In:Bridging Boundaries: Interdisciplinary perspectives on Hispanic Linguistics
Edited by Gregory L. Thompson and Scott M. Alvord
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 46] 2026
► pp. 306–332
Chapter 12Allophonic splits of L1 phones in non-phonologically conditioned
variation
On the perception and production of the English /t͡ʃ/-/ʃ/ contrast by L1 Costa Rican and Panamanian Spanish speakers
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study investigates the discrimination and
production patterns of native Spanish speaking learners of English
in acquiring a novel contrast, /t͡ʃ/-/ʃ/. While many Spanish
dialects produce /t͡ʃ/ with the single allophone [t͡ʃ], some
dialects produce [t͡ʃ] and [ʃ] in non-phonologically conditioned
variation for /t͡ʃ/, which may lead to increased difficulty in
acquiring the contrast. We investigated the effect of this variation
in both perception and production of English /t͡ʃ/-/ʃ/. Higher rates
of variation in the native language led to decreased discrimination
and production accuracy in the second language (L2) for /t͡ʃ/;
however, L2 /ʃ/ productions were highly accurate. These findings
suggest that severing the perceptual association of phones in
variation for the same category is a more difficult task than
creating a new category.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Second language speech perception models
- 1.2Differences in allophonic relationships
- 1.3Description of Spanish /t͡ʃ/ and English /t͡ʃ/ and /ʃ/
- 1.4Studies investigating allophones
in non-phonologically conditioned variation - 1.5Current study and predictions
- 1.6Research questions and hypotheses
- 2.Method
- 2.1Stimuli
- 2.2Participants
- 2.3Procedure
- 2.3.1Spanish production task
- 2.3.2English proficiency task
- 2.3.3AXB discrimination task
- 2.3.4English production task
- 2.4Production task analysis
- 3.Results
- 3.1LexTALE analysis
- 3.2Spanish production task analysis
- 3.3AXB discrimination task analysis
- 3.4English production task analysis
- 4.Discussion
- 4.1Acquisition of L2 contrasts and the NEW scenario
- 4.2Production–perception link and L1 allophone generalization to the L2
- 4.3L2 Proficiency and accuracy in discrimination and production
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (33)
Balas, A. (2018). English
vowel perception by Polish advanced learners of
English. Canadian Journal of
Linguistics/Revue Canadienne De
Linguistique, 63(3), 309–338.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fitting
Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using
lme4. Journal of Statistical
Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Best, C. T. (1995). A
direct realist perspective on cross-language speech
perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech
perception and linguistic experience: Issues in
cross-language
research (pp. 171–204). York Press.
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative
and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and
complementarities. In M. J. Munro & O. -S. Bohn (Eds.), Language
experience in second language speech learning: In honor of
James Emil
Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat:
Doing phonetics by computer (Version
6.2.112) [Computer
software]. [URL]
Cardona Ramírez, M. A. (2010). Fonética
del español de
Panamá. In M. Á. Quesada Pacheco (Ed.), El
español hablado en América Central: Nivel
fonético (pp. 177–209). Iberoamericana Vervuert.
Chappell, W. (2016). On
the social perception of intervocalic /s/ voicing in Costa
Rican Spanish. Language
Variation and
Change, 28(03), 357–378.
Chappell, W., & García, C. (2017). Variable
production and indexical social meaning: On the potential
physiological origin of intervocalic /s/ voicing in Costa
Rican Spanish. Studies in
Hispanic and Lusophone
Linguistics, 10(1), 1–37.
Eckman, F., & Iverson, G. K. (2013). The
role of native language phonology in the production of L2
contrasts. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 35(1), 67–92.
Eckman, F. R., Elreyes, A., & Iverson, G. K. (2003). Some
principles of second language
phonology. Second Language
Research, 19(3), 169–208.
Elvin, J., & Escudero, P. (2019). Cross-linguistic
influence in second language speech: Implications for
learning and
teaching. In M. Gutierrez-Mangado, M. Martínez-Adrián, & F. Gallardo-del-Puerto (Eds.), Cross-linguistic
influence: From empirical evidence to classroom
practice (pp. 1–20). Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer.
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic
perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the
attainment of optimal phonological
categorization [PhD
dissertation, Utrecht University]. LOT
Dissertation Series 113.
Fabra, L. R., & Tyler, M. D. (2023). Predicting
discrimination difficulty of Californian English vowel
contrasts from L2-to-L1
categorization. Ampersand, 10, 1–9.
Flege, J., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The
Revised Speech Learning Model
(SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second
language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical
progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press.
González-Johnson, A. M., & Cisneros, R. W. (2022). Dominant
Panamanian Spanish dialectal allophone in free variation in
the pronunciation of the English voiceless post-alveolar
sounds. Revista Científica
Especializada en Educación y
Ambiente, 1(1), 60–84.
Herd, W., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2010). An
acoustic and perceptual analysis of /t/ and /d/ flaps in
American English. Journal of
Phonetics, 38(4), 504–516.
Hutchinson, A. E., & Dmitrieva, O. (2021). Individual
variation in acquisition of voicing contrasts by classroom
learners of French. Journal
of Second Language
Pronunciation, 7(3), 1–27.
Kilpatrick, A. J., Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., & Baker, B. J. (2019). Japanese
co-occurrence restrictions influence second language
perception. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 40(2), 585–611.
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2011). Introducing
LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced
learners of English. Behavior
Research
Methods, 44, 325–343.
Llompart, M., Eger, N. A., & Reinisch, E. (2021). Free
allophonic variation in native and second language spoken
word recognition: The case of the German
rhotic. Frontiers in
Psychology, 12, 1–12.
López Velarde, M., & Simonet, M. (2020). The
perception of postalveolar English obstruents by Spanish
speakers learning English as a foreign language in
Mexico. Languages, 5(27), 1–19.
Méndez, L. (2017). The
variant [ʃ] in the Spanish of Ciudad
Juárez. Borealis — An
International Journal of Hispanic
Linguistics, 6(1), 243–260.
Peperkamp, S., Pettinato, M., & Dupoux, E. (2003). Allophonic
variation and the acquisition of phoneme
categories. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Ed.), Proceedings
of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language
Development (Vol. 2, pp. 650–661). Vol. 2. Cascadilla Press.
Quesada Pacheco, M. Á., & Vargas, L. V. (2010). Rasgos
fonéticos del español de Costa
Rica. In M. Á. Quesada Pacheco, El
español hablado en América Central: Nivel
fonético (pp. 155–175). Iberoamericana Vervuert.
R Core
Team. (2021). R:
A language and environment for statistical
computing (Version
4.1.2) [Computer
Software]. [URL]
Radu, M. (2020). The
L2 production of Spanish taps and trills by L1 Romanian and
L1 French speakers (Order No.
27666693) [Doctoral
dissertation, University of Toronto]. LLBA.
Schmidt, L. B., & Willis, E. W. (2011). Systematic
investigation of voicing assimilation of Spanish /s/ in
Mexico
City. In S. M. Alvord (Ed.), Selected
proceedings of the 5th Conference on Laboratory Approaches
to Romance
Phonology (pp. 1–20). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Schwegler, A., Kempff, J., & Ameal-Guerra, A. (2010). Fonética
y fonología españolas (4th
ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Tyler, M. D., Best, C. T., Faber, A., & Levitt, A. G. (2014). Perceptual
assimilation and discrimination of non-native vowel
contrasts. Phonetica, 71(1), 4–21.
