In:English in Kuwait: Development, status and usage
Mohammad A.N. Alenezi
[Varieties of English Around the World G73] 2026
► pp. ix–xii
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
List of tables
Table 1.1Extra- and intra-territorial forces
(adapted from Buschfeld & Kautzsch, 2017)
(adapted from Buschfeld & Kautzsch, 2017)
Table 2.1Overview of interviewees
Table 2.2Thematic categorisation and aims of interview questions
Table 2.3Demographic breakdown of contributors
to KENC2023 (N = 564)
to KENC2023 (N = 564)
Table 2.4Participants in situated recordings sourced
via observations
via observations
Table 2.5Participants in situated recordings sourced via online posts
Table 2.6Breakdown of mediated data subcorpora
Table 2.7Referencing scheme for the written component
of KENC2023
of KENC2023
Table 2.8Referencing scheme for the spoken component
of KENC2023
of KENC2023
Table 2.9Pattern-driven approach to frequency analysis
Table 3.1Adjectival collocates of node words (LogDice)
Table 3.2General assessments of English in Kuwait
Table 3.3Positive assessments and evaluations of English
Table 3.4Negative assessments and evaluations of English
Table 3.5Social groups and English
Table 4.1Reference formant values of RP monophthongs
(adapted from Hawkins & Midgley, 2005: 195)
(adapted from Hawkins & Midgley, 2005: 195)
Table 4.2Selected verb-phrase features in English in Kuwait (adapted from
Alotaibi, 2016b: 37–8)
Table 5.1High-frequency English-based discourse-pragmatic markers (DPMs) per
million words (pmw)
Table 5.2Medium-frequency English-based discourse-pragmatic markers (DPMs) per
million words (pmw)
Table 5.3Arabic-based discourse-pragmatic markers (DPMs)
per million words (pmw)
per million words (pmw)
Table 6.1Frequencies (pmw) of particle verbs across corpora
Table 6.2Particle verbs vs simple verbs (pmw) across corpora
Table 6.3Prenomial vs postnomial particle placement (pmw)
in KENC2023
in KENC2023
Table 6.4Formal productivity of count, help and
sign
Table 6.5Canonical uses of would in British English
(adapted from Deuber et al., 2012: 78)
(adapted from Deuber et al., 2012: 78)
Table 6.6Distribution of random sample of would in KENC2023
across semantic domains
Table 6.7Distribution of random sample of will in KENC2023 across
semantic domains
Table 6.8Frequency-table input format for distinctive collexeme analysis (Gries
& Stefanowitsch, 2004)
Table 6.9Collexemes distinguishing between going to and
will
in KENC2023
in KENC2023
Table 6.10Collexemes distinguishing between going to and
will
in BNC2014
in BNC2014
Table 6.11Collexemes distinguishing between going to and
will
in OANC
in OANC
Table 6.12Abstract-level vector space modelling (VSM) table
Table 6.13Distinctive collexemes of quite + ADJ
in KENC2023
vs BNC2014
vs BNC2014
Table 6.14Distinctive collexemes of quite + ADJ
in KENC2023
vs OANC
vs OANC
Table 6.15Distinctive collexemes of attributive and predicative adjectival
constructions in KENC2023
Table 6.16Distinctive collexemes of attributive and predicative adjectival
constructions in BNC2014
Table 6.17Distinctive collexemes of attributive and predicative adjectival
constructions in OANC
Table 7.1English in Kuwait from a historical perspective
Table 7.2English in Kuwait from a sociolinguistic perspective
Table 7.3Kuwaiti English from a linguistic perspective
