Cover not available

Article In: Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles

Speech acts in institutional communication on fire prevention

Analysis of the linguistic landscape in the Qinling Mountains, China

ORCiD logo with link | Tsinghua University
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper investigates how institutional discourse on “fire prevention” is communicated through speech acts in the linguistic landscape of the Qinling Mountains, China. The Chinese government has issued multiple laws and regulations on forest fire prevention, and signs making up the linguistic landscape have become a crucial medium for publicizing legal norms and encouraging public compliance. Drawing on linguistic landscape data and utilizing Searle’s taxonomy of illocutionary speech acts, this paper analyzes the pragmatic functions of public signage produced by various administrative bodies. The results show that “fire prevention” signs primarily perform representatives, directives, and mixed speech acts. The grassroots institutions rely on directives for immediate behavioral control, whereas higher-level authorities use representatives and mixed speech acts to legitimize policies and promote ecological awareness. These signs function as a material extension of state authority, transforming legal texts into visible, spatially anchored slogans that mediate institutional governance in the natural environment.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Speech act theory and its application to LL
  • 3.The Qinling mountains and fire prevention
  • 4.Data collection: The linguistic landscape in the qinling mountains
  • 5.Data analysis
    • 5.1Example (1): Representative sign
    • 5.2Example (2): Representative sign
    • 5.3Example (3): Directive sign
    • 5.4Example (4): Directive sign
    • 5.5Example (5): Mixed speech acts sign
    • 5.6Example (6): Mixed speech acts sign
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
References (35)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Backhaus, Peter. 2006. Linguistic landscapes: A comparative study of urban multilingualism in Tokyo. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, and Ico Maly. 2015. “Ethnographic linguistic landscape analysis and social change: A case study.” In Language and Superdiversity, ed. by Karel Arnaut, Jan Blommaert, Ben Rampton and Massimiliano Spotti, 207–227. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boxer, Diana. 2002. “Nagging: The familial conflict arena.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (1): 49–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiang, Shiao-Yun. 2011. “Pursuing a response in office hour interactions between US college students and international teaching assistants.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3316–3330. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooren, François. 2008. “Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demaj, Uranela, and Mieke Vandenbroucke. 2024. “The geosemiotics of ethno-political graffiti in Kosovo: polyphony, emplacement and heteroglossia.” Social Semiotics 34 (5): 937–962. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dong, Jie. 2020. “Space, signs, and legitimate workers’ identities: An ethnography of a Beijing ‘urban village’.” Social Semiotics 30 (2): 151–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “‘Labor is the most glorious’: Chronotopic linguistic landscaping and the making of working class identities.” Language & Communication 801: 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. “Toward an ethnographic materialist semiotics: spatial scope, indexicality, and chronotope in a Chinese academic institution: In memory of Jan Blommaert.” Chinese Semiotic Studies 20 (1): 19–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farhan, Fachri Bintang, Ike Revita, and Oktavianus Oktavianus. 2024. “Persuasive languages on political billboard of the 2024 Indonesian General Election in Padang City West Sumatra, Indonesia.” Cogent Arts & Humanities 11 (1): 2325679. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferenčík, Milan. 2018. “Im/politeness on the move: a study of regulatory discourse practices in Slovakia’s centre of tourism.” Journal of Pragmatics 1341: 183–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Yanmei. 2021. “Situated impoliteness revisited: Blunt anti-epidemic slogans and conflicting comments during the coronavirus outbreak in China.” Journal of Pragmatics 1781: 31–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ike, Saya, and Yaeko Hori. 2023. “COVID-19 discourse in linguistic landscape: Linguistic and semiotic analysis of directive signs.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 43 (4): 375–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karmazin, Aleš. 2020. “Slogans as an organizational feature of Chinese politics.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 25 (3): 411–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacsina, Nadine, and Aiden Yeh. 2022. “Keep social distance: The linguistic landscape of the major malls in Jeddah amid the COVID-19 pandemic.” Topics in Linguistics 23 (1): 39–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landry, Rodrigue, and Richard Y. Bourhis. 1997. “Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16 (1): 23–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, Xing. 1999. “An ideological/cultural analysis of political slogans in communist China.” Discourse & Society 10 (4): 487–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ma, Ben, Zhen Cai, Jie Zheng, and Yali Wen. 2019. “Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality — A case study of nature reserves in Qinling, China.” World Development 1151: 236–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrow, Phillip R. 2015. “Directives in Japanese: Evidence from signs.” World Englishes 34 (1): 78–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2002. “Speech acts in context.” Language & Communication 22 (4): 421–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Suzie Wong Scollon. 2003. Discourses in place: Language in the material world. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976. “A classification of illocutionary acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, Jiaxin, Chao Zhang, and Feng Jiang. 2015. “Does red undermine individuals’ intellectual performance? A test in China.” International Journal of Psychology 50 (1): 81–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Jianlin, and James Paul Gee. 2020. “Slogans with Chinese characteristics: The political functions of a discourse form.” Discourse & Society 31 (2): 201–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svennevig, Jan. 2021. “How to do things with signs. The formulation of directives on signs in public spaces.” Journal of Pragmatics 1751: 165–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandenbroucke, Mieke, and Fien De Malsche. 2023. “Solidarity and support in Belgian residential linguistic landscapes during the Covid-19 outbreak.” Pragmatics and Society 14 (2): 210–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, Ming-chung. 2005. “Sociolinguistic competence in the complimenting act of native Chinese and American English speakers: A mirror of cultural value.” Language and Speech 48 (1): 91–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeng, Xueyan, Jinming Yang, and Shimei Li [曾雪艳, 杨金明, 李士美]. 2021. “Spatial and Temporal Pattern of Forest Fires in China from 2003 to 2018 [2003–2018年中国森林火灾时空分布格局研究]. Forest Inventory and Planning/林业调查规划 46 (2): 53–58, 168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Mengli, and Tianwei Zhang. 2025. “From Stance to Identity within Signs: Noncommercial Slogans in China.” Signs and Society 13(2): 199–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Yuke, Xuehua Liu, Zixin Lü, Xiangyu Zhao, Xingzhong Yang, Xiaodong Jia, Wanlong Sun, Xiangbo He, Baishuo He, and Qiong Cai. 2019. “Animal diversity responding to different forest restoration schemes in the Qinling Mountains, China.” Ecological Engineering 1361: 23–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhong, Maohua, Weicheng Fan, Tiemin Liu, and Peide Li. 2003. “Statistical analysis on current status of China forest fire safety.” Fire Safety Journal 38 (3): 257–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, Lingguo [周灵国]. 2017. Qinling giant panda: The fourth panda survey in Shaanxi Province [秦岭大熊猫:陕西省第四次大熊猫调查报告]. Xi’an: Shaanxi Science and Technology Press/陕西省科学技术出版社.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue