Cover not available

Article In: Metaphor and the Social World: Online-First Articles

Metaphors of happiness in Spanish

Ratings of affective valence, imageability, and familiarity

ORCiD logo with link | Universidad Católica del Uruguay
ORCiD logo with link | Universidad Católica del Uruguay
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper investigates the affective dimension of metaphor meaning. Previous research has extensively examined the role of metaphor conventionality in metaphor comprehension, however, less attention has been given to whether the level of conventionality — a metaphor’s familiarity or salience — is related to its affective component. This study addresses that question in the context of happiness metaphors in Spanish. The study has two main objectives. First, metaphorical expressions related to happiness were identified and categorized into conceptual metaphors using a sample of language taken from the Corpus del Español. Second, sixty participants evaluated 96 metaphorical expressions of happiness in terms of affective valence strength, familiarity, and imageability. The ratings revealed strong correlations among the three variables: metaphors that were more familiar and easier to imagine tended to be associated with more extreme affective valence values. Nevertheless, subsequent regression-based mediation analysis suggested that the influence of familiarity on valence may be mediated by imageability. The findings are discussed in relation to embodied models of conceptual metaphor representation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Comprehension of metaphorical and literal expressions: The role of salience
    • 1.2Affective component of metaphor meaning
    • 1.3Metaphors of happiness across cultures
  • 2.Study 1: Corpus analysis of metaphors of happiness in Spanish
    • 2.1Method
      • 2.1.1Corpus
      • 2.1.2Procedure
      • 2.1.3Metaphor identification
    • 2.2Results
  • 3.Study 2: Norming of valence, imageability and familiarity
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Materials
      • 3.1.3Procedure
    • 3.2Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • Author queries
  • References
References (39)
References
Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M. (2007). Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 30 (1160), 69–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baiocco, L., Kielar, A., & Lai, V. T. (2026). Metaphor comprehension in neurotypical adults: A scoping review of event related potential studies. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19 (8), 1905–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (1999). Metaphor Comprehension: FromComparison to Categorization. Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 90–95). Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., & Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119 (3), 149–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Citron, F. M., & Goldberg, A. E. (2014). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26 (11), 2585–2595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Citron, F. M., Cacciari, C., Funcke, J. M., Hsu, C. T., & Jacobs, A. M. (2019). Idiomatic expressions evoke stronger emotional responses in the brain than literal sentences, Neuropsychologia, 1311, 233–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, P. (2010). A cognitive study of “Happiness” metaphors in English and Chinese idioms. Asian Culture and History, 2 (2), P172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiarello, C., Shears, C., & Lund, K. (1999). Imageability and distributional typicality measures of nouns and verbs in contemporary English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(4), 603–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dymarska, A., Connell, L., & Banks, B. (2025). Weaker than you might imagine: Determining imageability effects on word recognition, Journal of Memory and Language, 1291, 104398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor & Symbolic Activity, 2(4), 239–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forgács, B. (2014). Figures of language in cognitive science in the light of figurative language processing in the brain [Doctoral dissertation, Budapest University of Technology and Economics].
Gibbs, G. (1998). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford Brooks University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, R. (1996). Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 271: 000Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hailu, G. N., Abdelkader, M., Meles, H. A., & Teklu, T. (2024). Understanding the support needs and challenges faced by family caregivers in the care of their older adults at home. A Qualitative Study. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 14(19), 481–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamdi, S. (2015). A Cognitive Study of happiness metaphors in English, Tunisian Arabic and Spanish. Arab World English Journal, 61, 132–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horton, W. S. (2013). Character intimacy influences the processing of metaphoric utterances during narrative comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 281, 148–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D. (2018). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 641–671. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katz, A. & Paivio, A., Marschark, M. & Clark, J. (1988). Norms for 204 Literary and 260 Nonliterary Metaphors on 10 Psychological Dimensions. Metaphor and Symbol, 31, 191–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lai, V. T., Curran, T., & Menn, L. (2009). Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study. Brain Research, 11(1284), 145–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2009). Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor and culture. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Philologica, 2(2), 197–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation Analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 593–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mon, S. K., Nencheva, M., Citron, F. M. M., Lew-Williams, C., & Goldberg, A. (2021). Conventional metaphors elicit greater real-time engagement than literal paraphrases or concrete sentences, Journal of Memory and Language, 1211, 104285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, C. & Tag, S. (2010). The dynamics of metaphor: foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 101, 85–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomp, J., Bestgen, A. K., Schulze, P., Müller, C. J., Citron, F. M. M., Suchan, B., & Kuchinke, L. (2018). Lexical olfaction recruits olfactory orbitofrontal cortex in metaphorical and literal contexts, Brain and Language, 1791, 11–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: an integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development Psychopathology, 17(3), 715–734. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 401, 879–891. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raghunath, B. L., Mulatti, C., Neoh, M. J. Y., Bornstein, M. H., & Esposito, G. (2021). The associations between imageability of positive and negative valence words and fear reactivity. Psychiatry International, 21, 32–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reali, F., & Lleras, M. (2017). Perspectives in motion: The case of metaphorical temporal statements in Spanish. Language and Cognition, 9 (1), 172–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, A., Ramos, M., & Valenzuela, J. (2014). The emotional impact of translation: A heart rate study. Journal of Pragmatics, 711, 314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soriano, C. (2003). Some anger metaphors in Spanish and English. A contrastive review. International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 107–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soriano, C., & Pieta, A. (2022). The affect bias in the metaphorical representation of anticipated events. Metaphor and the Social World, 12 (1), 115–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sopory, P. (2005). Metaphor and Affect. Poetics Today, 261, 433–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2002). Relevance theory. In D. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Relevance theory (pp. 607–632). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue