In:Principles of New Science: Dialogue in the stream of life
Edda Weigand
[Dialogue Studies 35] 2026
► pp. xiii–xiii
Acknowledgements
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
I am grateful to all the scholars and friends who discussed questions of
science and dialogue with me in nearly all periods of my academic life. I would like
to mention especially Franz Hundsnurscher (Münster), my teacher and life-long
friend, who introduced me to the field of action, decades ago. He succeeded in
convincing me to leave modern linguistics of structuralism and generative grammar
restricted to ‘language’ and focus on the ‘use of language’ in dialogic action.
Franz and I liked to discuss our views on dialogue as action not only in
the period when we agreed on a rule-governed concept but also when I changed my view
from competence to competence-in-performance. Together with Sorin
Stati (Bologna), we were united in the idea of language-as-dialogue which led us to
found IADA, the International Association of Dialogue Analysis. Addressing dialogue
from the point of view of performance even led me to cross the boundary of the
humanities and to envision the concept of New Science which unites natural and human
sciences.
I am also grateful to many others I was lucky to meet on various
occasions, during the IADA conferences but also outside in discussions with scholars
of pragmatics, to mention in particular Istvan Kecskes (Albany). Both of us share
some basic ideas, mainly that the key to the otherwise unstructured field of
language use is dialogue. I also remember František Daneš (Prague) and his
open-minded attitude in various linguistic issues, and Gabriella Valera (Trieste)
who was standing up for the right to dialogue. I would also like to thank the young
scientists who contacted me from all over the world. Their refreshing ideas confirm
that the time of closed patterns has passed.
Other scholars I am much indebted to are natural scientists.
Unfortunately I never met them personally, but their ideas confirm what I have
arrived at by general reasoning. I am only mentioning Edward O. Wilson, Ilya
Prigogine, Paul Nurse and Richard P. Feynman. Consilience seems possible although
the way to achieve it is tricky and demands effort and commitment.
I am also thankful to Mike Pincombe (Erlangen) who as native speaker
refined my English phrasing. Moreover, I am grateful to Răzvan Săftoiu who over
years helped me in editorial questions. I would also like to extend a cordial thank
you to Isja Conen and the John Benjamins Publishing Company for useful advice in the
production process. Last but not least, I would like to thank Luigi for his
stimulating remarks on central issues.
