Rhetoric

Manfred Kienpointner
Table of contents

Rhetoric is a discipline with a long tradition: about 2500 years have gone by since it was first established in ancient Greece. Within this time span, rhetoric has been the subject of approval and condemnation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Anscombre, J. & O. Ducrot
1983L’argumentation dans la langue. Mardaga. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Antos, G.
1982Grundlagen einer Theorie des Formulierens. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, R.A. & W.U. Dressler
1981Introduction to text linguistics. Longman.Google Scholar
Billig, M.
1987Arguing and thinking. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J.
1988Ethnolinguistics and Kiswahili rhetoric. Working Papers in Kiswahili 3: 1–50.Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. & J. Culpeper
(eds.) 2008Impoliteness: Eclecticism and diaspora. Special Issue of Journal of Politeness Research 4(2). Google Scholar
Braet, A.
1984De klassieke statusleer in modern perspectief. Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J. & O. Ducrot
1987Politeness. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Curtius, E.R.
1948Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. Francke.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A . & W. Kintsch
1983Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dubois, J.
1970Rhétorique générale. Larousse.Google Scholar
Ducrot, O.
1972Dire et ne pas dire. Hermann.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1980Les mots du discours. Minuit.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Eco, U.
1972Einführung in die Semiotik. Fink.Google Scholar
Eggs, E.
1984Die Rhetorik des Aristoteles. Lang.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H.
(ed.) 2002Advances in pragma-dialectics. SicSat/Vale Press.Google Scholar
2010Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. & R. Grootendorst
1984Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Foris.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2004A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. & P. Houtlosser
(eds.) 2000The relation between dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation 14(3) (Special issue).Google Scholar
(eds.) 2006Perspectives on strategic maneuvering. Special Issue of Argumentation 20(4). Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst & F. Snoeck Henkemans
1996Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. , R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair & C.A. Willard
(eds.) 1987Argumentation. Foris.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H . & P. Houtlosser
(eds.) 1991Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Argumentation. Sic Sat.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J.
2009Quid pro nobis. Rhetorical stylistics for argument analysis. In F.H. Van Eemeren (ed.) Examining argumentation in context: 191–220. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L.
1957A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeley, A.J.
1986Argumentation and debate. Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Galtung, J.
1985Struktur, kultur und intellektueller Stil. In A. Wierlacher (ed.) Das Fremde und das Eigene: 151–193. Iudicum Verlag.Google Scholar
Garssen, B.
1997Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief. IFOTT.Google Scholar
Geissner, H.
(ed.) 1978Rhetorik. Bayrischer Schulbuchverlag.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1988Sprechwissenschaft. Scriptor.Google Scholar
Genette, G.
1972La rhétorique restreinte. In Figures III: 21–40. Seuil.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M.A.
2003Let’s Talk: Emotion and the Pragma-Dialectic Model. In F.H. Van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, Ch. A. Willard & A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.): Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 365–368. SicSat.Google Scholar
Govier, T.
1987Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Foris.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: 41–58. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J.
1981Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, A.
(ed.) 1983Theorie der Metapher. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, R.
1989Argumentation, information and interaction. University of Göteborg.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C.I., I.L. Janis & H.H. Kelley
1957Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1971Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In Selected writings, vol. 2: 239–259. Mouton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kibédi-Varga, A.
1970Rhétorique et littérature. Didier.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M.
1983Argumentationsanalyse. Sprachwissenschaftliches Institut Innsbruck.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1992Alltagslogik. Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
1996Vernünftig argumentieren. Rowohlt.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1999Ideologies of politeness. Pragmatics 9(1) (Special issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, J.
1987Die konklusiven Sprechhandlungen. Gunter Narr. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kopperschmidt, J.
1976Allgemeine Rhetorik. Kohlhammer.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1989Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse. Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1990Rhetorik, vol. 1. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1991Rhetorik, vol. 2. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
2000Argumentationstheorie zur Einführung. Junius.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2006Die Neue Rhetorik: Studien zu Chaim Perelman. Fink.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
2002Metaphor. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Koren, R. & R. Amossy
(eds.) 2002Après Perelman: Quelles politiques pour les nouvelles rhétoriques? L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2005Don’t Think of an Elephant! Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Anscombre, J. & O. Ducrot
1980Metaphors We Live by. Chicago University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.
1983Principles of pragmatics. Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M.
1989Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Man, P.
1991Rhetorik der Tropen. In J. Kopperschmidt (ed.):170–188.Google Scholar
Maneli, M.
1994Perelman’s new rhetoric as philosophy and methodology for the next century. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, W.C. , C.M. Matthiessen & S.A. Thompson
1992Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In W.C. Mann & S.A. Thompson (eds.) Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text: 39–78. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M.
1986De la problématologie. Mardaga.Google Scholar
2010La problématologie. Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Murphy, J.J.
1974Rhetoric in the Middle Ages. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Öhlschläger, G.
1979Linguistische Überlegungen zu einer Theorie der Argumentation. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’keefe, D.
2002Persuasion. Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ortner, H.
2000Schreiben und denken. Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Pater, W.A.
1965Les Topiques d’Aristotle et la dialectique platonicienne. St.Paul.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A.
2001Critical applied linguistics. Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Perelman, C.
1979Juridische Logik als Argumentationslehre. Alber.Google Scholar
1980Das Reich der Rhetorik. Beck.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Perelman, C. & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca
1983[1958]Traité de l’argumentation, la nouvelle rhétorique. Ed. Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Plantin, C.
1998Les raisons des émotions. In M. Bondi (ed.) Forms of argumentative discourse: 3–50. Clueb.Google Scholar
2005L’argumentation. Presses universitaires de France. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Plett, H.F.
1975Textwissenschaft und Textanalyse. Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar
2000Systematische Rhetorik. Fink.Google Scholar
Poyatos, F.
1992Advances in nonverbal communication. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Chr.
2002Aristoteles: Rhetorik. Übs. u. erl. 1. Halbband: Einleitung. Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P.
1975La métaphore vive. Seuil.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schanze, H. & J. Kopperschmidt
(eds.) 1989Rhetorik und Philosophie. Fink.Google Scholar
Schmetz, R.
2000L’argumentation selon Perelman. Presses universitaires de Namur.Google Scholar
Shi-Xu
2005A cultural approach to discourse. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shotter, J.
1993Cultural politics of everyday life. Open University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S.E.
1958The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S.E., R. Rieke & A. Janik
1984An introduction to reasoning. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Trapp, R.
(ed.) 1990The empirical study of argumentation. Argumentation 4(2) (Special issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viehweg, T.
1974Topik und Jurisprudenz. Beck.Google Scholar
Walker, G.B.
1987Communicating across cultures. In F. Van Eemeren (eds.), vol. 3B: 238–250.Google Scholar
Walton, D.N.
1989Informal logic. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1992The place of emotion in argument. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
1996Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Walton, D.N., Chr. Reed & F. Macagno
2008Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warnick, B. & S.L. Kline
1992The new rhetoric’s argument schemes: a rhetorical view of practical reasoning. Argumentation and Advocacy 29: 1–15.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
1999Emotions across languages and cultures. Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. & M. Reisigl
2001Discourse and racism. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H.E. Hamilton (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis: 372–397. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Related articles: Argumentation theory, Discourse analysis, Figures of speech, Literary pragmatics, Manipulation, Metalinguistic awareness, Narrative, Social psychology, Stylistics