References (75)
References
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Teaching ‘casual’ and/or ‘impolite’ language through multimedia: The case of non-honorific panmal speech styles in Korean. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015a). Honorifics and politeness. In L. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp. 303–319). Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015b). Revisiting “polite” –yo and “deferential” –supnita speech style shifting in Korean from the viewpoint of indexicality. Journal of Pragmatics, 791, 43–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, L., & Yeon, J. (2015). Varieties of contemporary Korean. In L. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp. 459–476). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byon, A. S. (2004). Sociopragmatic analysis of Korean requests: Pedagogical settings. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(9), 1673–1704. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 2(2), 247–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Second language acquisition: Pragmatics. In L. Brown & J. Yeon (Eds.), The handbook of Korean linguistics (pp. 389–404). Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, C. (1980). Pragmatics and rules of politeness. Language Research, 16(1), 1–11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Kongsonuy coken [Conditions on politeness] Yengeyengmwunhak, 32(2), 297–316.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, T. (2011). Gender inequality of address terms and honorific usages in the conjugal relations. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 19(1), 159–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Choi, H. K. (2002). A study of politeness in Korean requests. Teaching Korean as a Foreign Language, 271, 271–299.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1997). Developing pragmatic ability: Insights from the accelerated study of Japanese. In H. M. Cook, K. Hijirida, & M. Tahara (Eds.), New trends and issues in teaching Japanese language and culture (pp. 133–160). University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eun, J. O., & Strauss, S. (2004). The primacy of information status in the alternation between deferential and polite forms in Korean public discourse. Language Sciences, 26(3), 251–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Europarat (Ed.). (2010). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (10th print). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2018). Role plays. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 305–332). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goddard, C. (2009). Not taking yourself too seriously in Australian English: Semantic explications, cultural scripts, corpus evidence. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(1) 29–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatfield, H., & Hahn, J.-W. (2011). What Korean apologies require of politeness theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(5), 1303–1317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. (2010). Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research, 26(3), 355–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hijirida, K., & Sohn, H. (1986). Cross-cultural patterns of honorifics and sociolinguistic sensitivity to honorific variables: Evidence from English, Japanese, and Korean. Papers in Linguistics, 19(3), 365–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinkel, E. (2001). Building awareness and practical skills for cross-cultural communication in ESL/EFL. In M. Celce-Murica (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 442–458). Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1990). Apologies in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 19(2), 155–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hur, S. (2010). Hankwuke kongsonphyohyenuy hwayongloncek yenkwu [A pragmatic study on expression of politeness in Korean]. Pusan National University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. (2019). Understanding English language learners’ pragmatic resistance. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 1–21). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2022). Adapting textbooks for teaching pragmatics. In N. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen, Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (2nd ed., pp. 149–174). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishihara, N., & Tarone, E. (2009). Subjectivity and pragmatic choice in L2 Japanese: Emulating and resisting pragmatic norms. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), Pragmatic competence (pp. 101–128). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeon, E. (2020). A study on impolite expressions in refusal speech acts from Korean learners. Journal of Korean Language Education, 31(3), 273–308.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeon, J. (2007). The aspect of politeness strategy in the request speech act. Korean Language Research, 211, 247–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeong, W., & Lee, N. (2022). Understanding of Korean honorifics by L2 Korean learners in Australia: A socio-pragmatic perspective. Language Research, 58(3), 223–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskés, I. (2014). Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiaer, J., Choi, N., Driggs, D., & Park, M.-J. (2019). The roles of age, gender and setting in Korean half-talk shift. Discourse and Cognition, 26(3), 279–308.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, A. H. (2011). Politeness in Korea. In D. Z. Kadar & S. Mills (Eds.), Politeness in East Asia (pp. 176–207). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, H. (2008). The semantic and pragmatic analysis of South Korean and Australian English apologetic speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(2), 257–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, S. (2013). The realizations of politeness in Korean speech acts. Korean Linguistics, 611, 123–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2012). Noun classes and subject honorification in Korean. Linguistic Research, 29(3), 563–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ko, Y., & Nam, K. (1985). Standard Korean grammar [Phyocwunkwukemwunpep]. Thapchwulphansa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koo, H. J. (2004). A study on aspects of politeness strategy. Discourse and Cognition, 11(3), 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwon, N., & Shin, G.-H. (2025). Overgeneralization of Korean subject honorification by English-speaking learners of Korean. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lan, N. T. N., & Kim, K. (2022). A comparative analysis study on the use of Korean refusal speech acts strategies by Korean native speakers and Vietnamese Korean learners. Journal of the International Network for Korean Language and Culture, 19(3), 261–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, H. (2022). Suggestions for politeness theory based on Korean social culture. Korean Semantics, 781, 383–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, I., & Ramsey, S. R. (2000). The Korean language. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2006). On the studies of Korean honorifics from the sociolinguistic standpoint. Journal of Korea Linguistics, 471, 407–448.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, M., Huh, S., & O’Grady, W. (2017). Korean subject honorifics: An experimental study. Journal of Pragmatics, 1171, 58–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, N. (2022). The pragmatic understanding of subject expression in spoken Korean: Interpersonal effects of the alternation among reference forms for the expressed subject. East Asian Pragmatics, 7(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). Korean speaker’s perception of (im)politeness across speech acts of agreement, compliment, disagreement and criticism. Linguistic Research, 411(Special Edition), 185–207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LoCastro, V. (2001). Individual differences in second language acquisition: Attitudes, learner subjectivity, and L2 pragmatic norms. System, 29(1), 69–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mao, T., & He, S. (2021). An integrated approach to pragmatic competence: Its framework and properties. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211011472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, S. (2017). A study on the issue of Korean politeness research -focusing on literature reviews-. The Language and Culture, 13(4), 59–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, S. Y. (2022). A theoretical inquiry into the possibility and direction of intercultural politeness research -focusing on the limitations of B&L(1987)’s politeness theory-. The Language and Culture, 18(3), 61–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Purpura, J. E. (2004). Assessing grammar (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2004). The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurring English. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3), 291–330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, K. R. (1999). Teachers and students learning about requests in Hong Kong. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 167–180). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, M. (2017). An exploratory study on politeness strategies in requests by Korean learners of English and American English speakers. Hawaii Pacific University TESOL Working Papers, 151, 78–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegal, M. (1995). Individual differences and study abroad: Women learning Japanese in Japan. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Studies in bilingualism (Vol. 91, pp. 225–244). John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sohn, H. (1981). Power and solidarity in the Korean language. Papers in Linguistics, 14(3), 431–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). The Korean language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). The Korean language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strauss, S., & Eun, J. O. (2005). Indexicality and honorific speech level choice in Korean. Linguistics, 43(3), 611–651. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice & poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeon, J., & Brown, L. (2019). Korean: A comprehensive grammar (2nd ed.). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, K.-J. (2004). Not just words: Korean social models and the use of honorifics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue