Ulrich Busse

is author/editor of the following titles:

Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A contribution to historical pragmatics

Edited by Ulrich Busse and Axel Hübler

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 220] 2012. vii, 292 pp.

Linguistic Variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic variability of second person pronouns

Ulrich Busse

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 106] 2002. xiv, 344 pp.

is author of the following articles:

Busse, Ulrich. 2020. ““Divided by a common language”?”. In Late Modern English: Novel encounters, 185–202

Busse, Ulrich. 2018. “Lear’s questions revisited”. In Revisiting Shakespeare's Language, 60–80

Busse, Ulrich. 2015. “Transatlantic perspectives on late nineteenth-century English usage”. In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English, 73–97

Hübler, Axel and Ulrich Busse. 2012. “Introduction”. In Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A contribution to historical pragmatics, 1–16

Busse, Ulrich. 2011. “Review of Nakayasu (2009): The Pragmatics of Modals in Shakespeare ”. In Understanding Historical (Im)Politeness, 306–308

Busse, Ulrich and Anne Schröder. 2009. “Fowler’s Modern English Usage at the interface of lexis and grammar”. In Exploring the Lexis–Grammar Interface, 69–87

Busse, Ulrich. 2008. “An inventory of directives in Shakespeare's King Lear ”. In Speech Acts in the History of English, 85–114

Busse, Ulrich. 2007. “Review of Blake (2002): A Grammar of Shakespeare’s Language & Hope (2003): Shakespeare’s Grammar ”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8:1, 127–137

Busse, Ulrich. 2005. “Review of Becker (2003): Familiar Dialogues in Englyssh and Frenche. Sprachliche Interaktion und ihre Vermittlung in der frühen Neuzeit ”. In The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers, 343–348

Busse, Ulrich. 2003. “9. The co-occurrence of nominal and pronominal address froms in the Shakespeare Corpus”. In Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems, 193–221

Busse, Ulrich. 2001. “The use of address pronouns in Early Modern English”. In Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress, 119