In:Verbal Aggression in Contemporary Polish: A usage-based and perception-oriented study
Artur Świątek
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 57] 2026
► pp. xi–xiv
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
List of figures and charts
Figures
Figure 1a.Prototypical model of aggressive statements
by Maria Peisert
by Maria Peisert
Figure 2a.Role of online social networks for destructive activities
Figure 1.The average age of respondents
Figure 2.Respondents’ gender
Figure 3.Education of respondents
Figure 4.The highest level of education of respondents’ father(s)
Figure 5.The highest level of education of respondents’ mother(s)
Figure 6.The association of upbringing with respondents’ religion
Figure 7.The association of upbringing with respondents’
specific religion
specific religion
Figure 8.The current association of respondents
with organised religion
with organised religion
Figure 9.The current association of respondents
with specific religion
with specific religion
Figure 10.Membership of respondents in clubs, association,
or organizations
or organizations
Figure 11.List of verbs (1–5)
Figure 12.List of verbs (6–10)
Figure 13.List of verbs (11–15)
Figure 14.List of verbs (16–20)
Figure 15.List of nouns (1–5)
Figure 16.List of nouns (6–10)
Figure 17.Rating of items in terms of their characteristics
for respondents
for respondents
Figure 18.Respondents’ selection of situations involving
verbal aggressions
verbal aggressions
Figure 19.Respondents’ evaluation of situations (1–5)
Figure 20.Respondents’ evaluation of situations (6–10)
Figure 21.Respondents’ evaluation of situations (11–15)
Figure 22.Respondents’ evaluation of situations (16–20)
Figure 23.Respondents’ reasons for applying verbally
aggressive words
aggressive words
Figure 24.Respondents’ feelings after using verbally aggressive words
Figure 25.Respondents’ feelings in the company of someone using verbally aggressive words
Figure 26.Frequency of application of verbally aggressive words
Figure 27.Places of exposure to verbally aggressive words
Figure 28.Respondents’ evaluation of aggressiveness of words
in context (Situation 1)
in context (Situation 1)
Figure 29.Respondents’ evaluation of aggressiveness of words
in context (Situation 2)
in context (Situation 2)
Figure 30.Respondents’ evaluation of aggressiveness of words
in context (Situation 3)
in context (Situation 3)
Figure 31.Respondents’ evaluation of aggressiveness of words
in context (Situation 4)
in context (Situation 4)
Figure 32.Respondents’ evaluation of aggressiveness of words
in context (Situation 5)
in context (Situation 5)
Figure 33.Respondents’ opinions on the survey
Charts
Chart 1.nawrzucać (Pol.)
Chart 2.hurl abuse (Eng.)
Chart 3.śmieć (Pol.)
Chart 4.trash (Eng.)
Chart 5.gorszący (Pol.)
Chart 6.shameful (Eng.)
Chart 7.potwarz (Pol.)
Chart 8.slander (Eng.)
Chart 9.kreatury (Pol.)
Chart 10.creeps (Eng.)
Chart 11.sprzedawczyki (Pol.)
Chart 12.rats (Eng.)
Chart 13.mieszać z błotem (Pol.)
Chart 14.mud-sling (Eng.)
Chart 15.opluskiwać (Pol.)
Chart 16.bash (Eng.)
Chart 17.zohydzać (Pol.)
Chart 18.disgust (Eng.)
Chart 19.pogróżka (Pol.)
Chart 20.threat (Eng.)
Chart 21.dziura (Pol.)
Chart 22.backwater (Eng.)
Chart 23.groźba (Pol.)
Chart 24.menace (Eng.)
Chart 25.pruć (Pol.)
Chart 26.blast away (Eng.)
Chart 27.Context 1 (Polish)
Chart 28.Context 1 (English)
Chart 29.Context 2 (Polish)
Chart 30.Context 2 (English)
Chart 31.Context 3 (Polish)
Chart 32.Context 3 (English)
Chart 33.Context 4 (Polish)
Chart 34.Context 4 (English)
Chart 35.Context 5 (Polish)
Chart 36.Context 5 (English)
