Cover not available

Article In: Diachronica: Online-First Articles

Sequential structure and diachronic assimilation in signed languages

ORCiD logo with link | University of Texas at Austin
ORCiD logo with link | University of Texas at Austin
ORCiD logo with link | University of Texas at Austin
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Assimilatory processes are generally understood to rely on sequential structure: a target element adopts features of a preceding or following element. While signed languages arguably show less sequential structure than spoken languages, there are several areas of the grammar of signed languages where sequential structure is evident and the conditions for assimilatory processes are available. Previous work has explored coarticulatory effects in sign production and has identified assimilation in contexts of multimorphemic compounds. This paper extends the investigation of diachronic assimilation to sign-internal assimilation within monomorphemic signs. We present case studies of diachronic assimilation using historical documentation of American Sign Language as well as comparative data from across the so-called French sign language family. We argue that although opportunities for sequentially structured assimilation in signed languages may be significantly fewer than in spoken languages, nevertheless many of the same kinds of assimilatory processes can be seen in diachronic changes to signs.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background on sign phonology
    • 2.1Sequential structure in models of sign phonology
    • 2.2Coarticulation and assimilation across sequences
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Sequentially-driven assimilation in monomorphemic signs
    • 3.2Cross-linguistic evidence of diachronic assimilation
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
References (56)
References
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler. 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81(2). 301–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical borrowing in ASL. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Carol A. Padden. 2001. Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 87–120. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheek, Davina A. 2001. The phonetics and phonology of handshape in American sign language. University of Texas Austin PhD dissertation.
Crasborn, Onno, Richard Bank, Inge Zwitserlood, Els van der Kooij, Ellen Ormel, Johan Ros, Anique Schüller, Anne de Meijer, Merel van Zuilen, Yassine Ellen Nauta, Frouke van Winsum, & Max Vonk. 2020. NGT dataset in Global Signbank. Nijmegen: Radboud University, Centre for Language Studies. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionnaire de LSFB en ligne. 2017. [URL]
Frishberg, Nancy. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 511. 696–719. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.
Higgins, D. D. 1923. How to talk to the deaf. St. Louis, MO: D. D. Higgins, C. SS. R.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hochgesang, Julie A., Onno Crasborn & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2024. ASL Signbank. New Haven, CT: Haskins Lab, Yale University. [URL]
Hyman, Larry M. 1976. Phonologization. In Alphonse Juilland (ed.), Linguistic studies presented to Joseph H. Greenberg, 407–418. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Robert, & Scott. K. Liddell. 2011a. Toward a phonetic representation of signs: Sequentiality and contrast. Sign Language Studies 11(2). 241–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. A segmental framework for representing signs phonetically. Sign Language Studies 11(3): 408–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keane, J., Diane Brentari & J. Riggle. 2013. Coarticulation in ASL fingerspelling. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 421. 261–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köhler, Reinhard. 1986. Zur linguistischen Synergetik: Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1981. Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy. Language 571. 267–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors, vol. 11. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of linguistic change: Social factors, vol. 21. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambert, abbé Louis Marie. 1865. Le langage de la physionomie et du geste mis à la portée de tous. Paris: Jacques Lecoffre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1984. THINK and BELIEVE: Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 601. 372–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson. 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 641. 195–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, J. Schuyler. 1918. The sign language: A manual of signs, 2nd ed. Des Moines, IA: Robert Henderson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark A. 1981. Phonotactics and morphology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley PhD dissertation.
Mauk, Claude. E. 2003. Undershoot in two modalities: Evidence from fast speech and fast signing. University of Texas, Austin PhD dissertation.
McCarthy, John J. & Norval Smith. 2003. Phonological processes: Assimilation. Oxford international encyclopedia of linguistics, 320–323. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 2002. Why different, why the same? Explaining effects and non-effects of modality upon linguistic structure in sign and speech. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsey Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaels, J. W. 1923. A handbook of the sign language of the deaf. Atlanta, GA: Foote & Davies Co., Printers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Christopher. 2001. The adaptation of loan words in Quebec Sign Language: Multiple sources, multiple processes. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 139–173. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Occhino, Corrine. 2016. A cognitive approach to phonology: Evidence from signed languages. University of New Mexico PhD dissertation.
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrick, & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Parasession on language and behavior, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohala, John. J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ormel, Ellen, Crasborn, Onno. and van der Kooij, Els. 2013. Coarticulation of hand height in Sign Language of the Netherlands is affected by contact type. Journal of Phonetics 41(3–4). 156–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ormel, Ellen, Onno Crasborn, Gerrit Jan Koostra, Anne de Meijer. 2017. Coarticulation of hHandshape in Sign Language of the Netherlands: A cCorpus sStudy. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 8(1).: 10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavlík, Radoslav. 2009. A typology of assimilations. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 6(1). 2–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelissier, Pierre. 1856. L’enseignement primaire des sourds-muets mis à la portée de tout le monde, avec une iconographie des signes. Paris: Paul Dupont.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Port, R. F., & Leary, A. P. (2005). Against Formal Phonology. Language 81(4). 927–964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Power, Justin M., David Quinto-Pozos, & Danny Law. 2022. Signed language transcription and the creation of a cross-linguistic comparative database. In Eleni Efthimiou et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages, 173–180. Marseilles, France: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Power, Justin M. & Richard P. Meier. 2023. Demographics in the formation of language communities and in the emergence of languages: The early years of ASL in New England. Language 991. 275–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, K., Wilkinson, E. and Janzen, T. 2010. ASL sign lowering as target undershoot: A corpus study. Laboratory Phonology 2(2). 403–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 501. 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. A sonority cycle in American Sign Language. Phonology 101. 243–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Prosody and syntax in sign languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(3). 298–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova, Naomi K. Caselli, Ariel M. Cohen-Goldberg, & Karen Emmorey. 2021. The ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A database of lexical and phonological properties for 2,723 signs in American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 26(2). 263–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C. 1960/2005. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(1). 3–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C., Dorothy C. Casterline & Carl G. Croneberg. 1965. Dictionary: American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude E. Mauk. 2010. Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 381. 317–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, Harry. 1993. Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 101. 209–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, Harry & Els van der Kooij. 2021. Sign language phonology: Theoretical perspectives. In Josep Quer, Roland Pfau & Annika Herrmann (eds.), The Routledge handbook of theoretical and experimental sign language research, 1–32. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Kooij, Els. 2002. Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Phonetic implementation and iconicity. Leiden: Leiden University PhD dissertation.
Vlaams Gebarentaal Centrum. 2024. Woordenboek Vlaamse Gebarentaal. [URL]
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfried P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 95–188. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2021. Toward an individual-difference perspective on phonologization. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue