Cover not available

Article In: Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles

Pragmatic-rhetorical strategies employed by prophet mohammad in hadiths on faith

ORCiD logo with link | Jordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbid
 | Yarmouk UniversityIrbid | Al-Zaytoonah University of JordanAmman
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study examines the rhetorical strategies and pragmatic functions employed by Prophet Mohammad in Hadiths on faith. The data are a substantial portion of Hadiths in Arabic taken from the second chapter (bāb al-imān ‘the book of faith’) in Sahih Al-Bukhāri. The analysis draws insights from Aristotle’s three persuasive appeals — logos, pathos and ethos, Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar Speech Act Theory and Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar action-theoretic societal pragmatics known as the theory of Pragmatic Acts. Findings reveal that Prophet Mohammad persuades by employing classification, cause and effect, metaphor, analogy and pun, and sharing personal experience. Compelling arguments are developed through the speaker’s appeal to the audience’s rational thinking, emotional attitudes, and moral principles. These persuasive elements are a suitable foundation for accomplishing pragmatic acts such as reiterating, encouraging, guiding, warning, inspiring and exhorting.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Islamic Hadith Genre
  • 3.Theoretical framework
    • 3.1Rhetorical component
    • 3.2Pragmatic component
  • 4.Research on persuasion in religious discourse
  • 5.Data collection
  • 6.Data presentation and analysis
    • 6.1Use of classification
    • 6.2Use of cause and effect
    • 6.3Use of metaphor
    • 6.4Use of analogy and pun
    • 6.5Sharing personal experience
  • 7.Discussion and conclusion
    • 7.1Aristotelian appeal
    • 7.2Speech Act Theory and the theory of Pragmatic Acts
  • Acknowledgement
  • Note
  • References
References (41)
References
Abu Rumman, Ronza. 2019. Persuasive Strategies in Arabic Religious Discourse: Evidence from the Friday sermons of Mohammad Rateb Al-Nabulsi. International Journal of Linguistics 11(6): 248–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adam, Martin. 2017. Persuasion in Religious Discourse: Enhancing Credibility in Sermon Titles and Openings. Discourse and Interaction 10(2): 5–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akinwotu, Samuel A. 2021. A Pragma-rhetorical Study of Selected Pentecostal Sermons in Nigeria. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies 331: 4–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alamgir, Muhammad, Noureen Waqar and Ijaz ul haq. 2023. Exploration of Persuasive Strategies in the Religious Speeches of Contemporary Islamic Scholars, PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 20(2): 1838–1853.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
‘Alī, Abdulla Yūsuf. 2022. The Holy Qur’an Translation, [URL], last accessed June 6, 2026.
Al-Islam.org. n.d. The Science of Hadith 12/27 — The Four Shia Books and Other Shi’ah Hadith Books. [URL], last accessed June 8, 2026
Al-Nasher, Amal A. 2010. Persuasion Strategies in Religious Discourse with Reference to Deedat’s ‘The Choice: Islam and Christianity’. MA Thesis, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Alsharif, Bilal, Razan Khasawneh, and Musa Alzghoul. 2026. Strategies of Rendering Metaphor from Arabic into English: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Matecat. World Journal of English Language 16(1): 1–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2007. Rhetoric, translated by W. Rhys Roberts. Garden City, N.Y.: Dover Publications. (Original work written in 4th century BCE)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vigay K. 1999. ‘Integrating Products, Processes, and Participants in Professional Writing.’ In Writing: Texts, Processes, and Practices, ed. by Chris N. Candlin and Ken Hyland, 21–39. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vigay K. and Stephen Bremner (eds). 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Professional Communication. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Jonathan A. C. 2009. Hadith: Muhammad’s Legacy in the Medieval and Modern World. London: One World.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campo, Juan E. 2009. ‘Hadith.’ In Encyclopedia of Islam, 278–280. New York, N. Y.: Infobase.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dillard, James Price and Michael Pfau eds. 2002. The Persuasion Handbook. Developments in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furley, David J. and Alexander Nehamas eds. 1994. Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena and Tuija Virtanen eds. 2005. Persuasion across Genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holíčková, Zuzana. 2019. Persuasive Strategies in Religious Discourse: A Contrastive Analysis of Scripted Sermons. MA Thesis, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Retrieved at
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Stance and engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2013. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locke, Terry. 2004. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lunsford, Andrea A., Kirt H. Wilson, and Rosa A. Eberly eds. 2009. The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. “Pragmatic acts”. In: Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (Second Edition), ed. by Keith Brown, Volume 101, 5–12. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pettegree, Andrew. 2005. Reformation and the Culture of Persuasion. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rashid, Bushra M. 2022. Persuasive Arguments in Religious Texts: A Discourse Analysis Study. 3rd International Congress of Humanities and Educational Research, Istanbul, Turkey, [URL]
Sādia, Haleema and Sarwet Rasul. 2015. Pathos as a Persuasive Technique in the Holy Qur’an: an analysis of Surah Al-Zumar. Kashmir Journal of Language Research 18(2): 176–195.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sahih Al-Bukhari. [URL], last accessed June 7, 2026
Sallomi, Azhar H. and Dheyā K. Nayel. 2017. A Study of Persuasive Techniques in English and Arabic Religious Sermons: A Comparative Study. Journal Dawat 4(13): 8–23Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sardar, Ziauddin. 1979. The Future of Muslim Civilisation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sayeed, Asma. 2022. “Hadith”. Encyclopedia Britannica. [URL], last accessed 5 June 2026.
Sharaf Eldin, Ahmad A. 2014. Critical Discourse Analysis of Religious Sermons in Egypt: A Case Study of Amr Khalid’s Sermons. International Education Studies 7 (11): 68–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharif, Azadeh and Faiz S. Abdullah. 2014. Persuasive Discourse in Ceremonial Speeches of Mother Teresa: A critical review. International Journal of Education and Research 21: 319–332Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Lijiang and Elisabeth Bigsby. 2013. The Effects of Message Features Content, Structure, and Style. In The Sage Book of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, ed. by James P. Dillard and Lijiang Shen, 20–35. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thagard, Paul. 2005. The Emotional Coherence of Religion, Journal of Cognition and Culture 5(1–2): 58–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van De Wege, Melissa. 2013. Arabic Rhetoric: Main idea, Development, Parallelism, and Word Repetition. Unpublished MA thesis, Eastern Washington University, Cheney, Wash.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2003. The Discourse-Knowledge Interface. In Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Gilbert Weiss and Ruth Wodak, 85–109. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija and Helena Halmari. 2005. Persuasion Across Genres: Emerging Perspectives. In Persuasion Across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari and Tuija Virtanen, 1–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wróbel, Szymon. 2015. Logos, Ethos, Pathos. Classical Rhetoric Revisited. Polish Sociological Review 1911: 401–422Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue