Nation, empire, translation

Roberto Valdeón
Table of contents

Nation is a highly problematic concept. Geller has suggested two approaches to deal with it, the cultural and the voluntaristic (2006: 6–7), although he admits that neither is satisfactory and points out that nations can only be defined in the age of nationalism (2006: 54). Thus, the concept of the modern nation can be a recent European construct, but, on the other hand, the role of language as a key to define/create nations is not. Similarly Translation Studies might be a modern discipline but the role of translation in the construction of empires is not new (Robinson 1997: 9). The Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Arabs, the Chinese, the Ottomans and many others promoted their nations through the use of translation, as their respective empires expanded through military conquest and, later, trade (see Scientific translation).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Anderson, Benedict
2006/1983Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalim. London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Arrojo, Rosemary
2002/1999“Interpretative as possessive love. Hélène Cixous, Clarice Lispector and the ambivalence of fidelity.” In Post-colonial Translation. Theory and Practice, Susan Bassnett & Harish Trivedi (eds), 141–161. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter
2007“Cultures of translation in early modern Europe.” In Cultural Translation in Early Modern Europe, Peter Burke & R. Po-chia Hsia (eds), 7–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  TSBGoogle Scholar
Cheyfitz, Eric
1997The Poetics of Imperialism. Translation and Colonization from the Tempest to Tarzan. Amsterdam: University of Pennsylvania Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Corbett, John
1999Written in the Language of the Scottish Nation. A History of Literary Translation into Scots. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Michael
1996Translating Ireland: Translation, Languages, Cultures. Cork: Cork University Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Fabian, Johannes
1986Language and Colonial Power: The Appropriation of Swahili in the Former Belgian Congo 1880–1938. Berkeley: University of California Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen
1991Marvellous Possessions. The Wonder of the New World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardt, Michael & Negri, Antonio
2000Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Ernest
2006/1983Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kothari, Rita & Wakabayashi, Judy
2009“Introduction.” In Decentering Translation Studies. India and Beyond, Rita Kothari & Judy Wakabayashi (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins  TSB. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lezra, Jacques
2005“Nationum Origo.” In Nation, Language, and the Ethics of Translation, Sandra Bermann & Michael Wood (eds), 203–228. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Lung, Rachel
2011Interpreters in Early Imperial China. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo  TSBGoogle Scholar
Nama, Charles Atangana
2009“A history of translation and interpretation in the littoral province of Cameroon.” In Perspectives on Translation and Interpretation in Cameroon, Emmanuel H. Chia & Joseph C. Suh (eds), 47–56. Bamenda, CMR: Langaa.Google Scholar
Rafael, Vicente
1993Contracting Colonialism: Translation and Christian Conversion in Tagalog -Society under Early Spanish Rule. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Douglas
1997Translation and Empire. Manchester: St. Jerome.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Tageldin, Shaden M
2011Disarming Words: Empire and the Seductions of Translation in Egypt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria
2007Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Manchester: St. Jerome.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
1998The Scandals of Translation. London: Routledge. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Weissbort, Daniel, & Eysteinsson, Astradur
2006Translation Theory and Practice: A Historical Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar