Cover not available

Article In: The Mental Lexicon: Online-First Articles

Effects of vocabulary size on the perception of L2 phonological categories

ORCiD logo with link | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
 | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
 | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
ORCiD logo with link | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
For decades, bilingualism has been a topic of interest in speech perception research. Published studies aim to explain whether and how one can acquire phonological categories from an additional language that are not present in the first one. There is also an ongoing hypothesis that the size of second-language vocabulary contributes to the effective acquisition of L2 phonological categories. However, few studies have investigated this issue in foreign language learning (i.e., when a language is learned in a context where it is not widely spoken in the surrounding community). This is what the present study aims to investigate. An experiment consisting of an auditory AX categorization task and a vocabulary size test was conducted with 27 Brazilian Portuguese speakers. The results indicate a potential association between a more extensive second-language vocabulary and the ability to contrast L1 and L2 sounds more effectively.
Article outline
  • Speech Perception of L2 Phonological Categories
  • Methods
    • Participants
    • Stimuli
    • Analyses
    • Results
  • Discussion
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
  • References
References (38)
References
Balas, A. (2018). English vowel perception by Polish advanced learners of English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 63(3), 309–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, Catherine. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In book: Speech perception and linguistic experience: theoretical and methodological issues (pp.171–204) Publisher: Timonium: New York PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, 13–34. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. (2025). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.4.46, retrieved 20 October 2025 from [URL]
Bundgaard-Nielsen, Rikke & Best, Catherine & Tyler, Michael. (2011). Vocabulary size matters: The assimilation of second-language Australian English vowels to first-language Japanese vowel categories. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 51–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., Kroos, C., & Tyler, M. D. (2012). Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 643–664. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment — Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available at [URL]
Cochrane, R. M. (1980). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese children and adults learning English as a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1(4), 331–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dai, H., Versfeld, N. J., & Green, D. M. (1996). The optimum decision rules in the same-different paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(1), 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Boersma, P., Rauber, A. S., Bion, R. A. H. (2009). A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1379–1393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 233–277. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, 319–355. Berlin; New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-089509-9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.) [hardcover]. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-8058-5497-8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgiou, G. P., Perfilieva, N. V., & Tenizi, M. (2020). Vocabulary Size Leads to Better Attunement to L2 Phonetic Differences: Clues from Russian Learners of English. Language Learning and Development, 16(4), 382–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hautus, M. J. Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 271, 46–51 (1995). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
John Fox (2003). Effect Displays in R for Generalized Linear Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingston, J., & Macmillan, N. A. (1995). Integrality of nasalization and F 1 in vowels in isolation and before oral and nasal consonants: A detection-theoretic application of the Garner paradigm. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(2), 1261–1285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoblauch, K. (2023). psyphy: Functions for Analyzing Psychophysical. Data in R. 〈〉, R package version 0.3, 〈[URL]〉.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 441, 325–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, A., Harris, K., Hoffman, H. & Griffith, B. (1957). The Discrimination of Speech Sounds within and across Phoneme Boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 541, 358–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llompart, M. (2021). Phonetic categorization ability and vocabulary size contribute to the encoding of difficult second-language phonological contrasts into the lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(3), 481–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macmillan, N. A. (2002). Signal detection theory. In: Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology. 3rd ed. Hal Pashler, editor-in-chief. Volume 4: Methodology in experimental psychology, p. 43–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., Kaplan, H. L., & Creelman, C. D. (1977). The psychophysics of categorical perception. Psychological Review, 84(5), 452–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1990). Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and “nonparametric” indexes. Psychological bulletin, 107(3), 401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rauber, Andreia & Escudero, Paola & Bion, Ricardo & Baptista, Barbara. (2005). The interrelation between the perception and production of English vowels by native speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of Interspeech, 2913–2916. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team (2025). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 〈[URL]〉.
Schouten, M. E. H., & Van Hessen, A. J. (1992). Modeling phoneme perception. I: Categorical perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(4), 1841–1855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, J. Y., & Eckman, F. (2024). The relationship between L2 learners’ production and perception of English vowels: The role of native-speaker acoustic patterns in production. Second Language Research, 41(2), 309–338. (Original work published 2025)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Souza, H. K. (2017). Brazilian EFL learners’ awareness about L2 phones: Is mall pronounced as ‘mal’? Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, 56(1), 235–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hessen, A. J., & Schouten, M. E. H. (1992). Modeling phoneme perception. II: A model of stop consonant discrimination. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(4), 1856–1868. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leussen, J.-W., & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: the L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yazawa, K., Whang, J., Kondo, M., and Escudero, P. (2023). Feature-driven new sound category formation: computational implementation with the L2LP model and beyond. Front. Lang. Sci. 21:1303511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yazawa, K. (2024). NEW sounds can be easier to learn than SIMILAR sounds, but only when acoustic cues are FAMILIAR. Tsukuba English Studies, 421, 305–325.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
References
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2022). Praat: doing phonetics by computer ƐComputer program]. Version 6.2.18, retrieved 2 September 2022 from [URL]
Lehiste, Ilse (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue