meaning revisited.” In Mutual Knowledge, ed. by Neilson V. Smith, 223–243. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H. Paul Grice Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. 1989, pp. 283–303.  BoP

Grice, H. Paul.

1989 “Indicative conditionals.” Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge MA Harvard University Press, pp. 58–85.

Gumperz, John J.

1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP

Holtgraves, Thomas M.

2002 Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.  BoP

Horton, William S.

2008 “A memory-based approach to common ground and audience design.” In Intention, common ground, and the egocentric speaker-hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskés and Jacob L. Mey, 189–222. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP

Horton, William S. and Richard J. Gerrig

2005 “Conversational common ground and memory processses in language production.” Discourse Processes 40: 1–35.  BoP

Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley F. Peters

1979 “Conventional implicature.” In Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition, ed. by Choon-Kyu Oh and David A. Dinneen, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.  BoP

Kecskés, Istvan and Fenghui Zhang.

2009 “Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: a socio-cognitive approach.” Pragmatics and Cognition 17: 331–355.  BoP

Kecskés, Istvan and Fenghui Zhang.

2013 “On the dynamic relations between common ground and presupposition.” In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics, ed. by Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo and Marco Carapezza 375–396 Cham, CH: Springer.

Keysar, Boaz.

2007 “Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes.” Intercultural Pragmatics 4: 71–84.  BoP

Keysar, Boaz and Anne S. Henly

2002 “Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness.” Psychological Science 13: 207–212.

Ladefoged, Peter.

1982 A Course in Phonetics. 2nd edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Lasersohn, Peter.

1999 “Pragmatic halos.” Language 75: 522–51.  BoP

Lee, Benny P.H.

2001 “Mutual knowledge, background knowledge and shared beliefs: Their roles in establishing common ground.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 21–44.  BoP

Lewis, David.

1969 Convention. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.  BoP

Lewis, David.

1979 “Scorekeeping in a language game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–59.  BoP

Mazzone, Marco.

2011 “Schemata and associative processes in pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2148–2159.  BoP

Minsky, Marvin.

1977 “Frame-system theory.” In Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, ed. by Philip N. Johnson-Laird and P.C. Wason, 355–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP

Prince, Ellen.

1981 “Toward a taxonomy of given-new information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–256. New York: Academic Press.  BoP

Sanford, Anthony J. and Simon C. Garrod

1981 Understanding Written Language. Chichester: John Wiley.  BoP

Schank, Roger.

1984 The Cognitive Computer. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

Schank, Roger and Robert C. Abelson

1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.  BoP

Scheff, Thomas J.

1967 “Toward a scoiological model of consensus.” American Sociological Review 32: 32–46.

Schiffer, Stephen R.

1972 Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  BoP

Searle, John R.

1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.  BoP

Solheim, Dave and Rob Levin

1989 Bloomsbury Review. In Resist Much, Obey Little: Some Notes on Edward Abbey, ed. by James Hepworth and Gregory Mcnamee, 89–104. Tucson: Harbinger House.

Stalnaker, Robert C.

1973 “Presupposition.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 77–96.  BoP

Stalnaker, Robert C.

1974 “Pragmatic presupposition.” In Semantics and Philosophy, ed. by Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger. New York: New York University Press.  BoP

Stalnaker, Robert C.

1978 “Assertion.” In Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 315–332. New York: Academic Press.  BoP

Stalnaker, Robert C.

2002 “Common ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–21.  BoP

Twain, Mark

(Samuel Clemens) 1884 The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn: Scene, the Mississippi Valley: Time, forty to fifty years ago. London: Chatto & Windus.