Conventions of language

Yueguo Gu
Table of contents

Lewis (1969) opens his now classic study of convention with an observation to the effect that the thesis that language is ruled by convention is accepted by people who do not bother to give it a second thought. He is perhaps the first philosopher who has opted to do the ‘dirty work’. More than three decades have gone by since Lewis’s study. But his observation, broadly speaking, remains valid. As will become apparent later, although the concept of convention has been given a crucial role in the theorization of both speech acts and implicature, it has received in most cases no more than passing comments. In contrast with its allocated role of importance, it has remained seriously understudied. This article is aimed at the following objectives: (1) to make a critical review of the pertinent literature, with the issue of conventionality of speech acts and implicature as its primary concern; (2) to pinpoint where the difficulties lie in the study of conventions of language; and (3) to explore the potential research directions in the foreseeable future.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Alston, W.P.
1991 Searle on illocutionary acts. In E. Lepore & R. Van Gulick (eds.): 57–80. Google Scholar
2000 Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
Atkinson, J.M. & J. Heritage
(eds.) 1984 Structures of Social Action. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Austin, J.L.
1980[1962] How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Avramides, A.
1989 Meaning and Mind. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bach, K. & R.M. Harnish
1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bach, K.
1994 Conversational implicature. Mind and Language 9: 124–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J.
1979 Linguistic Behaviour. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Berlin, I. et al.
1973 Essays on J.L. Austin. Clarendon Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bever, T.G., J.M. Carroll & L.A. Miller
(eds.) 1984 Talking Minds: The Study of Language in Cognitive Science. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, A. & J.C. Cutting
2002 Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processing. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 433–456. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D.
1992 Understanding Utterances. Blackwell Publishing.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, G.
1995 Speakers, Listeners, and Communication. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.L.
1975 The Evolution of Behavior. W.W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & S. Levinson
1978 Universals of language usage: politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (ed.) Questions and Politeness: 56–324. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Button, G. & J.R.E. Lee
(eds.) 1987 Talk and Social Organization. Multilingual Matters Ltd. Google Scholar
Calhoun, C., J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaff & I. Virk
(eds.) 2002 Contemporary Sociological Theory. Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar
Carston, R.
1988 Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics.In R. Kempson (ed.) Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality: 155–181. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W.
1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H.
1979 Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology 11: 430–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Using Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, P.R., J. Morgan & M.E. Pollack
(eds.) 1990 Intentions in Communication. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cooren, F. & R.E. Sanders
2002 Implicatures: a schematic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 34(8): 1045–1067. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Corliss, R.L.
1981 What determines a pragmatic implication? Southern Journal of Philosophy 19(1): 37–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, M.
1977 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cranach, M. Von & R. Harre
(eds.) 1982 The Analysis of Action. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Cranach, M. Von, U. Kalbarmatten, K. Indermuhler & B. Gugler
1982 Goal-Directed Action. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A.
1997 Intonation, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dascal, M.
1977 Conversational relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 1: 309–328. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D.
1985 Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
Davis, S.
1980 Perlocution. In J. Searle et al. (eds.): 37–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, W.A.
1992 Speaker meaning. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 223–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eco, U.
1979 A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press. Google Scholar
Engler, R.
1995 Iconicity and/or arbitrariness. In R. Simone (ed.): 39–46. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Fann, K.T.
1969 Symposium on J.L. Austin. Routledge & Kegan Paul.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
1985 Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Furberg, M.
1969 Meaning and illocutionary force. In K.T. Fann (ed.): 445–468. Google Scholar
Gazdar, G.
1979 Pragmatics: Implicature Presupposition and Logical Form. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Gentner, D. & B.F. Bowdle
2001 Convention form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol 16(3/4): 223–247. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. Jr
1998 Your wish is my command: convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. In A. Kasher (ed.) Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, vol. 6: Pragmatics: Grammar, Psychology and Sociology: 148–169. Routledge. Google Scholar
Givon, T.
1989 Mind Code and Context. Lawrence Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
1974 Frame Analysis. Harper and Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Grandy, R. & R. Warner
1986 Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions Categories, Ends. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Gu, Y.
1994 Pragmatics and rhetoric: a collaborative approach to conversation. In H. Parret (ed.) Pretending to Communicate: 173–193. Walter de Gruyter.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 The impasse of perlocution. Journal of Pragmatics 20(5): 405–432. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1997 Five ways of handling a bedpan. Text 17(4): 457–475.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1999 Towards a model of situated discourse. In K. Turner (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View: 150–178. Elsevier.  BoPGoogle Scholar
2002 Towards an understanding of workplace discourse: A pilot study for compiling a spoken Chinese corpus of situated discourse. In C. Candlin (ed.) Research and Practice in Professional Discourse: 137–186. City University of Hong Kong Press. Google Scholar
2003 Towards a multiple-goal neo-Grice. The International Journal of Pragmatics 14(Special issue): 45–70. Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1973 Explorations in the Functions of Language. Edward Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
2000[1994] An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. Google Scholar
2001[1978] Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, J.
1986 Logic of conversation as a logic of dialogue. In R. Grandy & R. Warner (eds.): 259–276. Google Scholar
Hodge, R. & G. Kress
1988 Social Semiotics. Polity Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & E.C. Traugott
2001[1993] Grammaticalization. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. Google Scholar
Horn, L.R.
1984 Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Shiffrin (ed.) Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: 11–42. Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar
1991 Given as new: When redundant affirmation isn’t. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, L. & S. Peters
1979 Conventional implicature. In C. Oh & D.A. Dinneen (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition: 1–56. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kasher, A.
1976 Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems. D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1977 What is a theory of use? Journal of Pragmatics 1: 69–84. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1984 Are speech acts conventional? Journal of Pragmatics 8: 65–69. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 1998 Pragmatics: Critical Concepts, vols. 1–6. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Keijzer, F.
2001 Representation and Behavior. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Kress, G.R.
2001 Multimodal Discourse: the Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold. Google Scholar
Leech, G.N.
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. Longman. Google Scholar
Leonardi, P.
1984 On conventions, rules, and speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 71–86. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lepore, E. & R. Van Gulick
(eds.) 1991 John Searle and His Critics. Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar
Levinson, S.
1987 Minimization and conversational inference. In J. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.): 61–129. [Reprinted in A. Kasher (ed.) (1998) Pragmatics: Critical concepts, vol. 4: 545–612. Routledge.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992[1979] Activity type and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at Work: 66–100. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
1997 From outer to inner space: linguistic categories and non-linguistic thinking. In J. Nuyts & E. Pederson (eds.): 13–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Presumptive Meaning. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.K.
1969 Convention — A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Lyons, J.
1985 Semantics. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mcgarty, C.
1999 Categorization in Social Psychology. Sage. Google Scholar
Medin, D.L. & E. Heit
1999 Categorization. In B.M. Bly & D.E. Rumelhart (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Science: 99–144. Academic Press. DOI logo  TSBGoogle Scholar
Mey, J.
1993 Pragmatics: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J.L.
1998 Two types of convention in indirect speech acts. In A. Kasher (ed.), vol. 4: 639–657. Google Scholar
Nuyts, J. & E. Pederson
(eds.) 1997 Language and Conceptualization. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Olson, M.
2002 The logic of collective action. In C. Calhoun et al. (eds.): 126–130. Google Scholar
Parret, H., M. Sbisa & J. Verschueren
(eds.) 1981 Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Parret, H.
(ed.) 1993 Pretending to Communicate. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. Van Orman.
1969 Foreword. In D.K. Lewis: xi–xii.Google Scholar
1980 From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Ramat, A.G.
1995 Iconicity in grammaticalization processes. In R. Simone (ed.): 119–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F.
1980 Some remarks on explicit performatives, indirect speech acts, locutionary meaning and truth-value. In J.R. Searle & E. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch (eds.): 205–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 Meaning and Force. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1989 The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4(4): 295–329. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ritzer, G. & B. Smart
(eds.) 2001 Handbook of Social Theory. Sage. Google Scholar
Sadock, J.M.
1978 On testing for conversational implicature. In P. Cole (ed.) Syntax and Semantics vol. 9: Pragmatics: 291–297. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Schiffer, S.R.
1972 Meaning. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
1987 Remnants of Meaning. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.R.
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979 Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theoryof Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 Meaning, communication, and representation. In R.E. Grandy & R. Warner (eds.) Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends: 209–226. Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
Searle, J.R., E. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch
1980 Speech ActTheory and Pragmatics. D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.R. et al.
1992 (On) Searle on Conversation. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seiler, H.
1995 Iconicity between indicativity and predicativity. In R. Simone (ed.): 141–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simone, R.
(ed.) 1995a Iconicity in Language. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995b Iconic aspects of syntax: a pragmatic approach. In R. Simone (ed.): 153–170. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Smith, N.
(ed.) 1982 Mutual Knowledge. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1982 Mutual knowledge and relevance in theories of comprehension. In N. Smith (ed.): 61–87.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D.D. Wilson.
1986 Relevance. Blackwell Publishing. Google Scholar
Strawson, P.F.
1969[1964]. Intention and convention in speech acts. In K.T. Fann (ed.): 380–400. Google Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.R.
2001[1995] Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory, 2nd ed. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. Google Scholar
Traugott, E.C. & B. Heine
1991 Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 2: Focus on Types of Grmmatical Markers. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Turner, K.
(ed.) 1999 The Semantics and Pragmatics Interface. Elsevier. Google Scholar
Turner, S.
1994 The Social Theory of Practices. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Verschueren, J.
1999 Understanding Pragmatics. Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, J. & M. Bertuccelli-Papi
(eds.) 1987 The Pragmatic Perspective. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Walker, R.C.S.
1975 Conversational implicatures. In S. Blackburn (ed.) Meaning, Reference and Necessity: 133–181. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Warnock, G.J.
1973 Some types of performative utterance. In I. Berlin et al. (eds.): 69–89. Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & D. Sperber
1981 On Grice’s theory of conversation. In Werth (ed.) Conversation and Discourse: 155–78. Croom Helm.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wright, R.A.
1975 Meaningnn and conversational implicature. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts: 363–382. Academic Press. Google Scholar
Ziff, P.
1975 On H.P. Grice’s account of meaning. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovitz (eds.) Semantics: 60–65. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar