Rhetoric

Manfred Kienpointner
Table of contents

Rhetoric is a discipline with a long tradition: about 2500 years have gone by since it was first established in ancient Greece. Within this time span, rhetoric has been the subject of approval and condemnation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Anscombre, J. & O. Ducrot
1983L’argumentation dans la langue. Mardaga. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Antos, G
1982Grundlagen einer Theorie des Formulierens. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, R.A
. & W.U. Dressler 1981Introduction to text linguistics. Longman.Google Scholar
Billig, M
1987Arguing and thinking. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J
1988Ethnolinguistics and Kiswahili rhetoric. Working Papers in Kiswahili 3: 1–50.Google Scholar
Braet, A
1984De klassieke statusleer in modern perspectief. Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S. Levinson
1987Politeness. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Curtius, E.R
1948Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. Francke.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A
. & W. Kintsch 1983Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, J
et al. 1970Rhétorique générale. Larousse.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O
1972Dire et ne pas dire. Hermann.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, O. et al.
1980Les mots du discours. Minuit.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Eco, U
1972Einführung in die Semiotik. Fink.Google Scholar
Eggs, E
1984Die Rhetorik des Aristoteles. Lang.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. & R. Grootendorst
1984Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Foris. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H
1992Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst & T. Kruiger
1987Handbook of argumentation theory. Foris.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair & C.A. Willard
(eds.) 1987Argumentation. Foris.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 1991Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Argumentation. Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Festinger, L
1957A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeley, A.J
1986Argumentation and debate. Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Galtung, J
1985Struktur, kultur und intellektueller Stil. In A. Wierlacher (ed.) Das Fremde und das Eigene: 151–193. Iudicum Verlag.Google Scholar
Geissner, H
(ed.) 1978Rhetorik. Bayrischer Schulbuchverlag.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1988Sprechwissenschaft. Scriptor.Google Scholar
Genette, G
1972La rhétorique restreinte. In Figures III: 21–40. Seuil.Google Scholar
Govier, T
1987Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Foris.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P
1975Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: 41–58. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J
1981Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, A
(ed.) 1983Theorie der Metapher. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, R
1989Argumentation, information and interaction. University of Göteborg.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C.I., I.L. Janis & H.H. Kelley
1957Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R
1971Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In Selected writings, vol. 2: 239–259. Mouton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kibédi-Varga, A
1970Rhétorique et littérature. Didier.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M
1983Argumentationsanalyse. Sprachwissenschaftliches Institut Innsbruck.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1992Alltagslogik. Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Klein, J
1987Die konklusiven Sprechhandlungen. Gunter Narr. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kopperschmidt, J
1976Allgemeine Rhetorik. Kohlhammer.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1989Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse. Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1990Rhetorik, vol. 1. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1991Rhetorik, vol. 2. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Leech, G
1983Principles of pragmatics. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
De Man, P
1991Rhetorik der Tropen. In J. Kopperschmidt (ed.): 170–188.Google Scholar
Meyer, M
1986De la problématologie. Mardaga.Google Scholar
Murphy, J.J
1974Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Öhlschläger, G
1979Linguistische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der Argumentation. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’keefe, D
1990Persuasion. Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ortner, H
1992Auf dem Weg zu einer realistischen Theorie des Schreibens. In P. Herdina (ed.) Methodenfragen der Geisteswissenschaften: 15–65. Sprachwissenschaftliches Institut Innsbruck.Google Scholar
De Pater, W.A
1965Les Topiques d’Aristotle et la dialectique platonicienne. St.Paul.Google Scholar
Perelman, C
1979Juridische Logik als Argumentationslehre. Alber.Google Scholar
1980Das Reich der Rhetorik. Beck.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Perelman, C. & L. Olbrechts
-TYTECA 1983 [1958] Traité de l’argumentation, la nouvelle rhétorique. Ed. University de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Plett, H.F
1975Textwissenschaft und Textanalyse. Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
Poyatos, F
1992Advances in nonverbal communication. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schanze, H. & J. Kopperschmidt
(ed.) 1989Rhetorik und Philosophie. Fink.Google Scholar
SHI-XU
1991Contradistinctive argumentation and its use in conversation. In F. Van Eemeren et al. (eds.), vol. 2: 696–708.Google Scholar
Shotter, J
1993Cultural politics of everyday life. Open University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S.E
1958The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S.E., R. Rieke & A. Janik
1984An introduction to reasoning. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Trapp, R
(ed.) 1990The empirical study of argumentation. Special issue, Argumentation 4(2).Google Scholar
Viehweg, T
1974Topik und Jurisprudenz. Beck.Google Scholar
Walker, G.B
1987Communicating across cultures. In F. Van Eemeren et al. (eds.) vol. 3B: 238–250.Google Scholar
Walton, D.N
1989Informal logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania State University Press.[See also: Argumentation theory; Discourse analysis; Literary pragmatics; Stylistics]Google Scholar