Cover not available

Article In: Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

¿Cómo va a ser posible?

The situated meanings of periphrastic and synthetic future-inflected wh-interrogatives in Spanish

ORCiD logo with link | Freie Universität Berlin
 | KU Leuven
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
We analyze the use and distribution of Spanish synthetic and periphrastic future-inflected wh-interrogatives in a corpus of informal Spanish conversations, within Linell’s (2009) Dialogical Theory of Language. Our corpus analysis reveals that future-inflected interrogatives realize three types of discourse functions: information requests, interactional challenges, and requests for inference, each clearly distinguishable in terms of their distribution at the sentence and discourse level. The results highlight the importance of speaker attitude and, particularly, their expectations regarding the answerability of the request. Use of the synthetic future is common in invitations to inference, in which the hearer is not expected to be able to answer the question, whereas use of the periphrastic future is prototypical in requests for information and interactional challenges, indicating a grammaticalization path towards modal meanings. Our findings underscore the value of corpus-based pragmatic analysis for understanding how grammatical choices reflect interactional meaning-making.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Modality and evidentiality in Spanish future constructions
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.The situated meanings of Spanish future-inflected wh-interrogatives
    • 4.1Types of situated meanings
    • 4.2Distribution across linguistic and contextual variables
  • 5.The distribution of SF and PF
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (68)
References
Aaron, Jessi Elana. 2010. “Pushing the Envelope: Looking beyond the Variable Context.” Language Variation and Change 221: 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “A Certain Future: Epistemicity, Prediction, and Assertion in Iberian Spanish Future Expression.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7 (2): 215–240. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2016. “‘Wie geil ist das denn?’ Eine neue Konstruktion im Netzwerk ihrer Nachbarn.” Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 44 (1): 69–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, José Luis. 2008. “The Variable Expression of Future Tense in Peninsular Spanish: The present (and Future) of Inflectional Forms in the Spanish Spoken in a Bilingual Region.” Language Variation and Change 20 (1): 85–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Laura Vincze, and Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2018. “Questions and Epistemic Stance: Some Examples from Italian Conversations.” Ampersand 51: 29–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins. 1991. “Back to the Future.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 16–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano, and Jon Sprouse. 2007. “Rhetorical Questions as Questions.” In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 111, ed. by Louise McNally, and Estela Puig-Waldmüller, 121–133. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerović, Marijana. 2016. “When Suspects Ask Questions: Rhetorical Questions as a Challenging Device.” Journal of Pragmatics 1051: 18–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 1999. “Irony in Conversation.” Language in Society 28 (4): 523–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela, and Massimo Moneglia. 2005. C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” In Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2012. “What Drives Sequences?” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 61–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egg, Markus. 2007. “Meaning and Use of Rhetorical Questions.” In Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium (1): 73–78. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehmer, Oliver, and Malte Rosemeyer. 2018. “When ‘Questions’ Are Not Questions. Inferences and Conventionalization in Spanish But-Prefaced Partial Interrogatives.” In Open Linguistics 41: 70–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J., Penelope Brown, and Jan P. De Ruiter. 2012. “Epistemic Dimensions of Polar Questions: Sentence-Final Particles in Comparative Perspective.” In Questions, ed. by Jan De Ruiter, 193–221. West Nyack: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata. 2018. “On the Grammaticalization of the Deverbal Epistemic Pragmatic Marker sabes: A Study in Recent Language Change.” Revue roumaine de linguistique [Romanian review of linguistics] 631: 341–360.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. 2010. “Futuro y evidencialidad.” Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 261: 9–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Evidential Futures: The Case of Spanish.” In Future Tense vs. Future Time: An Introduction, ed. by Philippe De Brabanter, Mikhail Kissine, and Saghie Sharifzadeh, 219–246. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Evidential Commitment and Feature Mismatch in Spanish estar Constructions.” Journal of Pragmatics 1281: 102–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria, and Manuel Leonetti. 2021. “Spanish ‘Mirative Future’.” In Expressive Meaning Across Linguistic Levels and Frameworks, ed. by Andreas Trotzke, and Xavier Villalba, 167–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Henrik Bergqvist, and Lila San Roque. 2018. “The Grammar of Engagement I: Framework and Initial Exemplification.” In Language and Cognition 101: 110–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1996. “The Pragmatics of Constructions.” In Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language, ed. by Dan Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis, and Guo Jiansheng. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2008. “Topicalization and Preverbal Subjects in Spanish Wh-Interrogatives.” In Selected Proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Joyce Bruhn de Garavito, and Elena Valenzuela, 225–236. Somerville: Cascadilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2106–2119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru. 2013. “Question Design in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Malden: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Questioning in Medicine. In Why Do You Ask? The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice Freed, and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action. Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Malden: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Mercedes Tubino-Blanco. 2023. “Inferential Interrogatives with qué in Spanish.” Languages 8 (4): 282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre, and Esperanza Eguía Padilla. 2017. Proyecto COLA. Corpus Oral de Languaje Adolescente. [URL] 〈21-12-2017〉.
Koshik, Irene. 2003. “Wh-Questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies 51: 51–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 2009. “Joint Construction of Humorous Fictions in Conversation. An Unnamed Narrative Activity in a Playful Keying.” Journal of Literary Theory 3 (3): 195–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam, and Martin Maiden. 2016. The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009a. “Constructions in Dialogue.” In Contexts and Constructions, ed. by Alexander Bergs, and Gabriele Diewald, 97–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcos Marín, Francisco. 2017. Corpus oral de referencia de la lengua española contemporánea. Available online at [URL]. Last access 20/01/2017.
Marín Arrese, Juana. 2017. “Multifunctionality of Evidential Expressions in Discourse Domains and Genres: Evidence from Cross-Linguistic Case Studies.” In Evidentiality Revisited. Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Juana Marín Arrese, Gerda Haßler, and Marta Carretero, 195–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matos Amaral, Patrícia, and Scott A. Schwenter. 2003. “Contrast and the (Non-)Ocurrence of Subject Pronouns.” In Selected Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by David Eddington, 116–127. Somerville: Cascadilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matte Bon, Francisco, and Ma del Pilar Hernández Mercedes. 2007. “Las maneras de hablar del futuro en español: Del sistema codificado a las interpretaciones contextuales.” MarcoELE: Revista de Didáctica 51: 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2016. “How Fascinating! Insubordinate Exclamations.” In Insubordination, ed. by Nicholas Evans, and Honoré Watanabe, 367–392. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montes, Rosa Graciela. 1999. “The Development of Discourse Markers in Spanish: Interjections.” In Journal of Pragmatics 31 (10): 1289–1319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Lindsy Lee. 2007. WH-Interrogatives in Spoken French: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Their Form and Function. PhD thesis. University of Texas at Austin.
Olbertz, Hella. 1998. Verbal Periphrases in a Functional Grammar of Spanish. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orozco, Rafael. 2005. “Distribution of Future Time Forms in Northern Colombian Spanish.” In Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by David Eddington, 56–65. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. 2012. “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sydnell, and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RAE/ASALE. 2009. Nueva Gramática de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reig Alamilio, Asela. 2019. “Las interrogativas hipotéticas con qué invariable en español: Un tipo de interrogativas parciales marcadas.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12 (1): 155–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Janina. 2019. “Regularity and Variation in French Direct Interrogatives: The Morphosyntax and Intonation of Question Forms in Reality TV Shows, Audio Books and Teaching Materials.” PhD thesis. University of Konstanz. [URL]
Rivero, María Luisa. 2014. “Spanish Inferential and Mirative Futures and Conditionals: An Evidential Gradable Modal Proposal.” Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 151 (B): 197–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Rosique, Susana. 2019. El futuro en español. Tiempo, conocimiento, interacción. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2018. “The Pragmatics of Spanish Postposed-Wh-Interrogatives.” Folia Linguistica 52 (2): 283–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Brazilian Portuguese in-situ Wh-Interrogatives between Rhetoric and Change.” Glossa 4(1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte, and María Sol Sansiñena. 2022. “How Sentence Type Influences the Interpretation of Spanish Future Constructions.” In Functions of Language 29 (1): 116–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (2001). Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2001. “The Internal Structure of Evidentiality in Romance.” Studies in Language 25 (2): 297–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Disentangling Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Romance.” Lingua 114 (7): 873–895. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 21: 447–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 251: 701–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2010. “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2018. “Inferencing, Reanalysis, and the History of the French est-ce que Question.” Open Linguistics 41: 56–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue