Salvatore Attardo
Table of contents

The conceptual field of ‘humor’ is broad and only few areas within it are well determined. Attempts at defining and subcategorizing within the field areas such as ‘humor’ vs. ‘comedy’ or ‘ridicule’ have by and large failed. Lexicographic studies have only highlighted the differences and fluidity of the classifications used by various languages (Attardo 1994: 2–7). The term ‘humor’ has emerged as a technical term covering anything that is (or may) be perceived as funny, amusing, or laughable. This does not preclude the possibility of establishing subcategorizations in certain specific areas, e.g., tendentious humor, or ‘genres’ such as puns, jokes, etc. It should be noted, however, that terms such as ‘pun’ and ‘joke’ are not technical terms and are ultimately fuzzy. On these grounds, some have challenged the possibility of providing a unitary account of humor (e.g., Ferro-Luzzi 1990). A case for an essentialist account of humor, and a refutation of the arguments against it, is presented in(Attardo 1994. By and large, linguists (as well as scholars from most disciplines) have operated on the assumption that humor is universal (cf. Apte 1985).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


[IJHR = HUMOR. International Journal of Humor Research]
Apte, M.
1985Humor and Laughter. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Attardo, S.
1988Trends in European humor research: towards a text model. IJHR 1(4): 349–369. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1994Linguistic theories of humor. Mouton De Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995Review of Norrick 1993. IJHR 8(1): 79–83.Google Scholar
Attardo, S., D.H. Attardo, P. Baltes, & M.J. Petray
1994The linear organization of jokes: analysis of two thousand texts. IJHR 7(1): 27–54. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Attardo, S. & V. Raskin
1991Script theory revisited: joke similarity and joke representation model. IJHR, 4(3–4): 293–347. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Aubouin, E.
1948Technique et psychologie du comique. Marseilles: OFEP.Google Scholar
Bergson, H.
1901Le rire. Essai sur la signification du comique. Presses University de France.Google Scholar
Binsted, K. & G. Ritchie
1994An implemented model of punning riddles. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), Seattle.Google Scholar
1997Computational rules for generating punning riddles. IJHR 10(1): 25–76.Google Scholar
Chlopicki, W.
1987An application of the script theory of semantics to the analysis of selected Polish humorous short stories. M. A. Thesis. Purdue University.
1994The role of Relevance in the Interpretation of Verbal Jokes: A Pragmatic Analysis. IJHR 7(1): 87–93.Google Scholar
Crawford, M.
1989Humor in conversational contexts: beyond biases in the study of gender and humor. In R.K. Hunger (ed.) Representations: Social Constructions of Gender: 155–166 . Amityville.Google Scholar
1995Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Curcó, C
1995Some observations on the pragmatics of humorous interpretations: a relevance theoretic approach. UCL Working papers in Linguistics 7: 27–47.Google Scholar
1996aThe implicit expression of attitudes, mutual manifestness, and verbal humor. UCL Working papers in Linguistics 8: 89–99.Google Scholar
1996bRelevance theory and humorous interpretations. In Hulstijn & Nijholt (eds.): 53–68.Google Scholar
Dascal, M.
1985Language use in jokes and dreams: sociopragmatics vs. psychopragmatics. Language and Communication 5(2): 95–106. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Davies, C.
1990Ethnic Humor around the World. Indiana University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
De Palma, P. & E.J. Weiner
1990When a riddle is not a riddle? Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Barcelona.
1992Riddles: Accessibility and Knowledge Representation. Proceedings of COLING 92: 1121–1125. Nantes.Google Scholar
Dolitsky, M.
1992Aspects of the unsaid in humor. IJHR 5(1–2): 33–43. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Drew, P.
1987Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25: 219–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. & M.D. Lampert
1992Gender differences in the construction of humorous talk. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz & B. Moonwomon (eds.) Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference: 108–117. Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Ferro-Luzzi, G.E.
1990Tamil jokes and the polythetic-prototype approach to humor. IJHR 3(2): 147–158.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J.
1975An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 123–131. Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1985Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica 6 (2): 222–254.Google Scholar
Forabosco, G.
1992Cognitive aspects of the humor process: the concept of incongruity. IJHR 5(1): 45–68. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1994‘Seriality’ and appreciation in jokes. IJHR 7(4): 351–375.Google Scholar
Freud, S.
1905Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewussten. Berlin.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.J.
1989Understanding and literal meaning. Cognitive science 13: 243–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994The poetics of mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giora, R.
1988On The Informativeness Requirement. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(5/6): 547–565. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1991On the cognitive aspects of the joke. Journal of Pragmatics 16(5): 465–485. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995On irony and negation. Discourse processes 19: 239–264. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Giora, R. & O. Fein
1996Irony comprehension: the graded salience hypothesis. Paper presented at the 12th Twente Workshop on Language and Technology.
Graham, E., M.J. Papa & G.P. Brooks
1992Functions of humor in conversation: Conceptualizations and measurement. Western Journal of Communication 56 (2): 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greimas, A.J.
1996Sémantique structurale. Larousse.Google Scholar
Grice, P.
1989Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hausmann, F.J.
1974Studien zu einer Linguistik des Wortspiels. Das Wortspiel im Canard Enchainé. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. & A. Nijholt
(eds.) 1996Automatic Interpretation and Generation of Verbal Humor. University of Twente.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
1979A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnomethodology: 79–96. Irvington.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 3: 25–34. Academic.Google Scholar
Jenkins, M.M.
1985What’s so funny? Joking among Women. In S. Bremmer, N. Caskey & B. Moonwomon (eds.) Proceedings of the First Berkeley Women and Language Conference: 135–151. University of California.Google Scholar
Jodlowiec, M.
1991What makes jokes tick. University College London. Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 241–253.Google Scholar
Keith-Spiegel, P.
1972Early conception of humor: varieties and issues. In J.H. Goldstein & P.E. Mcghee (eds.) The Psychology of Humor: 3–39. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B.
(ed.) 1976Speech Play: Research and resources for studying linguistic creativity. University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H.
1986Scherzen und Lachen in Gesprachen von Frauen und Mannern. Der Deutschunterricht: Beitrage zu Seiner Praxis und Wissenschaftlichen Grundlegung 38(3): 16–28.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R.
1975Language and Woman’s Place. Harper and Row. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Loehr, D.
1996An integration of a pun generator with a natural language robot. In Hulstijn & Nijholt (eds.): 161–171.Google Scholar
Long, D.L. & A.C. Graesser
1988Wit and humor in discourse processing. Discourse Processes 11: 35–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcghee, P.
1979Humor: Its Origin and Development. Freeman.Google Scholar
Morain, G.G.
1991X-raying the international funny bone: A study exploring differences in the perception of humor across cultures. In J.E. Alatis (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 1991: 397–408.Google Scholar
Morin, V.
1966L’histoire drôle. Communications. 8: 102–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morreall, J.
1983Taking Laughter Seriously. State University of New York.Google Scholar
1987The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor. State University of New York.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mulkay, M.
1988On Humor. Its Nature and its Place in Modern Society. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Navon, D.
1988The seemingly appropriate but virtually inappropriate. Note on characteristics of jokes. Poetics 17: 207–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, D.L.F.
1993Humor Scholarship: A Research Bibliography. Greenwood.Google Scholar
Norrick, N.R.
1993Conversational Joking: Humor in Everyday Talk. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, V.
1979Semantic mechanisms of humor. In C. Chiarello et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 325–335. Berkeley Linguistics Society.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985Semantic mechanisms of humor. Reidel.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1986Script-based semantics. In EllisD.G. & W.A. Donohue (eds.) Contemporary Issues in Language and Discourse Processes: 23–61. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1985Round Table on Frame Semanties. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2–3).Google Scholar
Raskin, V. & S. Attardo
1994Non-literalness and non-bonafide in language. An approach to formal and computational treatments of humor. Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1): 31–69. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Rosch, E.H.
1973On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T.E. Moore (ed.) Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language: 111–144. Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruch, W., S. Attardo
& V. Raskin 1993Towards an empirical verification of the General Theory of Verbal Humor. IJHR 6 (2): 123–136.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
1972On some puns: with some intimations. In R.W. Shuy (ed.) Sociolinguistics: Current Trends and Prospects: 135–144 . Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1974An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (eds.) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking: 337–353. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, J.
1978Oh! That’s a pun and I didn’t mean it. Semiotica 22 (3–4): 335–350.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985Puns and jokes. In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis Vol. 3: 213–221. Academic.Google Scholar
1992Verbal play. In W. Bright (ed.) International encyclopedia of linguistics Vol. 4: 220–222. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1993Language in society 22: 217–233–— 1996 Review of Attardo 1994 Language 72(1): 132–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobkowiak, W.
1991Metaphonology of English Paronomasic Puns. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1981Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics: 295–318. Academic.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1986Relevance. Harvard University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Suls, J.
1972A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In J.H. Goldstein & P.E. Mcghee (eds.) The Psychology of Humor: 81–100. Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
1984Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends. Ablex.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1986That’s Not What I Meant! Ballantine.Google Scholar
1990You Just Don’t Understand. Ballantine.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1994Talking from 9 to 5. Morrow.Google Scholar
Weiner, E.J.
1996Why is a riddle not like a metaphor?In Hulstijn & Nijholt (eds.): 111–119.Google Scholar
Weiner, E.J. & P. De PALMA
1993Some pragmatic features of lexical ambiguity and simple riddles. Language and Communication 13(3): 182–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, P.
1989Von der Struktur des Witzes zum Witz der Struktur: Studien zur Technik der Pointierung. Winter.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, H.
1988How to pull strings with words. Deceptive violations in the garden-path joke. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 323–337. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Zajdman, A.
1991Contextualization of canned jokes in discourse. IJHR 4(1): 23–40. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ziv, A.
1984Personality and Sense of Humor. Springer.Google Scholar
1988National styles of humor. Greenwood.  BoPGoogle Scholar