In:Theoretical Issues in the Languages of the Caucasus
Edited by Ümit Atlamaz, Ömer Demirok and Balkız Öztürk
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 294] 2026
► pp. 339–370
Chapter 11West Circassian lessons on phase theory
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper explores the connection between the opacity of phases and their status as spellout
domains. Based on evidence from West Circassian, I argue that while a subset of phases are salient prosodic domains,
syntactic opacity is not a consequence of transfer to PF, but of standard conditions on locality. Furthermore, the
relation between phasehood and prosodic constituency holds only partially: some phases are not salient prosodic
domains. West Circassian provides a compelling illustration of this mismatch due its polysynthetic profile. On the one
hand, a complex syntactic constituent is identifiable as a prosodic domain due to being pronounced as a single
prosodic word. On the other, the connection between syntactic opacity and locality constraints is demonstrated by
dynamic phasehood which is connected to the licensing of polysynthetic ϕ-agreement.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background on West Circassian
- 3.Phases in the syntax
- 3.1Agree-based phasehood and relativization
- 3.2Variable phasehood in the narrow syntax: Cross-clausal relativization
- 3.3Phases in the syntax: Summary
- 4.Phases at the interface
- 4.1DP and CP at the interface
- 4.2vP and ApplP are not prosodic domains
- 4.3Phases at the interface: Summary
- 5.Conclusion
- Author queries
Notes References
References (61)
Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive
cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Doctoral
dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Arkadiev, Peter M., and Yakov G. Testelets. 2019. Differential
nominal marking in Circassian. Studies in
Language 43 (3): 715–751.
Arkadiev, P. M., Yu. A. Lander, A. B. Letuchiy, N. R. Sumbatova, and Ya. G. Testelets. 2009. Vvedenije. Osnovnyje svedenija ob adygejskom jazyke [Introduction: Basic information on
Adyghe]. In Aspekty polisintetizma:
Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka, ed. Ya. G. Testelets, 17–120. RGGU.
Bagirokova, Irina, and Yury Lander. 2015. Imennaja
inkorporacija v adygejskom jazyke. In IV
International Symposium of Linguist-Caucasologists: Issues of structure of stem and root in Ibero-Caucasian
languages, 104–106. Georgian National Academy of Sciences.
Barrie, Michael, and Eric Mathieu. 2016. Noun
incorporation and phrasal movement. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 34: 1–51.
Caponigro, Ivano, and Maria Polinsky. 2011. Relative
embeddings: A Circassian puzzle for the syntax/semantics
interface. NLLT 29(1): 71–122.
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions
on transformations. In A festschrift for Morris
Halle, eds. Stephen Anderson and Paul Kiparsky, 232–286. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
. 2000. Minimalist
inquiries: the framework. In Step by step: Essays on
minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, eds. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. MIT Press.
. 2008. On
phases. In Foundational issues in linguistic
theory, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 133–166. MIT Press.
Compton, Richard, and Christine Pittman. 2010. Word-formation
by phase in
inuit. Lingua 120: 2167–2192.
Dobashi, Yoshihito. 2013. Autonomy
of prosody and prosodic domain formation: A derivational approach. Linguistic
Analysis 38: 331–355.
Ershova, Ksenia. 2019. Syntactic
ergativity in West Circassian. Doctoral
dissertation, University of Chicago.
. 2020. Two
paths to polysynthesis: Evidence from West Circassian nominalizations. Natural
Language and Lingustic
Theory 38: 425–475.
. 2021. Diagnosing
clause structure in a polysynthetic language: Wh-agreement and parasitic gaps in West
Circassian. Linguistic
Inquiry 52 (1): 1–38.
. 2023a. Licensed
to license: Deficient probes in West Circassian nominalizations. Presentation
at GLOW 46.
. 2023b. Syntactic
ergativity and the theory of subjecthood: Evidence from anaphor binding in West
Circassian. Language 99 (2): 193–241.
. 2024. Phasehood
as defective intervention: Possessor extraction and selective DP islandhood in West
Circassian. Syntax 27 (2): 314–359.
Evans, Nicholas, and Hans-Jürgen Sasse. 2002. Introduction:
Problems of polysynthesis. In Problems of
polysynthesis, eds. Nicholas Evans and Hans-Jürgen Sasse, 1–13. Akademie Verlag.
Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky. 2005a. Cyclic
linearization and its interaction with other aspects of grammar: a
reply. Theoretical
Linguistics 31: 235–262.
Georgi, Doreen. 2014. Opaque
interactions of Merge and Agree: On the nature and order of elementary
operations. Doctoral dissertation, Leipzig University.
. 2017. Patterns
of movement reflexes as the result of the order of Merge and Agree. Linguistic
Inquiry 48 (4): 585–626.
Heck, Fabian, and Gereon Müller. 2003. Derivational
optimization of wh-movement. Linguistic
Analysis 33: 97–148.
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. Multiple
Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in
Japanese. In The proceedings of HUMIT
2000, eds. Ora Matushansky, Albert Costa, Javier Martin-Gonzalez, Lance Nathan, and Adam Szczegielniak, 67–80. MITWPL.
. 2005. Dimensions
of symmetry in syntax: agreement and clausal architecture. Doctoral
dissertation, MIT.
Lander, Yury. 2009a. Množestvennaja reljativizacija: podlinnaja i mnimaja [Multiple relativization: genuine and
imaginary]. In Aspekty polisintetizma: Očerki po
grammatike adygejskogo jazyka, ed. Ya. G. Testelets, 612–653. RGGU.
. 2009b. Subject
properties of the Adyghe absolutive: Evidence from relatives. Unpublished
ms. [URL]
. 2012a. Nominal
complexes in Adyghe: between morphology and syntax. Conference handout.
Typology, Theory:
Caucasus, IFEA, Istanbul, 1 December 2012.
. 2012b. Reljativizacija v polisintetičeskom jazyke: adygejskie otnositel’nye konstrukcii v
tipologičeskoj perspektive [Relativization in a
polysynthetic language: Adyghe relative clauses in a typological
perspective]. Doctoral dissertation, Russian State University for the Humanities.
. 2017. Nominal
complex in West Circassian: Between morphology and syntax. Studies in
Language 41 (1): 76–98.
Lander, Yury, and Michael Daniel. 2019. West
Caucasian relative pronouns as
resumptives. Linguistics 57 (6): 1239–1270.
Lander, Yury, Oleg Belyaev, and Irina Bagirokova. 2021. (Almost)
everything is oblique in West
Circassian. In Proceedings of the LFG’21 Conference,
On-Line, eds. Miriam Butt, Jamie Y. FIndlay, and Ida Toivonen, 223–242. CSLI Publications.
Lander, Yury A., and Yakov G. Testelets. 2017. Adyghe
(Northwest Caucasian). In The Oxford handbook of
polysynthesis, eds. Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun, and Nicholas Evans, 948–970. Oxford University Press.
Martinović, Martina. 2015. Feature
geometry and head-splitting: Evidence from the Wolof clausal
periphery. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.
. to
appear. [-Person] and [+Person] resumption in
Igala. In Proceedings of WCCFL
40. [URL]
McGinnis, Martha. 2000. Phases
and the syntax of applicatives. In NELS
31, eds. Min-Joo Kim and Uri Strauss, 333–349. GLSA.
. 2001. Variation
in the phase structure of applicatives. Linguistic Variation
Yearbook 1: 105–146.
. 2011. Constraints
on displacement: A phase-based approach. John Benjamins.
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The
representation of third person and its consequences for person-case
effects. Natural Language & Linguistic
Theory 25 (2): 273–313.
. 2011. Multiple
agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural
Language and Linguistic
Theory 29 (4): 939–971.
Newell, Heather. 2008. Aspects
of the morphology and phonology of phases. Doctoral
dissertation, McGill University.
Rackowski, Andrea, and Norvin Richards. 2005. Phase
edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic
Inquiry 36 (4): 565–599.
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement
and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. The MIT Press.
Sande, Hannah, Peter Jenks, and Sharon Inkelas. 2020. Cophonologies
by ph(r)ase. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory 38: 1211–1261.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The
syntax-phonology interface, 2nd edn.
In The handbook of phonological
theory, eds. John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle, and Alan Yu. Wiley Blackwell.
Serdobolskaya, N. V. 2009. Vtoroje buduš’eje, infinitiv, masdar i supin v adygejskom jazyke: argumenty za i protiv jedinoj
traktovki [Second future, infinitive, masdar and supinum in
Adyghe: Pro and contra their unification]. In Aspekty
polisintetizma: Očerki po grammatike adygejskogo jazyka, ed. Ya. G. Testelets, 454–497. RGGU.
Smith, Jennifer L. 2011. Category-specific
effects. In The Blackwell companion to
phonology, eds. Marc van Oosterndorp, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume, and Keren Rice, 2439–2463. Wiley-Blackwell.
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. Multiple
spell-out. In Working
minimalism, eds. S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein. MIT Press.
van Urk, Coppe. 2020. Successive
cyclicity and the syntax of long-distance dependencies. Annual Review of
Linguistics.
