Personal perspective in TV news interviews

Jennifer Alber, Daniel C. O’Connell and Sabine Kowal


Two interviews by Christiane Amanpour televized September 8, 2000 on CNN, one with Ehud Barak and one with Yasser Arafat were analyzed for indicators of personal perspective. Generally, use of the same indicators as in Suleiman, O’Connell, & Kowal (2002) was confirmed: Number of syllables spoken; use of first-person singular and plural pronominals and second-person pronominals; hesitations; smooth and interruptive turn transitions; and questions posed by interviewees. The interview with Arafat was extraordinarily agonistic, as manifested in his excessive use of first-person singular and second-person pronominals, hesitations, questions, and interruptions. For her part, Amanpour incited the shift to agonism with her provocative questioning. She then moved toward a more personal perspective by speaking proportionally more and by using more first-person singular pronominals and hesitations, all the while still maintaining her professional style of smooth turn transition. The dialogical character of personal perspective is discussed.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Ainsworth-Vaughn, N
(2001) The discourse of medical encounters. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 453-469.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M
(1981) The dialogical imagination: Four essays (trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist; ed. M. Holquist). Austin, TX: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, D., S. Conrad, & R. Reppen
(1998) Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P., & C. Schaffner
(1997) Discourse and politics. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2). London: Sage, pp. 206-230.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H
(1994) Discourse in production. In M.A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 985-1021.Google Scholar
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S., & J. Heritage
(2002) The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A
(1995) Pronominal choice, identity, and solidarity in political discourse. Text 15: 379-410.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Der Tagesspiegel
(2002) Zurechtweisung vom General. (March 31 2002: 5).
Farr, R.M
(1984) Interviewing: An introduction to the social psychology of the interview. In C.I. Cooper & P. Makin (eds.), Psychology for managers (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan, pp. 176-194.Google Scholar
Garrod, S., & M.J. Pickering
(1999) Issues in language processing. In S. Garrod & M.J. Pickering (eds.), Language processing. Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press, pp. 1-11.Google Scholar
Goffman, E
(1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1967) Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Graumann, C
(1989) Perspective setting and taking in verbal interaction. In R. Dietrich & C.F. Graumann (eds.), Language processing in social context. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 95-122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harre, R
(2001) The discursive turn in social psychology. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 608-706.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Holtgraves, T.M
(2002) Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
James, W
(1890/1983) The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kowal, S., H.-C. Barth, H. Egemann, G. Gasulic, C. Kogel, N. Lippold, A. Pfeil, & D.C. O'Connell
(1998) Unterbrechungen in Medieninterviews: Geschlechtstypisches Gesprachsverhalten? Germanistische Linguistik139-140: 279-299.Google Scholar
Kowal, S., & D.C. O'Connell
(1997) Theoretical ideals and their violation: Princess Diana and Martin Bashir in the BBC interview. Pragmatics 7: 309-323.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Interjektionen im Gesprach. Zeitschrift fur Semiotik 24: xx-xx.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R
(1975) Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, P
(1998) Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Maitland, K., & G. Wilson
(1987) Ideological conflict and pronominal resolution. Journal of Pragmatics 11:495-512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, D.C., & S. Kowal
(1998) Orality and literacy in public discourse: An interview of Hannah Arendt. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 543-564. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, D.C., S. Kowal, & E.J. Dill III
in press) A Dialogical Approach to TV News Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 34.
Rommetveit, R
(l974)On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
(1990) On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 83-104.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D
(1994) Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D., D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton
(eds.) (2001) The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, C
(1999) Pronouns and self presentation in public discourse: Yasser Arafat as case study. In Yasir Suleiman (ed.), Language and society in the Middle East and North Africa: Studies in variation and identity. London: Curzon, pp. 104-121.Google Scholar
(2000)  Pronoun use in television interviews: Social interaction and the Middle East peace process . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Suleiman, C., D.C. O'Connell, & S. Kowal
(2002) "If you and I, if we, in this later day, lose that sacred fire..."; Perspective in political interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31:281-299.Google Scholar
Urban, G
(1988) The pronominal pragmatics of nuclear war discourse. Multilingua 7: 67-93. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
van Langenhove, L
R. Harre (l993) Positioning and autobiography: Telling your life. In N. Coupland & J. Nussbaum (eds.) Discourse and life-span development Vol. 4 . Newbury Park, CA Sage pp. 81 89
Webster's ninth new collegiate dictionary
(l983) Springfield, MA: A Meriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Wilson, J
(2001) Political discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 398-415.Google Scholar