Cover not available

In:Letters as Loot: A sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch
Gijsbert Rutten and Marijke J. van der Wal
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 2] 2014
► pp. 409–424

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

References

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 3.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.2.refs
Aalberse, Suzanne. 2009. Inflectional economy and politeness: Morphology-internal and morphology-external factors in the loss of second person marking in Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2008. The pragmatics of and-conjunctives in Middle English medical recipes: A relevance theory description. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9. 171–199.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1750. Le nouveau et parfait secretaire en hollandois et francois / De nieuwe volmaakte Hollandsche en Fransche secretaris. 2nd ed. Rotterdam: Voor rekening van de Compagnie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1614. Materi-boecxken, oft voorschriften / seer bequaem voor die joncheyt / om wel te leeren lesen / schryven / ende een aenporringhe tot alle deuchden. Utrecht: Harman Hendricks van Borculo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1686. Matery-boeksken, ofte voor-schriften / seer bequaem voor de jonckheydt / om wel te leeren leesen / schryven / ende een opweckinge tot deughden. Amsterdam: Gijsbert de Groot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1770. Nieuwe handleiding tot de manier van brieven schryven. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: S.J. Baalde.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ANS = Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. [URL]
Auer, Peter. 2002. Schreiben in der Hypotaxe – Sprechen in der Parataxe?: Kritische Bemerkungen zu einem Gemeinplatz. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 39. 131–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31. 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, Frances. 1973a. Epistolary conventions in the Clift family correspondence. English Studies 54. 9–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973b. Epistolary conventions in the Clift family correspondence (Concluded). English Studies 54. 129–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. The effect of exposure to Standard English: The language of William Clift. In Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600–1800, 285–313. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Heaving this importunity: The survival of opening formulas in letters in the eighteenth and nineteenth Centuries. Historical Sociolinguistics & Sociohistorical Linguistics 4. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bannet, Eve Tavor. 2005. Empire of letters: Letter manuals and transatlantic correspondence, 1688–1820. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbiers, S. et al. 2006. Dynamische Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (Dyna­SAND). Amsterdam, Meertens Instituut. URL: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel. 2010. Epistolary presentation rituals: Face-work, politeness, and ritual display in early modern Dutch letter-writing. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (Im)politenes, 37–85. Bern etc.: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beal, Joan. C. 2004. English in modern times: 1700–1945. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaman, Karen. 1984. Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse, 45–80. Norwood, NJ: ABLEX Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morton H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman & Tom Schoenemann. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59. 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Belle, Jan. 1748. Korte wegwyzer, ter spel- spraak- en dichtkunden. Haarlem: Izaakvan der Vinne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van den Berg, Willem. 1978. Briefreflectie in briefinstructie. Documentatieblad werkgroep Achttiende Eeuw 1978. 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander. 2005. Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston letters (1421–1503). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The Uniformitarian Principle and the risk of anachronisms in language and social history. In Hernández-Campoy & Conde-Silvestre(eds.), 80–98.
Berteloot, Amand. 1983. Bijdrage tot een klankatlas van het dertiende-eeuwse Middelnederlands. 2 vols.Ghent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Van du naar ghi: Waarom het pronomen du uit het Nederlands ver­dween. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 119. 204–217.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Dimensions of variation among 18th-century registers. In: H.-J. Diller & M. Görlach (eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genres, 89–109. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: a history of three genres. Language 65. 487–517.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1990. Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blaak, Jeroen. 2009. Literacy in everyday life: Reading and writing in Early Modern Dutch diaries. Leiden & Boston: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boonstra, O.W.A. 1993. De waardij van eene vroege opleiding: Een onderzoek naar de implicaties van het alfabetisme op het leven van inwoners van Eindhoven en omliggende gemeenten, 1800–1920. Wageningen: Afdeling Agrarische Geschiedenis, Landbouw Universiteit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1995. The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Booy, E.P. 1977. De weldaet der scholen: Het plattelandsonderwijs in de provincie Utrecht van 1580 tot het begin der 19de eeuw. Bilthoven: Stichtse Historische Reeks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1980. Kweekhoven der wijsheid: Basis- en vervolgonderwijs in de steden van de provincie Utrecht van 1580 tot het begin der 19de eeuw. Zutphen: Walburg Pers & Stichtse Historische Reeks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boutkan, Dirk & Maarten Kossmann. 1998. Over sjwa-apocope in het Nederlands. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 114. 164–171.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyce Hendriks, Jennifer. 1998. Immigration and linguistic change: A socio-historical linguistic study on the effect of German and Southern Dutch immigration on the development of the Northern Dutch vernacular in 16th/17th-century Holland. Unpublished dissertation. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyce, Jennifer & Robert Howell. 1996. Rewriting the history of Dutch: On the use of social history to explain linguistic change. In William Z. Shetter & Inger Van der Cruysse (eds.), Contemporary explorations in the culture of the Low Countries, 25–38. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyce Hendriks, Jennifer & Robert B. Howell. 2000. On the use and abuse of social history in the history of the Dutch language. In Thomas F. Shannon & Johan P. Snapper (eds.), The Berkeley conference on Dutch linguistics 1997, 253–277. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brant, Clare. 2006. Eighteenth-century letters and British culture. Houndmills & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braunius, S.W.P.C. 1964. Van schrijver tot officier van administratie: 1597–1844. Marineblad 73. 345–357.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Bree, Cor. 1987. Historische grammatica van het Nederlands. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breton, N. 1645. Nederduytsen briefdragher. Amsterdam: Jan van Hilten.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephan C. Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In: Esther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness, 60–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruijn, Jaap R. 2008. Schippers van de VOC in de achttiende eeuw aan de wal en op zee. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: De Bataafsche Leeuw.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language 82. 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Sandra Thompson. 2000. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society 23. 65–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1985. Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance & Angela Hildyard (eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing, 105–123. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Linking intonation units in spoken English. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 1–27. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de la Chambre, Pierre. 1648. Verscheyden brieven, bequaem in de scholen te ghebruycken … Plusjeurs lettres missives, a l’usage des ecoles. Haarlem: Isaacvan Wesbusch.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Commandeur, P.N.M. 1988. Het ontstaan van het modern Amsterdams: Over een verband tussen maatschappelijke ontwikkeling en taalontwikkeling. Taal & Tongval 40.159–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corrigan, Roberta, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen M. Wheatley (eds.). 2009. Formulaic language. Volume 1: Distribution and historical change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian. 1979. On the sociolinguistic relevance of routine formulae. Journal of Pragmatics 3. 239–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 1981a. Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague, Paris & New York: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981b. Introduction: Conversational routine. In: Coulmas 1981a: 1–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, Anthony Paul (ed.). 1998. Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crowley, Tony. 1996. Language in history: Theories and texts. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2010. Historical (Im)politeness. Bern etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues: spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daan, Jo. 1982. Solidariteit en distantie in de zeventiende eeuw: De aanspreekpronomina in de brieven. In Piet Van De Craen & Roland Willemyns (eds.), Sociolinguïstiek en ideologie, 113–134. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, Norman. 1965. The Litera Troili and English letters. The Review of English Studies. New series 16. 233–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Anne Catherine Simon. 2009. On identifying basic discourse units in speech: theoretical and empirical issues. Discours 4. See [URL].
Dibbets, Geert. 1985. Twe-spraack vande Nederduitsche letterkunst (1584). Ingeleid, geïnterpreteerd, van kommentaar voorzien en uitgegeven. Assen & Maastricht: van Gorcum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Anthoni Smyters over de spelling van het Nederlands (Ao 1613). Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 102. 103–121.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. De woordsoorten in de Nederlandse triviumgrammatica. Amsterdam & Münster: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU & Nodus Publikationen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina. 2003. “As this leaves me at present” – Formulaic usage, politeness, and social proximity in nineteenth-century Scottish emigrants’ letters. In Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000), 13–29. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DynaSAND, see Barbiers et al. 2006.
Elmentaler, Michael. 2000. Zur Koexistenz graphematischer Systeme in der spätmittelalterlichen Stadt. In Michael Elmentaler (ed.), Regionalsprachen, Stadtsprachen und Institutionssprachen im historischen Prozess, 53–72. Vienna: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Der Erkenntniswert der schreibsprachlichen Variation für die Sprachgeschichte: Überlegungen zu den Ergebnissen eines Duisburger Graphematikprojektes. Rheinische Vierteljahrsblätter 65. 290–314.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Struktur und Wandel vormoderner Schreibsprachen. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2005. Sprachgeschichte von unten. Untersuchungen zum geschriebenen Alltagsdeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. A twofold view ‘from below’: new perspectives on language histories and language historiographies. In Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000), 3–9. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 156–169. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. Between linguistic creativity and formulaic restriction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century lower class writers’ private letters. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 45–64. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan & Nils Langer. 2012. Jespersen’s cycle and the history of German negation: Challenges from a sociolinguistic perspective. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113. 275–292.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairman, Tony. 2007. “Lower-order” letters, schooling and the English language, 1795 to 1834. In Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic Language Histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000), 31–43. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Letters in mechanically-schooled language: Theories and ideologies. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 205–227. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falkenberg, Gabriel. 2001. Lexical sensitivity in negative polarity verbs. In Jack Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann, Victor Sánchez-Valencia & Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items, 79–97. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Christian. 2000. Mundartreflexe in der frühneuzeitlichen Schreibsprache der Stadt Soest. In Michael Elmentaler (ed.), Regionalsprachen, Stadtsprachen und Institutionssprachen im historischen Prozess, 101–115. Vienna: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frijhoff, Willem & Marijke Spies. 1999. 1650. Bevochten eendracht. The Hague: Sdu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaspar, R.J.G.A.A. 2003. De Doesburgse brievencollectie: Aspecten van het leven in de Repu­bliek der Verenigde Nederlanden tegen het einde van de achttiende eeuw. Bijdragen en mededelingen Gelre: Historisch Jaarboek van Gelderland XCIV. 47–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelder, Roelof. 2006. Verslag van een inventariserend onderzoek naar Nederlandse brieven in het archief van het High Court of Admiralty in The National Archives in Kew, Groot-Brittannië. The Hague: Koninklijke Bibliotheek.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 2000. The dependence locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain, 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gledhill, John Michael. 1973. Aspects of the development of Dutch consonantal spelling. S.l.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goeman, A.C.M. 1999. T-deletie in Nederlandse dialecten: kwantitatieve analyse van structurele, ruimtelijke en temporele variatie. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goossens, J., J. Taeldeman & G. Verleyen. 2000. Fonologische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten. Deel II: De Westgermaanse korte vocalen in open lettergreep. Deel III: De Westgermaanse lange vocalen en diftongen. Ghent: KANTL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goss, Emily L. 2002. Negotiated language change in Early Modern Holland: Immigration and linguistic variation in The Hague (1600–1670). Unpublished dissertation. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goss, Emily L. & Robert B. Howell. 2006. Social and structural factors in the development of Dutch urban dialects in the early modern period. In Thomas Craven (ed.), Variation and reconstruction, 59–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. 1987. The legacies of literacy: Continuities and contradictions in western culture and society. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane & Fanny Meunier. 2008. Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greidanus, Johanna. 1926. Beginselen en ontwikkeling van de interpunctie, in ’t biezonder in de Nederlanden. Zeist: Vonk & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Haan, Ger J. & Fred Weerman. 1984. Taaltypologie, taalverandering en mogelijke grammatica’s: het Middelnederlandse “en”. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 100. 161–190.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hakvoord, Barend, Gemeene zend-brieven, zoo die in de Duitse scholen van Nederland worden geleert. Dordrecht[ca. 1750]: Hendrik Walpot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, Gemeene zend-brieven, zo die in de Duitsche scholen van Nederland worden geleerd. Deventer, 1794: J.H. de Lange.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heinsius, Jacobus. 1897. Klank- en buigingsleer van de taal des Statenbijbels. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Helten, W.L. 1881. Vondel’s taal: Een proeve van onderzoek naar de grammatica van het Ne­derlandsch der zeventiende eeuw. Vormleer. Rotterdam: Petri.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds). 2012. The handbook of historical sociolinguistics. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Natalie Schilling. 2012. The application of the quantitative paradigm to historical sociolinguistics: Problems with the generalizability principle. In Hernández-Campoy & Conde-Silvestre (eds.), 63–79.
Höchli, Stefan. 1981. Zur Geschichte der Interpunktion im Deutschen. Berlijn & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 1994. On the grammaticalization of negative polarity items. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 20. 273–282.
Hoeksema, Jacob. 1997. Negation and negative concord in Middle Dutch. In Danielle Forget, Paul Hirschbühler, France Martineau & María-Luisa Rivero (eds), Negation and polarity: Syntax and semantics, 139–156. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hol, Adriana R. 1941. Het prefix in het verleden deelwoord. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsche Taal- en Letterkunde 60. 249–293.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Horst, Joop. 1988. Over relatief dat en wat . De nieuwe taalgids 81. 194–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Voornaamwoordelijke bijwoorden in 16de-eeuws Nederlands. Spektator 22. 290–308.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis. 2 vols. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Horst, Joop & Marijke van der Wal. 1979. Negatieverschijnselen en woordvolgorde in de geschiedenis van het Nederlands. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 95. 6–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Horst, J.M.& R. Storm. 1991. Over de geschiedenis van het betrekkelijk voornaamwoordelijk bijwoord. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 107. 105–119.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howell, Robert B. 2006. Immigration and koineisation: The formation of early modern Dutch urban vernaculars. Transactions of the Philological Society 104. 207–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1999. Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3. 272–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobi, Heyman. 1645. Ghemeyne zeyndt-brieven / profijtelijck voor de ouders / meesters ende kinderen / om te leeren brieven dichten / wel te leven / ende ordentelijck te schrijven. Hoorn: Isaac Willemsz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1656. Gemeene zeyndt-brieven / profijtelijck voor de ouders / meesters ende kinderen / om te leeren brieven dichten / wel lesen / ende ordentlijck te schrijven. Arnhem: Jan Jacobsz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1728. Ghemeyne sendbrieven: Seer profijtigh voor d’ouders, meesters ende kinderen, om te lesen, brieven dichten, en ordentelijck te schrijven. Antwerpen: Alexander Josephus Everaerts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1792. Gemene zend-brieven: Zeer voordeelig voor de ouders, meesters ende kinderen, om te leeren brieven dichten, ende ordentelyk schryven. Venlo: Wed. Hubert Bontamps.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Bart & Marijke van der Wal. To appear. The discovery, nature, and implications of a Papiamentu text fragment from 1783. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages.
Joseph, John E. 1987. Eloquence and power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. New York: Blackwell/ London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2003. Diachronic perspectives on address term systems: Introduction. In Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, 1–25. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Jonathan Culpeper. 2010. Historical (Im)politeness: An introduction. In: Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár, Historical (Im)politeness, 9–36. Bern etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ten Kate, Lambert. 1723. Aenleiding tot de kennisse van het verhevene deel der Nederduitse sprake. 2 vols. Reprint and introduction by Jan Noordegraaf & Marijke van der Wal. Alphen aan den Rijn 2001: Canaletto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keijzer, Merel. 2007. Last in first out? An investigation of the regression hypothesis in Dutch emigrants in Anglophone Canada. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 2002. Koineization and accommodation. In Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 669–702. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kloek, Joost & Wijnand Mijnhardt. 2001. 1800. Blauwdrukken voor een samenleving. The Hague: Sdu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kloeke, Gesinus G. 1933. De Noordnederlandsche tegenstelling westoost-zuid weerspiegeld in de a-woorden: Een dialectgeographische excursie om de Zuiderzee. [Part 1]. Nieuwe Taalgids 27. 241–256.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1934. De Noordnederlandsche tegenstelling westoost-zuid weerspiegeld in de a-woorden: Een dialectgeographische excursie om de Zuiderzee. [Part 2]. Nieuwe Taalgids 28. 64–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1934–1935). De Amsterdamsche volkstaal voorheen en thans. Mededeelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Letterkunde 77–79-A. 1–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgebrauch. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36. 15–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koelmans, L. 1959. Teken en klank bij Michiel de Ruyter. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Het Nederlands van Michiel de Ruyter. Morfologie, woordvorming, syntaxis. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kók, A.L. 1649. Ont-werp der Neder-duitsche letter-konst. Amsterdam: Johannes Troost.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koning, Paula. 1997. Hooft en Mostart: Een Nederduitse secretaris voor P.C. Hooft. In Jeroen Jansen (ed.), Omnibus idem: Opstellen over P.C. Hooft ter gelegenheid van zijn driehonderdvijftigste sterfdag, 83–100. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kooijmans, Luuc. 1997. Vriendschap en de kunst van het overleven in de zeventiende en achttiende eeuw. Amsterdam: Bakker.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koolenkamp, Willem. 1740. Send-brieven, dienstig voor de Jeugt. Utrecht: J.V. Poolsum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiper, Koenraad. 2009. Formulaic genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuiper, Koenraad & Douglas Haggo. 1984. Livestock auctioneers, oral poetry, and ordinary language. Language in Society 13. 205–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kusters, Wouter. 2003. Linguistic complexity: The influence of social change on verbal inflection. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuijpers, Erika. 1997. Lezen en schrijven: Onderzoek naar het alfabetiseringsniveau in zeventiende-eeuws Amsterdam. Tijdschrift voor Sociale Geschiedenis 23. 490–522.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1. Internal Factors. Oxford UK & Cambridge USA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laitinen, Lea & Taru Nordlund. 2012. Performing identities and interaction through epistolary formulae. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 65–88. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume II. 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Phonology and morphology. In: Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume III. 1476–1776, 56–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1984. Der Relativsatz: Typologie seiner Strukturen, Theorie seiner Funktionen, Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lennard, John. 1995. Punctuation: And – “Pragmatics”. In: Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English, 65–98. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leupenius, Petrus. 1653. Aanmerkingen op de Neederduitsche taale. Amsterdam: Donker.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leuvensteijn, Arjan van. 2000a. Aanspreekvormen in de Sara Burgerhart: Een inventarisatie. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde116. 121–131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. Over Uw Edele, Uwé en Juffrouw: Zijdelingse aanspreking in de Sara Burgerhart . Voortgang, jaarboek voor de neerlandistiek 19. 87–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Loey, Adolphe. 1980. Middelnederlandse spraakkunst.I. Vormleer. 9th ed. Groningen & Jakarta: Wolters / Antwerp: De Sikkel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1965. Middelnederlandse spraakkunst. II. Klankleer. 4th ed. Groningen: Wolters/ Antwerp: De Sikkel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loock, Rudy. 2007. Appositive relative clauses and their functions in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 336–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Loon, Jozef. 1986. Historische fonologie van het Nederlands. Leuven & Amersfoort: Acco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MAND = Morfologische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten. Vol. I. Ed. by Georges de Schutter, Boudewijn van den Berg, Ton Goeman & Thera de Jong. Amsterdam 2005: Amsterdam University Press.
MAND = Morfologische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten. Vol. II. Ed. by Ton Goeman, Marc van Oostendorp, Pieter van Reenen, Oele Koornwinder, Boudewijn van den Berg & Anke van Reenen. Amsterdam 2008: Amsterdam University Press.
Martineau, France. 2007. Variation in Canadian French usage from the 18th to the 19th century. Multilingua 26. 203–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Written documents: What they tell us about linguistic usage. In Ma­rijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten, Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 129–147. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marynissen, Ann. 2009. Taalverandering tussen evolutie en normering: De e-apocope als breuklijn tussen het Nederlands en het Duits. Nederlandse Taalkunde 14. 233–254.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, A.J. 1995. Defining politeness: universality in appropriateness. Language Sciences 17. 345–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Métayer, Christine. 2000. Au tombeau des secrets: les écrivains publics du Paris populaire, Cimetière des Saints-Innocents XVIe-XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihm, Arend. 1998. Arbeitersprache und gesprochene Sprache im 19. Jahrhundert. In Dieter Cherubim, Siegfried Grosse & Klaus J. Mattheier (eds.), Sprache und bürgerliche Nation: Beiträge zur deutschen und europäischen Sprachgeschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, 282–316. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millar, Robert McColl. 2012. The problem of reading dialect in semiliterate letters. The correspondence of the Holden family, 1812–16 and of Richard Taylor 1840–51. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 163–177. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Middle English dialectology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume II. 1066–1476, 156–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
.1994. The notion of ‘standard language’ and its applicability to the study of Early Modern English pronunciation. In Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds.), Towards a Standard English 1600–1800, 19–29. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The ideology of the standard language. In Carmen Llmamas, Louise Mullany & Peter Stockwell (eds.), The Routledge companion to sociolinguistics, 133–139. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, Linda C. 2007. Letter-writing instruction manuals in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century England. In: Carol Poster & Linda C. Mitchell (eds.), Letter-writing manuals and instruction from antiquity to the present: Historical and bibliographical studies, 178–199. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84. 69–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MNW = Middelnederlandsch Woordenboek. [URL].
Moonen, Arnold. 1706. Nederduitsche spraekkunst. Amsterdam: Halma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mostart, D. 1637. Nederduytse secretaris oft zendbriefschryver, met een tytelboexken. Amsterdam: Dirck Pietersz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2003. Family first: Address and subscription formulae in English family correspondence from the fifteenth to the seventeenth century. In: Irma Taavitsainen & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on address term systems, 147–176. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. Address in early English correspondence: Its forms and socio-pragmatic functions. Helsinki: Société Néphilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2001. Continental conventions in early English Correspondence. In: Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genre, 203–224. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin Brunberg. 1995. Constraints on politeness: The pragmatics of address formulae in early English correspondence. In: Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English, 541–601. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds). 1996. Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. London etc.: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2012. Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations, and paradigms. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 22–40. Chicester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Gijsbert Rutten. 2012. Introduction: comparative historical sociolinguistics and the history of negation. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113. 261–273.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade. 2006. Standardisation. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 271–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nitta, H. 2002. Historische Entwicklung des Bestandes der subordinierenden Konjunktionen des Deutschen. In P. Wiesinger, et al. (eds.), Akten des X. Internationalen Germanistenkongresses. Vol. 2, 321–330. Berlin etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nobels, Judith. 2013. (Extra)Ordinary letters: A view from below on seventeenth-century Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nobels, Judith & Marijke van der Wal. 2012. Linking words to writers: Building a reliable corpus for historical sociolinguistic research. In Nils Langer, Steffan Davies & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Language and history, linguistics and historiography: Interdisciplinary approaches, 343–361. Bern etc.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2000. Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nowak, Martin A. & David C. Krakauer. 1999. The evolution of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 96. 8028–8033.
Nowak, Martin A., Joshua B. Plotkin & Vincent A.A. Jansen. 2000. The evolution of syntactic communication. Nature 404. 495–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nurmi, Arja. 2002. Does size matter? The Corpus of Early English Correspondence and its sampler. In Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Matti Rissanen (eds), Variation past and present: VARIENG studies on English for Terttu Nevalainen, 173–184. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 2002 [1982]. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the world. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ONW = Oudnederlands Woordenboek. [URL].
Paardekooper, Piet 2006. Bloei en ondergang van onbeperkt ne/en, vooral dat bij niet-woorden. neerlandistiek.nl 06.02 (see [URL]).
Pahta, Päivi, Minna Palander-Collin, Minna Nevala & Arja Nurmi. 2010. Language practices in the construction of social roles in Late Modern English. In: Pahta, Päivi, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English, 1–27. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna, Minna Nevala & Arja Nurmi. 2009. The language of daily life in the history of English: Studying how macro meets micro. In Arja Nurmi, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 1–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Frances Hodgetts Syder. 1983. Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 7. 551–579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Planque, P.A. 1926. Valcooch’s regel der Duytsche schoolmeesters: Bijdrage tot de kennis van het schoolwezen in de zestiende eeuw. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Polenz, Peter. 1994. Deutsche Sprachgeschichte vom Spätmittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. Volume II. 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Deutsche Sprachgeschichte vom Spätmittelalter bis zur Gegenwart, Volume I. Einführung – Grundbegriffe - 14. bis 16 Jahrhundert. 2nd ed. Berlin & New York: de GruyterGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poss, Michaela & Ton van der Wouden. 2005. Extended lexical units in Dutch. In: T. van der Wouden, M. Poss, H. Reckman, & C. Cremers (eds.), Computational linguistics in the Netherlands 2004: Selected papers from the fifteenth CLIN meeting, 187–202. Utrecht: LOT. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poster, Carol & Linda C. Mitchell (eds.). 2007. Letter-writing manuals and instruction from antiquity to the present: Historical and bibliographical studies. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice & Martin Neef. 2004. Introduction: From letter to sound: new perspectives on writing systems. Written Language and Literacy 7. 133–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rem, Margit. 2003. De taal van de klerken uit de Hollandse grafelijke kanselarij (1300–1340). Naar een lokaliseringsprocedure voor het veertiende-eeuws Middelnederlands. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. 1999. Syntax. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume III. 1476–1776, 187–331. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roosenboom, H.Th.M. 1997. De dorpsschool in de Meijerij van ’s-Hertogenbosch van 1648 tot 1795. Tilburg: Stichting Zuidelijk Historisch Contact.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruberg, Willemijn. 2005. Conventionele correspondentie: briefcultuur van de Nederlandse elite, 1770–1850. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert. 2008. Norms for style and grammar in eighteenth-century Dutch prose, and the effect of education and of writing experience. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics. See [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009a. Uit de geschiedenis van de spelling: Over de scherp- en zachtlange [e:] en [o:]. Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 119. 85–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Grammar to the people: The Dutch language and the public sphere in the 18th century. With special reference to Kornelis van der Palm. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft 19. 55–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Vroegmoderne relativa: naar een diachrone constructiegrammatica. Nederlandse Taalkunde 15. 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Lowthian” linguistics across the North Sea. Historiographia Linguistica 39. 43–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert, Rik Vosters & Marijke van der Wal. To appear. Frenchification in discourse and practice: Loan morphology in Dutch private letters of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In Catharina Peersman, Gijsbert Rutten & Rik Vosters (eds.). Romance-Germanic contact in the Low Countries. The past, present and future of a “language border”. Berlin: De Gruyter.
. 2012. Functions of epistolary formulae in Dutch letters from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13. 173–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Epistolary formulae and writing experience in Dutch letters from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten, Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 45–65. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. To appear. Discourse continuity and the written channel: Continuative relative clauses in the history of Dutch. In: Hubert Cuykens, Lobke Ghesquiere and Daniël Van Olmen (eds.), Aspects of grammaticalization.
Rutten, Gijsbert, Marijke van der Wal, Judith Nobels & Tanja Simons. 2012. Negation in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch: A historical-sociolinguistic perspective. Neuphilo­logische Mitteilungen 113. 323–342.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivian. 1999. Orthography and punctuation. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume III 1476–1776, 13–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey, David Gil & Peter Trudgill. 2009. Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SAND = Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten. Vol. II. Ed. Sjef Barbiers, Johan Van der Auwera, Hans Bennis, Eefje Boef, Gunther De Vogelaer & Margreet van der Ham. Amsterdam 2008: Amsterdam University Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2002. Investigating variation and change in written documents. In Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 67–96. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Moritz/ van Loey, Adolphe. 1954. 5th ed. Historische grammatica van het Nederlands. Zutphen: Thieme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonenboom, J. 1997. De geschiedenis van dat, wat en hetgeen in bijbelvertalingen. Nederlandse Taalkunde 2. 343–369.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Schutter, Georges & Hanne Kloots. 2000. Relatieve woorden in het literaire Nederlands van de 17e eeuw. Nederlandse Taalkunde 5. 325–342.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de la Serre, J.P. 1654. Fatsoenlicke zend-brief-schrijver. Amsterdam: Jacob Benjamin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Sijs, Nicoline. 2004. Taal als mensenwerk: het ontstaan van het ABN. The Hague: Sdu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Tanja. 2009. “Ik heb ook nu niet uijt mijn alderbest geschreven”: Achttiende-eeuwse brievenboekjes en de gekaapte brieven van Aagje Luijtsen. De Achttiende Eeuw 41. 167–191.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Ongekend 18e-eeuws Nederlands: Taalvariatie in persoonlijke brieven. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1998. The lexical item. In: Edda Wiegand (ed.), Contrastive lexical semantics, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The phrase, the whole phrase and nothing but the phrase. In: Granger & Meunier 2008, 407–410.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Anna Mauranen. 2006. Linear unit grammar: integrating speech and writing. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smyters, Anthoni. 1613. Schryf-kunst-boeck. Amsterdam: Nicolaes Biestkens.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Statenbijbel 1637. Biblia: Dat is de gantsche H. Schrifture, vervattende alle de canonijcke boeken des Ouden en des Nieuwen Testaments. ­­Leiden: Paulus Aertsz. van Ravensteyn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker (eds.). 2003. Diachronic perspectives on address term systems. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1987. Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language 63. 574–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 1987. The auxiliary DO in eighteenth-century English: A sociohistorical-linguistic approach. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Of formulas and friends: Expressions of politeness in John Gay’s letters. In Guy A.J. Tops, Betty Devriendt, Steven Geukens (eds.), Thinking English grammar to honour Xavier Dekeyser, 99–112. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Of social networks and linguistic influence: The language of Robert Lowth and his correspondents. International Journal of English Studies 5.1. 135–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The 1760s: Grammars, grammarians and the booksellers. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-­writing in eighteenth-century England, 101–124. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Tollenaere, F. 1957. Fonologie of versleer? Was de ‘h’ in het 16de-eeuwse Amsterdams een ‘wankel foneem’?. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 75. 119–144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van den Toorn, Maarten C. 1977. De problematiek van de Nederlandse aanspreekvormen. De Nieuwe Taalgids 70. 520–540.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Tricht, H.W. 1976–1979. De briefwisseling van Pieter Corneliszoon Hooft. 3 vols. Culemborg: Tjeenk Willink & Noorduijn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialect in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandenbussche, Wim. 1999. “Arbeitersprache” in Bruges during the 19th century. In Helga Bister-Broosen (ed.), Beiträge zur historischen Stadtsprachenforschung, 49–65. Vienna: Edition Praesen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Dutch orthography in lower, middle and upper class documents in 19th-century Flanders. In Andrew Linn & Nicola McLelland (eds.), Standardization: studies from the Germanic languages, 27–42. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verdenius, Andries A. 1943. Het h-phoneem in het 17de-eeuwse Amsterdams. De Nieuwe Taalgids 37. 141–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vermaas, J.A.M. 2002. Veranderingen in de Nederlandse aanspreekvormen van de dertiende t/m de twintigste eeuw. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vink, Leendert. 2004. Dialect en dialectverandering in Katwijk aan Zee. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Vliet, Adri P. 2007. ‘Een vriendelijcke groetenisse’. Brieven van het thuisfront aan de vloot van De Ruyter (1664–1665). Franeker: Van Wijnen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
VNMW = Vroegmiddelnederlands Woordenboek. [URL].
de Vogelaer, Gunther. 2008. De Nederlandse en Friese subjectsmarkeerders: geografie, typologie en diachronie. Gent: KANTL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vooys, Cornelius G.N. 1952. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse taal. 5th ed. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vosters, Rik. 2011. Taalgebruik, taalnormen en taalbeschouwing in Vlaanderen tijdens het Verenigd Koninkrijk der Nederlanden: Een historisch-sociolinguïstische verkenning van vroeg-negentiende-eeuws Zuidelijk Nederlands. PhD dissertation. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vosters, Rik & Wim Vandenbussche. 2012. Bipartite negation in 18th and early 19th century Southern Dutch: Sociolinguistic aspects of norms and variation. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113. 343–364.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vosters, Rik, Gijsbert Rutten & Marijke van der Wal (2010). Mythes op de pijnbank: Naar een herwaardering van de taalsituatie in de Nederlanden in de achttiende en negentiende eeuw. Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Taal- en Letterkunde 120. 93–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke1990. Taalidealen, taalnormen en taalverandering: Johan de Brune in linguïstisch perspectief. In P.J. Verkruijsse (ed.), Johan de Brune de Oude (1588–1658): Een Zeeuws literator en staatsman uit de zeventiende eeuw ,54–68. Middelburg: Koninklijk Zeeuwsch Genootschap der Wetenschappen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Relativisation in the history of Dutch: major shift or lexical change? In Patricia Poussa (ed.), Relativisation on the North Sea littoral, 27–36. München: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke. 2006. Onvoltooid verleden tijd: Witte vlekken in de taalgeschiedenis. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Eighteenth-century linguistic variation from the perspective of a Dutch diary and a collection of private letters. In Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Schar­loth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000), 83–96. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. 18de-eeuwse brieven, taalverandering en de “language history from below”. Tydskrif vir Nederlands en Afrikaans, 15(1). 93–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke, Gijsbert Rutten & Tanja Simons. 2012. Letters as loot. Confiscated letters filling major gaps in the history of Dutch. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 139–161. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke & Gijsbert Rutten. 2013a. Variatie, conventies en verandering: Zeventiende- en achttiende-eeuwse buitgemaakte brieven onder de loep. Internationale Neerlandistiek 51. 122–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. The practice of letter writing: Skills, models, and Early Modern Dutch manuals. Language & History 56. 18–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Wal, Marijke J. & Gijsbert Rutten (eds). 2013c. Ego-documents in a historical-sociolinguistic perspective. In Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten (eds), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 1–17. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 1989. Relevance and relational work: Linguistic politeness as politic behavior. Multilingua 8. 131–166 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard & Peter Trudgill (eds.). 2002. Alternative histories of English. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weijnen, A. 1956. Zeventiende-eeuwse taal. Zutphen: W.J. Thieme & Cie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weijnen, Antonius A. 1966. Nederlandse dialectkunde. Assen: van Gorcum etc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whyman, Susan E. 2009. The pen and the people: English letter writers 1660–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willemyns, Roland & Wim Vandenbussche. 2000. Historische sociolinguïstiek: het ‘Brugge-project’. Taal en Tongval 52. 258–276.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WNT = Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal. [URL]
van der Wouden, Ton. 1994. Negative contexts. PhD dissertation. University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. On the development of marked negation systems: The Dutch situation in the seventeenth century. In Richard M. Hogg & Linda van Bergen (eds), Historical Linguistics 1995, Volume 2, 311–329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Wulf, Chris, Jan Goossens & Johan Taeldeman. 2005. Fonologische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten, Deel IV: de consonanten. Ghent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue