Cover not available

Article In: Pragmatics: Online-First Articles

Verbo-visual metafunctions and interactional metadiscourse strategic cues in Arabic advertisements

Verbo-visual strategies in Arabic ads

ORCiD logo with link | Jordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbid
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This research examines the visual metafunctions employed to construct video images in Arabic advertisements. Additionally, it scrutinizes the accompanying verbal captions present in these visual images. The study aims to elucidate the collaborative interplay between visual and verbal strategic choices and their collective contribution to the overall efficacy of the video advertisements. To this end, the study analyzed 100 Arabic video ads from three telecom companies — Umniah, Orange, and Zain — using Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar multimodal analysis framework and Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Bodmin: MPG Books Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar interactional metadiscourse. The findings reveal that advertisers strategically position visual elements, such as focal placement, close personal distance, frontal eye-level contact, and gaze, alongside verbal cues, including direct address pronouns, directives, interrogatives, and attitude markers, to foster viewer engagement, establish social relationships, and convey key promotional messages effectively. The findings indicate that the strategic positioning of visuals, combined with verbal interactional markers, significantly enhances the persuasive impact of the ads. This research extends the existing literature by focusing specifically on Arabic-language advertisements and offering insights into how multimodal cues collaboratively enhance persuasive communication. It also offers valuable implications for practitioners and scholars aiming to optimize ad effectiveness across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Dataset and procedure of data analysis
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1Representational metafunction of verbo-visual images
    • 4.2Interactive/ interactional meta-function of verbo-visual images
      • 4.2.1Interaction between visual interactive and verbal interactional resources in ad images
    • 4.3Compositional metafunction
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Author queries
  • References
References (38)
References
Al-Ali, Mohammed. 2018. “Genre-Pragmatic Analysis of Arabic Academic Book Reviews.” Pragmatics 28 (2): 159–183.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Ali, Mohammed, Meera Sahawneh, and Safa Hamzeh. 2024. “How to Get More Views.” Internet Pragmatics 7 (2): 272–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Ali, Mohammed, and Safa Hamzeh. 2024. “Extra Cues Extra Views: A Multimodal Detection of Arabic Clickbait Thumbnail Verbo-visual Cues.” Discourse and Communication 18 (1): 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Subhi, Aish. 2022. “Metadiscourse in Online Advertising: Exploring Linguistic and Visual Metadiscourse in Social Media Advertisements.” Journal of Pragmatics 1871: 24–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. London: ContinuumGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowman, Douglas, Carrie Heilman, and P. B. Seetharaman. 2004. “Determinants of Product-Use Compliance Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research 41 (3): 324–338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Clare. 2017. “Why YouTube Thumbnails Matter.” Octoly Magazine, October. Available at: [URL] (accessed 8 October 2023).
Cheung, Bruce. 1993. “Text Analysis of Direct Mail Sales Letters.” In Perspectives of English for Professional Communication, ed. by Timothy Boswood, Robert Hoffman, and Peter Tung, 271–88. Hong Kong: City Polytechnic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cialdini, Robert. 2006. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Revised edition. Collins Business Essentials.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deng, Liqiong, and Marshall Poole. 2010. “Affect in Web Interfaces: A Study of the Impacts of Web Page Visual Complexity and Order.” MIS Quarterly 34 (4): 711–730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dragieva, Yuliana. 2014. “Possible Effects of Social Proof, Commitment, and Consistency on Consumption and Purchase Intention towards Organic Products.” MSc Thesis. Wageningen University.
Cameron, Deborah. 2001. Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El-Dali, Hosni. 2019. “The Language of Consumer Advertising: Linguistic and Psychological Perspectives.” Studies in Linguistics and Literature 3 (2): 95–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fogg, BJ. 2002. “Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do.” Ubiquity (December). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Funk, M. 2020. “YouTube Thumbnails: The Best Practice Guide.” Tubics, January. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 January 2023).
Fuertes-Olivera, Pedro, Marisol Velasco-Sacristán, Ascensión Arribas-Bano and Eva Samaniego Fernández. 2001. “Persuasion and Advertising English: Metadiscourse in Slogans and Headlines.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1291–1307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geissler, Gary, George Zinkhan, and Richard Watson. 2006. “The Influence of Home Page Complexity on Consumer Attention, Attitudes, and Purchase Intent.” Journal of Advertising 35 (2): 69–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Maga. 2018. “Metadiscourse in Advertising: Persuasion in Online Advertisements of Makeup Brands”. MA Thesis. Linnaeus University.
Halliday, Michael. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamari, Juho, Jonna Koivisto, and Tuomas Pakkanen. 2014. “Do Persuasive Technologies Persuade? A Review of Empirical Studies.” In Persuasive Technology: 9th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2014, Padua, Italy, May 21–23, 2014. Proceedings 91, 118–136. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Bodmin: MPG Books Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. 2009. “An Introduction to Multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. by Carey Jewitt, 14–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahn, Barbara. 2017. “Using Visual Design to Improve Customer Perceptions of Online Assortments.” Journal of Retailing 93 (1): 29–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koh, Byungwan, and Fuquan Cui. 2022. “An Exploration of the Relation Between the Visual Attributes of Thumbnails and the View-Through of Videos: The Case of Branded Video Content.” Available at: [URL] (accessed 10 February 2023).
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael, Kimberly Whitler, and JoAndrea Hoegg. 2013. “Customer Relationship Stage and the Use of Picture-dominant Versus Text-dominant Advertising: A Field Study”. Journal of Retailing 89 (3): 263–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Qiwei. 2019. “Clickbait and Emotional Language in False News.” [URL] (accessed 12 October 2023).
Jonathan, Luffarelli, Mudra Mukesh, and Mahmood Ammara. 2019. “Let the Logo do the Talking: The Influence of Logo Descriptiveness on Brand Equity.” Journal of Marketing Research 56 (5): 862–878. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Ashesh, and Seung Lee. 2016. “Scarcity Appeals in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Expectation of Scarcity.” Journal of Advertising 45 (2): 256–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nus, Miriam. 1999. “‘Can We Count on Your Bookings of Potatoes to Madeira?’ Corporate Context and Discourse Practices in Direct Sales Letters.” In Writing Business: Genre, Media and Discourse, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Catherine Nickerson, 181–206. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Neill, Megan. 2018. “State of Social Video: Marketer Trends [Infographic].” Animoto Blog, 23 October. Available at: [URL] (accessed 18 May 2022).
Rosen, Ruth, Li Yuanzhen, and Lisa Nakano. 2007. “Measuring Visual Clutter.” Journal of Visualization 7 (2): 171.1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, Donghyuk, Shu He, Gene Lee, Andrew Whimston, Suleyman Cetintas, and Kuang-Chih Lee. 2020. “Enhancing Social Media Analysis with Visual Data Analytics: A Deep Learning Approach.” MIS Quarterly 44 (4): 1459–1492. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Herbert. 1986. Persuasion: Understanding, Practice, and Analysis. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Yale, Miriam Redi, Jordi Vallmitjana, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2016. “To Click or Not to Click: Automatic Selection of Beautiful Thumbnails from Videos.” In CIKM ’16: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 659–668. Association for Computing Machinery. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2015. “Multimodality.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn, ed. by Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, 447–465. Blackwell: Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodward, Gary, and Robert Denton. 2013. Persuasion and Influence in American Life. Waveland Press: Illinois.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue