Médiation interculturelle
Traduction par Gabrielle Sylvestre
Table des matières
La médiation interculturelle est une forme d’intervention traductionnelle qui prend en considération l’impact que peut avoir la distance culturelle lors de l’acte traductif ou interprétatif. Son but est d’améliorer l’accessibilité d’un texte en usant de compétences telles que la « réécriture » (voir Approche culturelle), la « recréation » ou la « transcréation ». Elle a deux fonctions principales. La première est d’assurer une communication efficace entre les cultures, en remédiant aux possibles malentendus (perte ou altération de sens) par l’intervention d’un intermédiaire, dans ce cas-ci le traducteur/interprète ; et la deuxième est de venir en aide aux groupes culturels vulnérables en assurant que leurs voix soient entendues et que leurs différences et leurs droits soient respectés.
Références
Bassnett, Susan
Beaugrande, Robert-Alain & Dressler, Wolfgang Ulrich
1981 Introduction to Text Linguistics. -London: Longman.
Hatim, Basil & Mason, Ian
Inghilleri, Moira
2005 “Mediating zones of uncertainty. Interpreter agency, the interpreting habitus and political asylum adjudication.” The Translator 11 (1): 69–85. 
TSB
TSBKatan, David
2002 “Mediating the point of refraction and playing with the perlocutionary effect: A translator’s choice?” In Critical Studies: Vol 20, Cultural Studies, Interdisciplinarity and Translation, Stefan Herbrechter (ed.), 177–195. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. TSB
2009 « Translation as intercultural communication. » In The Routledge Companion to Translation Studies, Jeremy Munday (ed.), 74–92. Oxford: Routledge. TSB
2011a « Interpreting as intervention: Norms, beliefs and strategies. » In Interpretazione e mediazione: Un’opposizione inconciliabile?, Jose F. Medina Montero & Sarah Tripepi Winteringham (eds), 33–66. Rome: ARACNE editrice.
2011b « Occupation or profession : A survey of the translators’ world. » In Profession, Identity and Status: Translators and Interpreters as an Occupational Group, Rakefet Sela-Sheffy & Miriam Shlesinger (eds), 187–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. TSB
TSBKelly, Dorothy
Leanza Yvan
2007 “Roles of community interpreters in pediatrics as seen by interpreters, physicians and researchers.” In Healthcare Interpreting: Discourse and Interaction, Franz Pöchhacker & Miriam Shlesinger (eds), 11–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. BoP
BoPMartín, Mayte C. & Phelan, Mary
2010 “Interpreters and cultural mediators – Different but complementary roles.” Translocations: Migration and Social Change 6 (1). http://www.translocations.ie/docs/v06i01/Martin%20and%20Phelan.pdf. [Accessed on 15 July 2013].
Mesa, Anne-Marie
2000 « The cultural interpreter: An appreciated professional. Results of a study on interpreting services: Client, health care work and interpreters point of view. » In The Critical Link 2: Interpreters in the Community. Roda P. Roberts, Silvana E. Carr, Diana Abraham & Aideen Dufour (eds), 67–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins TSB
Metzger, Melanie
1999 Sign Language Interpreting: Deconstructing the Myth of Neutrality. -Washington (DC): Gallaudet University Press. TSB
Mikkelson, Holly
2008 “Evolving views of the court interpreter’s role: Between Scylla and Charybdis.” In Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting: Definitions and Dilemmas, Carmen Valero-Garcés & Anne Martin (eds), 81–97. Amsterdam: John Benjamins BoP.
National Standard Guide for Community Interpreting Services
2007 Toronto: Healthcare Interpretation Network. www.ailia.ca/tiki-download_file.php?fileId=34. [Accessed on 29 July 2013].
NCIHC
2005 National Standards of Practice for Interpreters in Healthcare. http://www.mchb.hrsa.gov/training/documents/pdf_library/National_Standards_of_Practice_for_Interpreters_in_Health_Care%20(12-05).pdf [Accessed on 15 July 2013].
Pym, Anthony
2013 “Translation Studies in Europe – Reasons for it, and problems to work on.” http://usuaris.tinet.cat/apym/on-line/research_methods/2013_TS_Europe.pdf [Accessed 11 July 2013]. TSB
TSB
2006 “Localization, training, and the threat of fragmentation.” http://usuaris.tinet.cat/apym/on-line/translation/Localization_monterey.doc [Accessed 16 July 2013].
2002 “Localization and the training of linguistic mediators for the third millennium.” http://usuaris.tinet.cat/apym/on-line/translation/beirut.pdf [Accessed on July 16 2013]. TSB
Roberts, Simon
1994 “Law and dispute processes.” In Companion Encyclopaedia of Anthropology, Tim Ingold (ed.), 962–982. London: Routledge.
Taft, Ronald
1981 “The Role and Personality of the Mediator.” In The Mediating Person: Bridges between Cultures, Stephen Bochner (ed.), 53–88. Cambridge: Schenkman.
Tymoczko, Maria
Wadensjö, Cecilia
Lectures recommandées
Davies, Eirlys E.
2012 “Translation and intercultural communication: Bridges and barriers.” In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication, Christina Bratt Paulston, Scott F. Kiesling & Elizabeth S. Rangel (eds), 367–388. Oxford: Wiley and Blackwell.
Katan, David
2004 [2nd edition]. Translating Cultures: An Introduction for Translators, Interpreters and Mediators. Manchester: St. Jerome. BoP
2009 “Translator training and intercultural competence”. In La ricerca nella comunicazione interlinguistica. Modelli teorici e metodologici. Stefania Cavagnoli, Elena Di Giovanni & Raffaela Merlini (eds), 282–301. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Merlini, Rafaella
2009 « Seeking asylum and seeking identity in a mediated encounter. The projection of selves through discursive practices. » Interpreting 11 (1): 57–93.
Pöchhacker, Franz
2008 “Interpreting as mediation.” In Crossing Borders in Community Interpreting. Definitions and Dilemmas, Carmen Valero-Garcés & Anne Martin (eds), 9–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins BoP.
Ulrych, Margherita
2009 “Translation and editing as mediated discourse: focus on the recipient.” In Translators and Their Readers. In Homage to Eugene A. Nida, Rodica Dimitriu & Miriam Shlesinger (eds), 219–234. Brussels: Les Editions du Hazard.