Metalinguistic awareness

Elizabeth MertzJonathan Yovel

Table of contents

Theories of metalanguage have a long and venerable history in a number of traditions, from logic through cognitive science. However in recent years, an exciting new approach to the study of metalanguage – focused upon the issue of metalinguistic awareness – has emerged from empirical research on language pragmatics and metapragmatics. This work moves beyond an older conceptualization of metalanguage as language that talks about language, analyzing in depth how metalanguage also creates, structures, and forms language and ongoing speech. Speakers have varying degrees of awareness of metalanguage as it both refers to and performatively formulates communication. At times, participants explicitly recognize a metalinguistic level that structures their conversation. At other times the structuring role of metalanguage may be partially or completely concealed, operating in subtle ways of which speakers are partially or totally unaware. Even in these instances, speakers’ partial awareness – or even total misunderstanding – of metalanguage can help to shape linguistic interaction. Understandings and misunderstandings of the role of metalanguage may also be regularized in the form of socially-shared ‘linguistic ideologies’. In this paper we outline the implications of the new, empirically-informed approach to metalinguistic awareness, locating this scholarship in relation to work on metalanguage from a number of other traditions.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Amichai, Y.
1983The hour of grace. Schoken.Google Scholar
Austin, J.L.
1962How to do things with words. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M.
1981Discourse in the novel. In The dialogic imagination: 258–422. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1987Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Banfield, A.
1993Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet literary history: the development of represented speech and thought. In J. Lucy (ed.): 339–364.Google Scholar
Bateson, G.
1972Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine.Google Scholar
Bauman, R.
1983Let your words be few: symbolism of speaking and silence among seventeenth-centure Quakers. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. & C. Briggs
1990Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual review of anthropology 19: 59–88. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, E.
1974Problèmes de linguistique générale Vol. II. Gallimard.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D.
1989Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J.
1999Language ideological debates. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Braten, I.
1991Vygotsky as precursor to metacognitive theory: I. The concept of metacognition and its roots. Scandinavian journal of educational research 35(3): 179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, C.
1986Learning how to ask: a sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1993aMetadiscursive practices and scholarly authority in folkloristics. Journal of american folklore 106: 387–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993bGeneric versus metapragmatic dimensions of Warao narratives: who regiments performance? In J. Lucy (ed.): 179–212.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. & R. Bauman
1992Genre intertextuality, and social power. Journal of linguistic anthropology 2(2): 131–172. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.
1975aThe ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of child language 3: 1–19.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1975bFrom communication to language – a psychological perspective. Cognition 3: 255–287. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D.
1995Verbal hygiene. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1985Feminism and linguistic theory. Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camps, A. & M. Milian
(eds.) 2000Metalinguistic activity in learning to write. Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1972Stages in language development and reading. Harvard educational review 42: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, J.
1996Socialization to text: structure and contradiction in schooled literacy. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (eds.): 203–228.Google Scholar
1998Our ideologies and theirs. In B. Schieffelin et al. (eds.): 256–270.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.
1977Limited Inc. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A.
1997Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, T.
1991Ideology: an introduction. Verso.Google Scholar
Ehri, L.C.
1979Linguistic insight: threshold of reading acquisition. In T.G. Waller & G.E. Mackinnon (eds.) Reading research: advances in theory and Practice, Vol 1: 63–114. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J.H.
1981Cognitive monitoring. In W.P. Dickson (ed.) Children’s oral communication skills: 35–60. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J.H., J.R Speer, F.L. Green & D.L. August
1981The development of comprehension monitoring and knowledge about communication. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 46.Google Scholar
Francis, N.
1999Bilingualism, writing, and metalinguistic awareness: oral-literate interactions between first and second languages. Applied psycholinguistics 20: 533–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000The shared conceptual system and language processing in bilingual children: findings from literacy assessment in Spanish and Nahuatl. Applied linguistics 21: 170–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, S.
1993Diversity and contestation in linguistic ideologies: German speakers in Hungary. Language in society 22: 337–359. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. & J. Irvine
1995The boundaries of languages and disciplines: how ideologies construct difference. Social research 62: 967–1001.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L.R., H. Gleitman & E.P. Shipley
1972The emergence of the child as grammarian. Cognition 1: 137–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
1974Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1979Footing. Semiotica 25: 1–19. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gombert, J.E.
1992Metalinguistic development. Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A.
1971Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. International Publishers.Google Scholar
Greimas, A.J.
1990Narrative semiotics and cognitive discourse. Pinter.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1975Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics, Vol 3: Speech acts: 41–58. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.
1982Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. & D. Hymes
1972Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication. Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J.
1984The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hakes, D.
1980The development of metalinguistic abilities: what develops? In S.A. Kuczaj (ed.) Language acquisition: language, cognition and culture: 163–210. Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W.
1989Text and textuality. Annual review of anthropology 18: 95–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Metalanguage and pragmatics of deixis. In J. Lucy (ed.): 127–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, S.B.
1989Language Ideology. In International encyclopedia of communications 2: 393–395. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M.
1993The boundaries of reported speech in narrative discourse: some developmental aspects. In J. Lucy (ed.): 63–90.Google Scholar
Hill, J.
1985The grammar of consciousness and the consciousness of grammar. American ethnologist 12: 725–737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Junk Spanish, covert racism, and the (leaky) boundary between public and private spheres. Pragmatics 5: 197–212.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998“Today there is no respect”: nostalgia, “respect ,” and oppositional discourse in Mexicano (Nahuatl) language ideology. In B. Schieffelin et al. (eds.): 68–86.Google Scholar
Hirsch, S.
1998Pronouncing and persevering: gender and the discourses of disputing in an African Islamic court. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J.
1998Ideologies of honorific language. In B. Schieffelin (eds.): 51–67. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Janowitz, N.
1993Re-creating Genesis: the metapragmatics of divine speech. In J. Lucy (ed.): 393–405.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1957 [1971]Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Harvard University Russian Language Project.Google Scholar
1960Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language: 350–377. M.I.T. Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1963Essais de linguistique générale. Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. & T. Taylor
(eds.) 1990Ideologies of language. Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C.
1980L’énonciation: de la subjectivité dans le langage. Armand Colin.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kreutzer, M.A., C. Leonard & J.H. Flavell
1975An interview study of children’s knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40: 4 (Serial No. 112). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S.
1980Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, P.
1998Arizona Tewa Kiva speech as a manifestation of a dominant language. In B. Schieffelin et al. (eds.): 103–122.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, J.
1972The role of deictic elements in linguistic evolution. Semiotica 5: 174–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linsky, L.
1967Referring. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lucy, J.
1992aGrammatical categories and cognition: a case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1992bLanguage diversity and thought: a reformulation of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1993aReflexive language: reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1993bReflexive language and the human disciplines. In J. Lucy (ed.): 9–32.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markman, E.M.
1979Realizing what you don’t understand: elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies. Child development 50: 643–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, G.
1993Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
2001Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith trial. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mertz, E.
1985Introducing semiotic mediation. In E. Mertz & R. Parmentier (eds.): 1–19.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989Sociolinguistic creativity: Cape Breton Gaelic’s sociolinguistic tip. In N. Dorian (ed.) Investigating obsolescence: studies in language contraction and death: 103–116. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Learning what to ask: metapragmatic factors and methodological reification. In J. Lucy (ed.): 159–174.Google Scholar
1996Recontextualization as socialization: text and pragmatics in the law school classroom. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (eds.): 229–249.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1998a (with W. Njogu & S. Gooding) What difference does difference make? the challenge for legal education. Journal of legal education 48(1): 1–87.Google Scholar
1998bLinguistic constructions of difference and history in the U.S. law school classroom. In C. Greenhouse (ed.) Democracy and ethnography: constructions of identity in multicultural liberal states: 218–232. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
2000Teaching lawyers the language of law: legal and anthropological translations. John Marshall law review 34: 91–117.Google Scholar
Mertz, E. & R. Parmentier
1985Semiotic mediation: sociocultural and psychological perspectives. Academic.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mertz, E. & B. Weissbourd
1985Legal ideology and linguistic theory: variability and its limits. In E. Mertz & R. Parmentier (eds.): 261–285.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E.
1988Culture and language development. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Parmentier, R.
1993The political function of reported speech: A Belauan example. In J. Lucy (ed.): 261–286.Google Scholar
Philips, S.
1998aIdeology in the language of judges: how judges practice law politics, and courtroom control. Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1998bLanguage ideologies in institutions of power: a commentary. In B. Schieffelin et al. (eds.): 211–225.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
1980aThe psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.) Language and learning: the debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1980bAdaptation and intelligence: organic selection and phenocopy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, C. & R. Grieve
1984The development of metalinguistic awareness: an introduction. In W. Tunmer et al. (eds.): 2–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, W.V.O.
1960Word and object. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, E.B., G.W. Ledger & D.M. Robine
1984Effects of semantic integration training on the recall of pictograph sentences by children in kindergarten and first grade. Journal of educational psychology 76(3): 387–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sajavaara, K., R. Alanen, H. Dufva, K. Mäntylä, M. Pääkkönen & S. Saarela
1999Children’s metalinguistic awareness in L1 and L a sociolinguistic perspective. Multiple languages – multiple perspectives: Texts on language teaching and linguistic research. In P. Pietil & O.-P. Salo (eds.) Multiple languages – multiple perspectives: Texts on language teaching and linguistic research: 218–227. Jyväskylä: AFinLa.Google Scholar
Sapir, E.
1949The unconscious patterning of behavior in society. In D. Mandelbaum (ed.) Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality: 544–559. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, K.
1997Pretend play as improvisation: Conversation in the preschool classroom. L. Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B.
1990The give and take of everyday life: language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B., K. Woolard & P. Kroskrity
(eds.) 1998Language ideologies: practice and theory. Oxford.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C.E. & W. Weaver
1949The mathematical model of communication. University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M.
1976aHierarchy of features and ergativity. In R.M.W. Dixon (ed.) Grammatical categories in Australian languages: 112–171. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
1976bShifters linguistic categories and cultural description. In K. Basso & H. Selby (eds.) Meaning in anthropology: 11–55. University of New Mexico Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1979Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. Clyne, W. Hanks, & C. Hofbauer (eds.) The elements: a parasession on linguistic units and levels: 193–247. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1981aThe limits of awareness. Working papers in sociolinguistics No. 84. Southwest Educational Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
1981bMetaforces of power in traditional oratory. Lecture to Yale University Department of Anthropology.Google Scholar
1985aLanguage and the culture of gender: at the intersection of structure usage, and ideology. In E. Mertz & R. Parmentier (eds.): 219–259.Google Scholar
1985bThe culture of language in Chinookan texts; or, on saying that … in Chinook. In J. Nichols & A.C. Woodbury (eds.) Grammar inside and outside the clause: 132–171. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1985cThe functional stratification of language and ontogenesis. In J. Wertsch (ed.) Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives: 205–235. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1987The three faces of function: preliminaries to a psychology of language. In M. Hickmann, Social and functional approaches to language and thought: 17–38. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1993Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (ed.): 33–58. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996The secret life of texts. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (eds.): 81–105.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1998The uses and utility of ideology: a commentary. In B. Schieffelin (eds.): 123–145. Oxford. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. & G. Urban
1996Natural histories of discourse. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tarski, A.
1956Logic semantics, metamathematics. Clarendon.Google Scholar
1956The semantic conception of truth. Philosophy and phenomenological research 4: 341–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W.E. & M.L. Herriman
1984The development of metalinguistic awareness: a conceptual overview. In W.E. Tunmer et al. (eds.): 12–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W.E. & M.E. Myhill
1984Metalinguistic awareness and bilingualism. In W.E. Tunmer et al. (eds.): 169–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W.E., C. Pratt & M.L. Herriman
1984Metalinguistic awareness in children: theory research and implications. Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, J.
2000Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics 10(4): 439–456.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Linguistic pragmatics and semiotics. Semiotica 104: 45–65. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, P.A. & J.G. De Villiers
1972Early judgments of semantic and syntactic acceptability by children. Journal of psycholinguistic research 1: 299–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J.G. & P.A. De Villiers
1999Language development. In M. Bornstein & M. Lamb (eds.) Developmental psychology: an advanced textbook (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S.
1986Thought and language. M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
1978Mind in society: the development of higher psychological process. Harv. University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1997Pensée et language. ed. La dispute.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J.
1985Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Whorf, B.L.
1956Language thought, and reality. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1922Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Woolard, K.
1989Sentences in the language prison: the rhetorical structuring of an American language policy debate. American ethnologist 16: 268–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. Schieffelin (eds.): 3–47.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. & B. Schieffelin
1994Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23: 55–82. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Yovel, J.
2000What is contract law “about”? Speech act theory and a critique of “skeletal promises”. Northwestern University law review 94: 937–962.Google Scholar
2001aInvisible Precedents: On the Many Lives of Legal Stories Through Law and Popular Culture. Emory law journal 50: 1266–94.Google Scholar
2001bTwo conceptions of relevance. Cybernetics and Systems 2003, in press.Google Scholar