In:Bridging Boundaries: Interdisciplinary perspectives on Hispanic Linguistics
Edited by Gregory L. Thompson and Scott M. Alvord
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 46] 2026
► pp. 224–249
Chapter 9How long does it take to name a picture?
The effects of extralinguistic variables on lexical retrieval among Spanish heritage speakers
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This chapter investigates the relationship
between several extralinguistic dimensions of the bilingual profile
and lexical retrieval. Specifically, we tested the accuracy and
timing of heritage Spanish-English speakers’ picture-naming
abilities using a standardized assessment called the Multilingual
Naming Task (MINT; Gollan
et al., 2012). Participants provided information about
their linguistic history and experiences through the Bilingual
Language Profile (BLP; Birdsong
et al., 2012), which quantifies language dominance,
self-rated proficiency, language usage, and attitudes. Through a
series of generalized mixed effects models (GLMM), these variables
were examined as predictors in the speed of retrieval.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Why lexical retrieval?
- 2.2Conflicting hypotheses
- 2.3Extralinguistic dimensions of the bilingual profile
- 2.3.1Age of acquisition
- 2.3.2Dominance and its subcomponents
- 3.Research questions and hypotheses
- 4.Method
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Materials and procedures
- 4.2.1Lexical retrieval task
- 4.2.2Extralinguistic factors
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Differences between monolingually raised and bilingual HSs
- 6.2Extralinguistic factors in lexical retrieval
- 7.Limitations and future directions
- 8.Conclusion
Note References
References (30)
Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. (2007). Bilingual
language production: The neurocognition of language
representation and
control. Journal of
Neurolinguistics, 20(3), 242–275.
Armon-Lotem, S., Rose, K., & Altman, C. (2020). The
development of English as a heritage language: The role of
chronological age and age of onset of
bilingualism. First
Language, 41(1), 67–89.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive
control and lexical access in younger and older
bilinguals. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 34(4), 859–873.
Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012, January 20). Bilingual
language profile: An easy-to-use instrument to assess
bilingualism. The Center for Open Educational Resources and Language Learning. [URL]
Gade, M., Declerck, M., Philipp, A. M., Rey-Mermet, A., & Koch, I. (2021). Assessing
the evidence for asymmetrical switch costs and reversed
language dominance effects: A
meta-analysis. Journal of
Cognition, 4(1), 55.
Garcia, D. L., & Gollan, T. H. (2022). The
MINT sprint: Exploring a fast administration procedure with
an expanded multilingual naming
test. Journal of the
International Neuropsychological
Society, 28(8), 845–861.
Goldrick, M., & Gollan, T. H. (2023). Inhibitory
control of the dominant language: Reversed language
dominance is the tip of the
iceberg. Journal of Memory
and
Language, 130.
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More
use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging,
bilingualism, and the weaker links
hypothesis. Journal of Memory
and
Language, 58(3), 787–814.
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., & Morris, S. K. (2005). Bilingualism
affects picture naming but not picture
classification. Memory &
Cognition, 33(7), 1220–1234.
Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency
drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The
frequency-lag
hypothesis. Journal of
Experimental Psychology:
General, 140(2), 186–209.
Gollan, T. H., Weissberger, G. H., Runnqvist, E., Montoya, R. I., & Cera, C. M. (2012). Self-ratings
of spoken language dominance: A multilingual naming test
(MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging
Spanish–English
bilinguals. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 15(3), 594–615.
Gonzalez, G. (2011). Spanish
heritage language maintenance: The relationship between
language use, linguistic insecurity, and social
networks [Doctoral
dissertation, University of Arizona].
Kim, K., & Kim, H. (2022). Sequential
bilingual heritage children’s L1 attrition in lexical
retrieval: Age of acquisition versus language
experience. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 25(4), 537–547.
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language
selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments
against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual
speech. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 9(2), 119–135.
Kroll, J. F., & Gollan, T. H. (2014). Speech
planning in two languages: What bilinguals tell us about
language
production. In M. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of language
production (pp. 165–181). Oxford University Press.
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2018). Terminology
matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early
child bilinguals are heritage
speakers. International
Journal of
Bilingualism, 22(5), 564–582.
Li, C., Goldrick, M., & Gollan, T. H. (2017). Bilinguals’
twisted tongues: Frequency lag or
interference? Memory &
Cognition, 45, 600–610.
Li, C., & Gollan, T. H. (2022). Language-switch
costs from comprehension to production might just be
task-switch
costs. Bilingualism: Language
and
Cognition, 25(3), 459–470.
López Otero, J. C., Hur, E., & Goldin, M. (2023). Syntactic
optionality in heritage Spanish: How patterns of exposure
and use affect clitic
climbing. International
Journal of
Bilingualism, 28(3), 531–554.
Marshall, M. T. (2024). Social
networks, speaker investment and oral proficiency of young
adult heritage and classroom language learners of
Spanish [Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation]. University of Illinois Chicago.
Martínez Vera, G., López Otero, J. C., Sokolova, M. Y., Cleveland, A., Marshall, M. T., & Sánchez, L. (2023). Aspectual
se and telicity in heritage Spanish
bilinguals: The effects of lexical access, dominance, age of
acquisition, and patterns of language
use. Languages, 8(3), 201.
Matos, J., & Flores, C. (2022). More
insights into the interaction between age, exposure, and
attitudes in language attrition and retention from the
perspective of bilingual
returnees. International
Journal of
Bilingualism, 28(1), 24–42.
Montrul, S. (2023). Heritage
languages: Language acquired, language lost, language
regained. Annual Review of
Linguistics, 9, 399–418.
Moritz-Gasser, S., & Herbet, G. (2021). Lexical
retrieval. In E. Mandonnet & G. Herbet (Eds.), Intraoperative
mapping of cognitive
networks (pp. 79–93). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. [URL].
O’Grady, W., Schafer, A. J., Perla, J., Lee, O-S., & Wieting, J. (2009). A
psycholinguistic tool for the assessment of language loss:
The HALA project. Language
Documentation and
Conservation 3(1), 100–112.
Olson, D. J. (2023). Measuring
bilingual language dominance: An examination of the
reliability of the Bilingual Language
Profile. Language
Testing, 40(3), 521–547.
Putnam, M. T., & Sánchez, L. (2013). What’s
so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegomenon
to modeling heritage language
grammars. Linguistic
Approaches to
Bilingualism, 3(4), 478–508.
Sandoval, T. C., Gollan, T. H., Ferreira, V. S., & Salmon, D. P. (2010). What
causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency? The
dual-task
analogy. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 13(2), 231–252.
Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., Secord, W. A. (n.d.). Clinical
evaluation of language fundamentals — Preschool
2. Harcourt/Psych Co. [URL]
