Cover not available

Article In: The Mental Lexicon: Online-First Articles

Men and women are from the same planet

Gender similarities in perspective-taking abilities

 | McMaster University
 | HSE University
ORCiD logo with link | HSE University
 | HSE University
 | McMaster University
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The study examines emotional responses to words representing a wide range of psychological valence and focuses on gender-related differences. We aimed to find out whether men and women differ in their emotional responses, and whether they can take the perspective of another gender. We used the slider paradigm (Warriner, A. B., Shore, D. I., Schmidt, L. A., Imbault, C. L., & Kuperman, V. (2017). Sliding into happiness: A new tool for measuring affective responses to words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 71–88. [URL]. ): participants saw a humanoid manikin, a scale and a word on the screen and were instructed to place the manikin as close to, or as far away from, the word as they believed the person represented by the manikin would prefer to be. A change in the shape of the manikin (we used the bathroom figures of a man and a woman) signaled the perspective that the participant was asked to adopt. To assess the cross-linguistic validity of the findings, we collected data from English and Russian.
We found that women showed a wider range of emotional responses, while men displayed a flatter affect. Participants changed their response strategy in the right direction when estimating words for the opposite gender. The study showed a degree of universality in perspective-taking, demonstrating that both men and women are aware of the emotional preferences of the opposite gender.
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Gender differences in emotional reactivity
    • Gender differences in perspective-taking
  • Present study
  • Experiment 1
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Stimuli
      • Procedure
      • Variables
      • Statistical Analyses
  • Results
  • Experiment 2
    • Method
      • Participants
      • Stimuli
      • Procedure, variables and statistical analyses
  • Results
  • General discussion
  • Author queries
  • References
References (52)
References
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751–758. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benenson, J. F., Gauthier, E., & Markovits, H. (2021). Girls exhibit greater empathy than boys following a minor accident. Scientific Reports, 111, 7965. [URL]
Botwin, M. D., Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 65(1), 107–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., New, B., & Keuleers, E. (2012). Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 991–997. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 735–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaplin, T. M. (2015). Gender and emotion expression: A developmental contextual perspective. Emotion Review, 7(1), 14–21. [URL].
Chapman, R. M., Gardner, M. N., & Lyons, M. (2022). Gender differences in emotional connotative meaning of words measured by Osgood’s semantic differential techniques in young adults. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 91, Article 126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deng, Y., Chang, L., Yang, M., Huo, M., & Zhou, R. (2016). Gender differences in emotional response: Inconsistency between experience and expressivity. PLOS ONE, 11(6), e0158666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Batson, C. D. (2007). Social neuroscience approaches to interpersonal sensitivity. Social Neuroscience, 2(3–4), 151–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, A. H., Kret, M. E., & Broekens, J. (2018). Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: A test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis. PLOS ONE, 13(1), e0190712. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships. HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, J. A., Carter, J. D., & Horgan, T. G. (2000). Gender differences in nonverbal communication of emotion. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 97–117). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hojat, M. (2016). Empathy and gender: Are men and women complementary or opposite sexes? In Empathy in health professions education and patient care (pp. 169–187). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 651, 373–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibáñez, A., Huepe, D., Gempp, R., Gutiérrez, V., Rivera-Rei, A., & Toledo, M. I. (2013). Empathy, sex and fluid intelligence as predictors of theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(5), 616–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imbault, C., & Kuperman, V. (2018). Emotional reactivity and perspective-taking in individuals with and without severe depressive symptoms. Scientific Reports, 81, Article 25708. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janschewitz, K. (2008). Taboo, emotionally valenced, and emotionally neutral word norms. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1065–1074. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kessler, K., Cao, L., O’Shea, K. J., & Wang, H. (2014). A cross-culture, cross-gender comparison of perspective taking mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1785), 20140388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawrence, K., Campbell, R., & Skuse, D. (2015). Age, gender, and puberty influence the development of facial emotion recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 61, Article 761. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leifeld, P. (2013). texreg: Conversion of statistical model output in R to LaTeX and HTML tables. Journal of Statistical Software, 55(8), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, T. P., & Davis, J. L. (2014). The effect of status on role-taking accuracy. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 848–865. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyashevskaya, O. N., & Sharoff, S. A. (2009). Frequency dictionary of modern Russian based on the Russian National Corpus. Azbukovnik. [URL]
Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. C. (2014). Judgments of subtle facial expressions of emotion. Emotion, 14(2), 349–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Frías, M. D., & Tur, A. M. (2009). Are women more empathetic than men? A longitudinal study in adolescence. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 76–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyers, N. (Director). (2000). What women want [Film]. Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2012). Gender differences in the Big Five personality development: A longitudinal investigation from late adolescence to emerging adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(6), 740–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montefinese, M., Ambrosini, E., Fairfield, B., & Mammarella, N. (2014). The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 887–903. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morier, D., & Seroy, C. (1994). The effect of interpersonal expectancies on men’s self-presentation of gender role attitudes to women. Sex Roles, 31(7–8), 493–504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 211–236. [URL]
Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 21–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polce-Lynch, M., Myers, B. J., Kilmartin, C. T., Forssmann-Falck, R., & Kliewer, W. (1998). Gender and age patterns in emotional expression, body image, and self-esteem: A qualitative analysis. Sex Roles, 38(11–12), 1025–1048. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. D. (2004). The effect of social role on theory of mind reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 95(1), 91–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167–177. [URL]
Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, S. M., Agrawal, M., … & Ungar, L. H. (2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLOS ONE, 8(9), e73791. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shankman, A. (Director). (2009). What men want [Film]. Paramount Pictures.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, C. T., Shepperd, J. A., Miller, W. A., & Graber, J. A. (2015). Perspective taking explains gender differences in late adolescents’ attitudes toward disadvantaged groups. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(7), 1283–1293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solovyev, V. D., Islamov, M., & Bayrasheva, V. (2022). Dictionary with the evaluation of positivity/negativity degree of the Russian words. In Lecture notes in networks and systems (Vol. 4491, pp. 651–664). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stiver, K. A., & Alonzo, S. H. (2009). Parental and mating effort: Is there necessarily a trade-off? Ethology, 115(12), 1101–1126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, D. L. (1972). Role-taking and power in social psychology. American Sociological Review, 37(5), 605–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Graaff, J., Branje, S., De Wied, M., Hawk, S., Van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 881–888. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2017). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner, H. L., Buck, R., & Winterbotham, M. (1993). Communication of specific emotions: Gender differences in sending accuracy and communication measures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17(1), 29–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. [URL].
Warriner, A. B., Shore, D. I., Schmidt, L. A., Imbault, C. L., & Kuperman, V. (2017). Sliding into happiness: A new tool for measuring affective responses to words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 71–88. [URL].
Wells, L. J., Gillespie, S. M., & Rotshtein, P. (2016). Identification of emotional facial expressions: Effects of expression, intensity, and sex on eye gaze. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0168307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheelwright, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., Smith, R., … & Wakabayashi, A. (2006). Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ). Brain Research, 1079(1), 47–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. [URL].
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue