A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction

Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Arndt, H. and R.W. Janney
(1985) Politeness revisited: Cross-modal supportive strategies. IRAL XXIII-4: 281-300.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. and S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caplow, T
(1968) Two against one: Coalitions in triads. Englewood Cliffs (N.J.): Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H. and T.B. Carlson
(1982) Hearers and speech acts. Language 58(2): 332-373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F
(1981) ‘Poison to your soul’: Thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational routine. La Haye: Mouton, pp. 69-91.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Craig, R.T., K. Tracy and F. Spisak
(1986) The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research 12(4): 437-468. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J
(1996) Status and power in verbal interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
de Fornel, M
(1986) Catégorisation, identification et référence en analyse de conversation. Lexique 5: 161-195.Google Scholar
(1989) Actes de langage et théorie du prototype: L’exemple du compliment. Cahiers de Praxématique 2: 37-49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Sémantique du prototype et analyse de conversation. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 11: 159-178.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. and W. Nolen
(1981) The association of deference with linguistic forms. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 93-109.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Glover, K.D
(1995) A prototype view of context and linguistic behavior: Context prototypes and talk. Journal of Pragmatics 23(2): 137-156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1974) Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Golopentia, S
(1988) Interaction et histoire conversationnelle. In J. Cosnier et al.. (eds.), Echanges sur la conversation. Paris: CNRS, pp. 69-81.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C
(1981) Conversational organisation: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Held, G
(1989) On the role of maximization in verbal politeness. Multilingua 8(2/3): 167-206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jeanneret, Th
(1991) Fabrication du texte conversationnel et conversation pluri-locuteurs. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 12: 83-102.Google Scholar
(1996) Relatives co-énoncées: Conversation et syntaxe. Scolia 5: 343-360.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C
(1990, 1992, 1994) Les interactions verbales, vol. I-II-III. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. and C. Plantin
(eds.) (1995) Le trilogue. Lyon: PUL.Google Scholar
Labov, W. and D. Fanshel
(1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, R
(1973) The logic of politeness. Papers from the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 183-228.  BoP
Leech, G
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lerner, G.H
(1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20(3): 441-458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mao, Lu Ming, R
(1994) Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451-486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcoccia, M
(1995) Les interviews du couple: Réflexions sur le rôle de porte-parole. In C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni and C. Plantin (eds.), 1995: Le trilogue, 80-107.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y
(1988) Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12(4): 403-426. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Meier, A.J
(1995) Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 24(3): 381-392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penman, R
(1990) Facework & politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9(1/2): 15-38. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pike, K.L
(1975) On kinesic triadic relations in turn-taking. Semiotica 13(4): 389-394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K.L. and I. Lowe
(1969) Pronominal reference in English conversation and discourse – A group theoretical treatment. Folia Linguistica 3: 68-106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Preisler, B. and H. Haberland
(1994) Review of M.Sifianou, Politeness phenomena in England and Greece: A cross-cultural perspective . Journal of Pragmatics 22(2): 227-232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roulet, E
(1995) L’analyse du dialogue dans une apprache modulaire des structures du discours: l’exemple du dialogue romanesque. In F. Hundsnurscher & E. Weigand (eds.), Future perspectives of dialogue analysis. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, pp. 1-34.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. et al. (1985) L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne/Francfort-sur-Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sacks, H
(1984) On doing ‘being ordinary’. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structure of social action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 412-429.Google Scholar
(1992) Lectures on conversation, vol. I-II. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff and G. Jefferson
(1978) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization on conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 7-55. [earlier version 1974, Language 50: 696-735] . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70(4): 1075-1095. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1995) Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction. In P.T. Haves & G. Psathas (eds.), Situated order. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America, pp. 31-42.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. and R.M. Coulthard
(1975) Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Speier, M
(1972) Some conversational problems for interactional analysis. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction. New York: The Free Press, pp. 397-427.Google Scholar
Traverso, V
(1995) Gestion des échanges dans la conversation à trois participants. In C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni & C. Plantin (eds.) 1995: Le trilogue, 29-53.Google Scholar
Vincent, D
(1995) Du dialogue au soliloque: Des interactions plus ou moins conversationnelles. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 16: 53-68.Google Scholar
Zamouri, S
(1995) La formation de coalitions dans les conversations triadiques. In C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni & C. Plantin (eds.) 1995: Le trilogue, 54-79.Google Scholar