Article In: Metaphor and the Social World: Online-First Articles
When university is a journey
The deliberate use of journey metaphors on university websites
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This article aims to determine the suggestive potential of journey metaphors deliberately used on university websites. The data of the research comprises homepage texts from 100 American university websites. The Critical Metaphor Analysis is applied as a primary method that consists of three stages: Identification, Interpretation, and Explanation. The Identification stage demonstrates that the university is represented through the journey source domain, which encompasses the elements: start, path, path-making, obstacles, exploration, and destination. The Interpretation stage reveals six metaphorical mappings, with the most frequent one — student — a pathmaker, highlighting the importance of prospective students to the universities. The Explanation stage outlines the rhetorical and ideological functions of the journey metaphors: reducing applicants’ admission anxiety and naturalizing a neoliberal vision of higher education rooted in individualism, the “American Dream,” and pragmatism. The findings show that the university is a journey metaphor constructs an attractive digital image of the institution by framing education as a personal investment and unlimited social mobility, while obscuring systemic inequalities and the commodified nature of contemporary academia.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Analysis
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Pre-metaphor analysis
- 4.2Metaphor identification
- 4.3Metaphor interpretation
- 4.3.1university — start of a journey
- 4.3.2study opportunities — paths
- 4.3.3student — a pathmaker
- 4.3.4uniformity of studying/ knowledge — a traffic obstacle
- 4.3.5study process — exploration
- 4.3.6university — destination
- 4.4Metaphor explanation
- 5.Conclusion
- Author queries
References
References (36)
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Arisoy, B. (2022). Digitalization in Education. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17 (5), 1799–1811.
Askehave, I. (2007). The Impact of Marketization on Higher Education Genres — The International Student Prospectus as a Case in Point. Discourse Studies, 9 (6), 723–742.
Barnabe, F. (2004). From ivory towers to learning organizations: The role of system dynamics in the ‘managerialization’ of academic institutions. Learning Organization, 11 (3), 169–180.
Caballero, R. (2006). Journey metaphors in foreign language teaching-learning: Ways of travelling and learning in multimedia. ResearchGate.
Cibulskiene, J. (2012). The development of the journey metaphor in political discourse. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(2), 131–153.
David, G., & Furko, B. P. (2015). The journey metaphor in mediatized political discourse. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae: Philologica, 7 (2), 7–20.
Deignan, A. (2011). Deliberateness is not unique to metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 1 (1), 57–60.
Dziatkovskii, A. & Dzyatkovskaya, E. (2023). Analog modeling of education for sustainable development in a unified educational space. E3S Web of Conferences, 420.10.1051.
Holsti, O. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison- Wesley Publisher.
Imani, A. (2022). Critical metaphor analysis: A systematic step-by-step guideline. LSP International Journal, 9 (1), 1–15.
Katz, A. N. (1996). On interpreting statements as metaphor or irony: Contextual heuristics and cognitive consequences. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 1–22). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kuta, K. W. (2008). Reading and writing to learn: strategies across the curriculum. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Landau, M. J., Oyserman, J., Keefer, L. A. & Smith, G. C. (2014). The college journey and academic engagement: How metaphor use enhances identity-based motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106 (5), 679–698.
Linkeviciute, V. (2019). Conceptual metaphors in Donald Trump’s political discourse: Politics domain (2018). Studies About Languages, 341, 46–55.
Mayer-Schonberger, V. & Oberlechner, T. (2002). Through their own words: Towards a new understanding of leadership through metaphors. Social Science Research Network.
Melewar, T. C., & Akel, S. (2005). The role of corporate identity in the higher education sector — a case study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10 (1), 41–57.
Muller, C. (2011). Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really special?” Metaphor and the Social World, 1 (1), 61–66.
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ortony, A. (1975). Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25 (1), 45–53.
Polat, S. & Celik, C. (2022). University websites: attractive or casual? Higher Education Governance and Policy, 3 (1), 16–28.
Reijnierse, W. G., Steen, G., Burgers, C., & Krennmayr, T. (2018). DMIP: a method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2 (2), 129–147.
Silaski, N. & Durovic, T. (2019). The journey metaphor in Brexit-related political cartoons. Discourse, Context and Media, 311, 100318.
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23 (4), 213–241.
(2023). Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 141, 1242888.
(2007). Finding metaphor in grammar and usage: A methodological analysis of theory and research. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(2011). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de, 2011, (21), 83–110.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, J. (2020). A comparative analysis of JOURNEY metaphors in marketing English. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7 (5), 304–313.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory, and Methodology. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1–33). Sage.