Grammatical Pragmatics: Power in Akan judicial discourse

Samuel Gyasi Obeng

Abstract

This paper explores some pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic aspects of the Akan (Ghana, West Africa) native court judicial discourse. It is argued that court officials and litigants use specific content and functional words, idioms and other implicit expressions, as well as phonetic resources like mezzoforte and pianissimo loudness to express power, politeness and a range of attitudes and relationships such as distancing, anger, closeness, and politeness phenomena. Finally, the paper demonstrates that some judicial communication strategies employed by the interactional participants to indicate power in the native courts, may also be found in ordinary Akan conversation.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Adelswärd, Viveka, Karin Aronsson, and Linda Jönsson
(1987) The unequal distribution of interactional space: Dominance and control in courtroom interaction. Text 7.4: 313–346.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. American anthropologist 4.6: 24–29.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
(1978) Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena. In Esther Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 256–311.Google Scholar
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, Mary I.
(1991) When a response is not an answer: Understanding conflict in non-native legal testimony. Multilingua. 10.3.: 275–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Kadt, Elizabeth
(1998) The concept of face and its applicability to the Zulu language. Journal of pragmatics 29: 173–191. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1967) Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Ervin
(1972) On face work: On analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In J. Laver and S. Hutcheson (eds.), Communication in face to face interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 319–46.Google Scholar
Goldman, L.R.
(1986) A case of ‘questions ‘ and a question of ‘case ‘. Text. 6.4: 349–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
(1995) Pragmatics and power. Journal of pragmatics 23.2: 117–135. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
(1996) Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse and society 7.4: 481–497. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth
(1997) Honorific possession: Power and language in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Language in Society 26.2: 247–268. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Labov, William & D. Fanshel
(1977) Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
(1989) The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua 8.2/3: 101–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
(1988) Re-examination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of pragmatics 12.4: 403–426. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1989) Politeness and conversational universals: Observations from Japan. Multilingua 8: 207–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
(1988) The pragmatics of kinship terms in Kituba. Multilingua 7.4: 441–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nwoye, Onuigbo
(1992) Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variation of the notion of face. Journal of pragmatics 18: 309–328. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Obeng, Samuel Gyasi
(1996) The proverb as a mitigating and politeness strategy in Akan discourse. Anthropological linguistics. 38.4: 521–549.Google Scholar
(1997) Communication strategies: Persuasion and politeness in Akan judicial discourse. Text 17.1: 25–51.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1998) Prosody in Judicial discourse: Phonetic detail of disagreement tokens. Sociolinguistics Circle Meeting. Indiana University, Bloomington, November 1998.
(1999) Apologies in Akan Discourse. Journal of pragmatics 31.5: 709–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(in press) Leading litigants into speaking the unspeakable: A linguistic analysis of cross-examination strategies in Akan traditional courts. In Christina Jones (ed.) The impact of court administrators in Africa on judicial proceedings
Obeng, Samuel Gyasi and Beverly Stoeltje
(in preparation) Disagreement in Akan dispute settlements. Indiana University, Bloomington.
Oyetade, Solomon Oluwole
(1995) A sociolinguistic analysis of address forms in Yoruba Language in society 24.4: 515–535. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Bethy
(1988) Power and politeness in conversation: Encoding of face-threatening acts at church business meetings. Anthropological linguistics 30.1: 68–93.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stewart, John
(1989) Kwa languages. In John Bendor-Samuel (ed.), The Niger-Congo languages. Summer Institute of Linguistics: Lanham, MD. University Press of America.Google Scholar
Stoeltje, Beverly
(1999) Performing litigation at the queen mother’s court. Mimeograph.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny A.
(1985) The language of power: Towards a dynamic pragmatics. Journal of pragmatics 9: 765–783. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T.
(1998) On the analysis of parliamentary debates on immigration. Working paper for the project Racism at the top. Unpublished Manuscript.
Wetzel, Patricia J.
(1993) The language of vertical relationships and linguistic analysis. Multilingua 12.4: 387–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
(1985) Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Journal of pragmatics 9: 145–78. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wood Linda A. and Rolf O. Kroger
(1991) Politeness and forms of address. Journal of language and social psychology 10.3: 145–168. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Yankah, Kwesi
(1991) Oratory in Akan society. Discourse and society 2: 47–64. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1995) Speaking for the chief. ]kyeame and the politics of Akan royal oratory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar