Humor

Salvatore Attardo
Table of contents

The conceptual field of ‘humor’ is broad and only few areas within it are well determined. Attempts at defining and subcategorizing within the field areas such as ‘humor’ vs. ‘comedy’ or ‘ridicule’ have by and large failed. Lexicographic studies have only highlighted the differences and fluidity of the classifications used by various languages (Attardo 1994: 2–7). The term ‘humor’ has emerged as a technical term covering anything that is (or may) be perceived as funny, amusing, or laughable. This does not preclude the possibility of establishing subcategorizations in certain specific areas, e.g., tendentious humor, or ‘genres’ such as puns, jokes, etc. It should be noted, however, that terms such as ‘pun’ and ‘joke’ are not technical terms and are ultimately fuzzy. On these grounds, some have challenged the possibility of providing a unitary account of humor (e.g., Ferro-Luzzi 1990). A case for an essentialist account of humor, and a refutation of the arguments against it, is presented in(Attardo 1994. By and large, linguists (as well as scholars from most disciplines) have operated on the assumption that humor is universal (cf. Apte 1985).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

[IJHR = HUMOR. International Journal of Humor Research]
Apte, M.
1985 Humor and Laughter. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Attardo, S.
1988 Trends in European humor research: towards a text model. IJHR 1(4): 349–369. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1994 Linguistic theories of humor. Mouton De Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995 Review of Norrick 1993. IJHR 8(1): 79–83.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., D.H. Attardo, P. Baltes, & M.J. Petray
1994 The linear organization of jokes: analysis of two thousand texts. IJHR 7(1): 27–54. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S. & V. Raskin
1991 Script theory revisited: joke similarity and joke representation model. IJHR, 4(3–4): 293–347. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Aubouin, E.
1948 Technique et psychologie du comique. Marseilles: OFEP.Google Scholar
Bergson, H.
1901 Le rire. Essai sur la signification du comique. Presses University de France.Google Scholar
Binsted, K. & G. Ritchie
1994 An implemented model of punning riddles. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), Seattle.Google Scholar
1997 Computational rules for generating punning riddles. IJHR 10(1): 25–76.Google Scholar
Chlopicki, W.
1987 An application of the script theory of semantics to the analysis of selected Polish humorous short stories. M. A. Thesis. Purdue University.
1994 The role of Relevance in the Interpretation of Verbal Jokes: A Pragmatic Analysis. IJHR 7(1): 87–93.Google Scholar
Crawford, M.
1989 Humor in conversational contexts: beyond biases in the study of gender and humor. In R.K. Hunger (ed.) Representations: Social Constructions of Gender: 155–166 . Amityville.Google Scholar
1995 Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Curcó, C
1995 Some observations on the pragmatics of humorous interpretations: a relevance theoretic approach. UCL Working papers in Linguistics 7: 27–47.Google Scholar
1996a The implicit expression of attitudes, mutual manifestness, and verbal humor. UCL Working papers in Linguistics 8: 89–99.Google Scholar
1996b Relevance theory and humorous interpretations. In Hulstijn & Nijholt (eds.): 53–68.Google Scholar
Dascal, M.
1985 Language use in jokes and dreams: sociopragmatics vs. psychopragmatics. Language and Communication 5(2): 95–106. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Davies, C.
1990 Ethnic Humor around the World. Indiana University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
De Palma, P. & E.J. Weiner
1990 When a riddle is not a riddle? Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Barcelona.
1992 Riddles: Accessibility and Knowledge Representation. Proceedings of COLING 92: 1121–1125. Nantes.Google Scholar
Dolitsky, M.
1992 Aspects of the unsaid in humor. IJHR 5(1–2): 33–43. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Drew, P.
1987 Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25: 219–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. & M.D. Lampert
1992 Gender differences in the construction of humorous talk. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz & B. Moonwomon (eds.) Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference: 108–117. Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Ferro-Luzzi, G.E.
1990 Tamil jokes and the polythetic-prototype approach to humor. IJHR 3(2): 147–158.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J.
1975 An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 123–131. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1985 Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica 6 (2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Forabosco, G.
1992 Cognitive aspects of the humor process: the concept of incongruity. IJHR 5(1): 45–68. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1994 ‘Seriality’ and appreciation in jokes. IJHR 7(4): 351–375.Google Scholar
Freud, S.
1905 Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewussten. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.J.
1989 Understanding and literal meaning. Cognitive science 13: 243–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 The poetics of mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R.
1988 On The Informativeness Requirement. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(5/6): 547–565. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1991 On the cognitive aspects of the joke. Journal of Pragmatics 16(5): 465–485. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995 On irony and negation. Discourse processes 19: 239–264. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. & O. Fein
1996 Irony comprehension: the graded salience hypothesis. Paper presented at the 12th Twente Workshop on Language and Technology.
Graham, E., M.J. Papa & G.P. Brooks
1992 Functions of humor in conversation: Conceptualizations and measurement. Western Journal of Communication 56 (2): 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greimas, A.J.
1996 Sémantique structurale. Larousse.Google Scholar
Grice, P.
1989 Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hausmann, F.J.
1974 Studien zu einer Linguistik des Wortspiels. Das Wortspiel im Canard Enchainé. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. & A. Nijholt
(eds.) 1996 Automatic Interpretation and Generation of Verbal Humor. University of Twente.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
1979 A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnomethodology: 79–96. Irvington.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985 An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 3: 25–34. Academic.Google Scholar
Jenkins, M.M.
1985 What’s so funny? Joking among Women. In S. Bremmer, N. Caskey & B. Moonwomon (eds.) Proceedings of the First Berkeley Women and Language Conference: 135–151. University of California.Google Scholar
Jodlowiec, M.
1991 What makes jokes tick. University College London. Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 241–253.Google Scholar
Keith-Spiegel, P.
1972 Early conception of humor: varieties and issues. In J.H. Goldstein & P.E. Mcghee (eds.) The Psychology of Humor: 3–39. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B.
(ed.) 1976 Speech Play: Research and resources for studying linguistic creativity. University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H.
1986 Scherzen und Lachen in Gesprachen von Frauen und Mannern. Der Deutschunterricht: Beitrage zu Seiner Praxis und Wissenschaftlichen Grundlegung 38(3): 16–28.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R.
1975 Language and Woman’s Place. Harper and Row. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Loehr, D.
1996 An integration of a pun generator with a natural language robot. In Hulstijn & Nijholt (eds.): 161–171.Google Scholar
Long, D.L. & A.C. Graesser
1988 Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes 11: 35–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcghee, P.
1979 Humor: Its Origin and Development. Freeman.Google Scholar
Morain, G.G.
1991 X-raying the international funny bone: A study exploring differences in the perception of humor across cultures. In J.E. Alatis (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1991: 397–408.Google Scholar
Morin, V.
1966 L’histoire drôle. Communications. 8: 102–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morreall, J.
1983 Taking Laughter Seriously. State University of New York.Google Scholar
1987 The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. State University of New York.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, M.
1988 On Humor. Its Nature and its Place in Modern Society. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Navon, D.
1988 The seemingly appropriate but virtually inappropriate. Note on characteristics of jokes. Poetics 17: 207–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, D.L.F.
1993 Humor Scholarship: A Research Bibliography. Greenwood.Google Scholar
Norrick, N.R.
1993 Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, V.
1979 Semantic mechanisms of humor. In C. Chiarello et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 325–335. Berkeley Linguistics Society.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985 Semantic mechanisms of humor. Reidel.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1986 Script-based semantics. In EllisD.G. & W.A. Donohue (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse Processes: 23–61. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1985 Round Table on Frame Semanties. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2–3).Google Scholar
Raskin, V. & S. Attardo
1994 Non-literalness and non-bonafide in language. An approach to formal and computational treatments of humor. Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1): 31–69. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E.H.
1973 On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T.E. Moore (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language: 111–144. Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruch, W., S. Attardo
& V. Raskin 1993 Towards an empirical verification of the General Theory of Verbal Humor. IJHR 6 (2): 123–136.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
1972 On some puns: with some intimations. In R.W. Shuy (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects: 135–144 . Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1974 An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (eds.) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking: 337–353. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, J.
1978 Oh! That’s a pun and I didn’t mean it. Semiotica 22 (3–4): 335–350.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985 Puns and jokes. In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 3: 213–221. Academic.Google Scholar
1992 Verbal play. In W. Bright (ed.) International encyclopedia of linguistics Vol. 4: 220–222. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1993 Language in society 22: 217–233–— 1996 Review of Attardo 1994 Language 72(1): 132–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobkowiak, W.
1991 Metaphonology of English Paronomasic Puns. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1981 Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics: 295–318. Academic.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1986 Relevance. Harvard University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Suls, J.
1972 A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In J.H. Goldstein & P.E. Mcghee (eds.) The Psychology of Humor: 81–100. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
1984 Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1986 That’s Not What I Meant! Ballantine.Google Scholar
1990 You Just Don’t Understand. Ballantine.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1994 Talking from 9 to 5. Morrow.Google Scholar
Weiner, E.J.
1996 Why is a riddle not like a metaphor?In Hulstijn & Nijholt (eds.): 111–119.Google Scholar
Weiner, E.J. & P. De PALMA
1993 Some pragmatic features of lexical ambiguity and simple riddles. Language and Communication 13(3): 182–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, P.
1989 Von der Struktur des Witzes zum Witz der Struktur: Studien zur Technik der Pointierung. Winter.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, H.
1988 How to pull strings with words. Deceptive violations in the garden-path joke. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 323–337. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Zajdman, A.
1991 Contextualization of canned jokes in discourse. IJHR 4(1): 23–40. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ziv, A.
1984 Personality and Sense of Humor. Springer.Google Scholar
1988 National styles of humor. Greenwood.  BoPGoogle Scholar