Article In: AILA Review: Online-First Articles
Dealing with topics of potential cross-cultural sensitivity among transnational groups of pre-service language teachers in video-mediated virtual exchange interactions
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Conversations involving potentially sensitive topics across cultures pose challenges not only for L2 speakers engaged in intercultural communication but also for researchers seeking to understand the mechanisms of such interactions. Digital spaces have long offered rich affordances to address these challenges — primarily by facilitating easier cross-cultural access and creating pedagogically and interculturally meaningful interactive environments. This article explores one such setting: video-mediated interactions among pre-service language teachers within the scope of a virtual exchange project between Türkiye and Poland. Using multimodal conversation analysis, the study examines how participants manage cross-culturally sensitive topics (e.g., religion and history/war) on a turn-by-turn basis during video-mediated interactions. I argue that virtual exchange contexts can serve as ‘safe’ spaces for ‘brave’ conversations and for engaging with sensitive issues, where topic initiations do not typically lead to tension or conflict — even when the legitimacy of the topic may be negotiable. The findings reveal that sensitive topics are managed through a variety of interactional resources, including laughter, topic continuers or shifters, extended elaborations, or brief and counter-argumentative responses, depending on the topic initiated. The findings offer new insights into the challenges and affordances of digital spaces for applied linguistics, intercultural communication, and language teacher education research.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Methods
- Analysis and findings: Dealing with potentially sensitive topics across cultures
- Discussion and conclusion
References
References (87)
Arano, Y. (2019). Interculturality as an interactional achievement: Doubting others’ nationality and accounting for the doubt. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 12(2), 167–189.
Badem, A., & Balaman, U. (2025). Word search sequences in video-mediated task-oriented L2 interactions: Affordances for intercultural exchange. Language and Intercultural Communication, 0(0), 1–15.
Badem-Korkmaz, F., & Balaman, U. (2020). Third position repair for resolving troubles in understanding teacher instructions. Linguistics and Education, 60, 100859.
Badem-Korkmaz, F., Ekin, S., & Balaman, U. (2022). Pre-service language teachers’ resistance to teacher trainer advice on task design for video-mediated L2 interaction. Classroom Discourse, 13(2), 212–230.
Balaman, U. (2023). Conversation analytic language teacher education in digital spaces. Palgrave Macmillan.
Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68–99. [URL].
Belz, J. A., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Thomson Heinle. [URL]
Bilki, Z., Satar, M., & Sak, M. (2023). Critical digital literacy in virtual exchange for ELT teacher education: An interpretivist methodology. ReCALL, 35(1), 58–73.
Bolden, G. B. (2014). Negotiating understanding in “intercultural moments” in immigrant family interactions. Communication Monographs, 81(2), 208–238.
Brandt, A., & Jenks, C. (2011). ‘Is it okay to eat a dog in Korea…like China?’ Assumptions of national food-eating practices in intercultural interaction. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11(1), 41–58.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Chun, D. M. (2011). Developing intercultural communicative competence through online exchanges. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 392–419. [URL].
Çimenli, B., Sert, O., & Jenks, C. (2022). Topic maintenance in video-mediated virtual exchanges: Rolling the ball back in L2 interactions. System, 108, 102834.
Çolak, F., & Balaman, U. (2025). Dealing with divergent feedback trajectories in video-mediated, transnational, and collaborative task design meetings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 54, 100936.
Colpaert, J. (2020). Editorial position paper: How virtual is your research? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 653–664.
Day, D. (2008). Being ascribed, and resisting, membership of an ethnic group. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in Talk (pp. 151–170). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Dooly, M. A. (2011). Crossing the intercultural borders into 3rd space culture(s): Implications for teacher education in the twenty-first century. Language and Intercultural Communication, 11(4), 319–337.
Dooly, M. A., & Sadler, R. (2013). Filling in the gaps: Linking theory and practice through telecollaboration in teacher education. ReCALL, 25.
Dooly, M. A., & Tudini, V. (2016). ‘Now we are teachers’: The role of small talk in student language teachers’ telecollaborative task development. Journal of Pragmatics, 102, 38–53.
(2022). ‘We should google that’: The dynamics of knowledge-in-interaction in an online student meeting. Classroom Discourse, 13(2), 188–211.
Drixler, N. (2022). Features of online second language interactional competence in a German-Israeli virtual exchange. TESOL in Context, 30(2), Article 2.
Ekin, S. (2025). Development of interactional competence in a virtual exchange setting: Focus on diversification of participatory actions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24.
Ekin, S., & Balaman, U. (2024). Video-mediated collaborative lesson planning in virtual exchange among transnational teams of pre-service language teachers. ReCALL, 1–17.
Ekin, S., Balaman, U., & Badem-Korkmaz, F. (2024). Tracking telecollaborative tasks through design, feedback, implementation, and reflection processes in pre-service language teacher education. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(1), 31–60.
Fukuda, C. (2006). Resistance against being formulated as cultural other: The case of a Chinese student in Japan. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 429–456.
Glimäng, M. R. (2022). Safe/brave spaces in virtual exchange on sustainability. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 5, 61–81.
Glimäng, M. R., & Magadán, C. (2024). Saying and doing: A multiliteracies analysis of preservice teachers’ virtual exchange at the onset of COVID-19. Language and Intercultural Communication, 24(3), 241–258.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Telecollaboration as an approach to developing intercultural communication competence. [URL]
Hansen, A. D. (2005). A Practical Task: Ethnicity as a Resource in Social Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(1), 63–104.
Hauck, M. (2019). Virtual exchange for (critical) digital literacy skills development. European Journal of Language Policy, 11(2), 187–210.
(2023). From virtual exchange to critical virtual exchange and critical internationalization at home. The Global Impact Exchange, 2023(Spring), 9–12.
Hauser, E. (2017). Avoiding initiation of repair in L2 conversations-for-learning. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 235–256.
Havadar, E. E., & Balaman, U. (2024). Preliminaries in paired role play L2 interactional competence assessment tasks. Classroom Discourse, 15(2), 143–160.
Helm, F. (2015). The practices and challenges of telecollaboration in higher education in Europe. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 197–217.
(2016). Facilitated dialogue in online intercultural exchange. In R. O’Dowd & T. Lewis (Eds.), Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice (pp. 150–172). Routledge.
Higgins, C. (2007). Constructing membership in the in-group: Affiliation and resistance among urban Tanzanians. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 49–70.
(2009). Are you Hindu?”: Resisting membership categorization through language alternation. In H. t. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives, (pp. 111–136). National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawaii.
Hua, Z., Wei, L., & Jankowicz-Pytel, D. (2019). Intercultural moments in translating and humanising the socio-legal system. Language and Intercultural Communication, 19(6), 488–504.
Jenks, C. (2012). Doing being reprehensive: Some interactional features of English as a lingua franca in a chat room. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 386–405.
Kanat Mutluoğlu, A., & Balaman, U. (2023). The use of Video Enhanced Observation in video-mediated post-observation conversations on pre-service EFL teachers’ online practicum teaching. System, 118, 103151.
Kardaş İşler, N. (2025). Dealing with controversial issues in primary school classroom interactions in social studies courses. Learning and Instruction, 96, 102076.
Kim, Y. (2019). ‘What is stoyr-steruh type?’: Knowledge asymmetry, intersubjectivity, and learning opportunities in conversation-for-learning. Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 307–328.
Kim, Y., & Silver, R. E. (2021). “What do you think about this?”: Differing role enactment in post-observation conversation. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee, & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based conversation analytic research: Theoretical and applied perspectives on pedagogy (Vol. 46, pp. 303–328). Springer International Publishing.
Klimanova, L., & Hellmich, E. A. (2021). Crossing transcultural liminalities with critical virtual exchange: A study of shifting border discourses. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18(3), 273–304.
Kurek, M., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2017). Task design for telecollaborative exchanges: In search of new criteria. System, 64, 7–20.
Loranc-Paszylk, B., Hilliker, S. M., & Lenkaitis, C. A. (2021). Virtual exchanges in language teacher education: Facilitating reflection on teaching practice through the use of video. TESOL Journal, n/a(n/a), e580.
Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topical talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 301–316.
Moalla, A., Abid, N., & Balaman, U. (2020). Task-enhanced virtual exchange between University of Sfax, Tunisia, and Hacettepe University, Turkey. In F. Helm & A. Beaven (Eds.), Designing and implementing virtual exchange — a collection of case studies (1st ed., pp. 117–126). Research-publishing.net.
Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62.
Mori, J. (2003). The construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 36(2), 143–184.
(2007). Reconstructing the participants’ treatments of ‘interculturality’: Variations in data and methodologies. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 123–141.
Nao, M. (2015). ‘So you are from England’: Categorization and cultural reduction in first-time conversation lounge encounters between foreign teachers and Japanese students of EFL. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 194–214.
Nicolaou, A., Sauro, S., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Sundqvist, P. (2025). Critical virtual exchange to address teachers’ needs in times of conflict. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 8, 54–66.
Nishizaka, A. (1995). The interactive constitution of interculturality: How to be a Japanese with words. Human Studies, 18(2–3), 301–326.
(1999). Doing interpreting within interaction: The interactive accomplishment of a “Henna Gaijin” or “Strange Foreigner.” Human Studies, 22(2–4), 235–251.
Nowicka, A. (2022). Negotiating religious identity categories in non-professional interviews using English as a lingua franca. Intercultural Pragmatics, 19(1), 103–131.
O’Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1–23.
O’Dowd, R., & Lewis, T. (2016). Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Routledge.
Oittinen, T. (2022). Negotiating collaborative and inclusive practices in university students’ group-to-group videoconferencing sessions. Linguistics and Education, 71, 101107.
Önder, Z., & Balaman, U. (2025). Situated orientations to interculturality in video-mediated virtual exchange interactions. In H. R’boul (Ed.), Teaching and researching interculturality in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 203–221). Routledge.
Park, J.-E. (2007). Co-construction of nonnative speaker identity in cross-cultural interaction. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 339–360.
Pekarek Doehler, S., & Balaman, U. (2021). The routinization of grammar as a social action format: A longitudinal study of video-mediated interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 183–202.
Petitjean, C., & González-Martínez, E. (2015). Laughing and smiling to manage trouble in French-language classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 6(2), 89–106.
Ryoo, H.-K. (2007). Interculturality serving multiple interactional goals in African American and Korean service encounters. Pragmatics, 17(1), 23–47.
Sacks, H. (1972a). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. N. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). Free Press. [URL]
(1972b). On the analysability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (pp. 325–345). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [URL]
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
Satar, M., & Çimenli Olcars, B. (2025). Online intercultural exchange in language teacher education: Interactional resources for topic transition. Classroom Discourse, 1–29.
Satar, M., Hauck, M., & Bilki, Z. (2023). Multimodal representation in virtual exchange: A social semiotic approach to critical digital literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 72–96.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, Special Issue: Diversity and Continuity in Conversation Analysis, 39(3), 462–482.
Schmiderer, K., Brocca, N., Guggenbichler, E., & Konzett-Firth, C. (2025). Exploring pre-service teachers’ criteria for evaluating collaboratively designed online tasks. TASK, 5(1), 57–87.
Sert, O., & Ishino, M. (2025). Collaborative noticing of multimodality in language classroom interaction: A telecollaboration project between student-teachers of English in Sweden and Japan. TESOL Journal, 16(4), e70072.
Sert, O., & Jacknick, C. M. (2015). Student smiles and the negotiation of epistemics in L2 classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, 77, 97–112.
Shrikant, N. (2021). Cultural difference as a resource for arguments in institutional interactions. Communication Monographs, 88(2), 219–236.
Siegel, A. (2016). “Oh no, it’s just culture”: Multicultural identities in action in ELF interactions. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 26(2), 193–215.
Tudini, V. (2007). Negotiation and intercultural learning in Italian native speaker chat rooms. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 577–601.
Tudini, V., & Dooly, M. A. (2021). Complaining for rapport building: Troubles talk in a preservice language teacher online video exchange. Linguistics and Education, 64, 100941.
Turan, P., & Yiğitoğlu Aptoula, N. (2025). Managing intersubjectivity through screen-sharing in video-mediated reflective feedback sessions in pre-service language teacher education. System, 103608.
Uyar, G., & Balaman, U. (2025). Claims of teacher learning and retrospective tracing of claimed events in video-mediated transnational virtual exchange interactions. Applied Linguistics.
Uyar, G., & Can Daşkın, N. (2024). Change of epistemic stance of transnational pre-service teachers in-and-through collaborative data-led reflective dialogues. Bogazici University Journal of Education, 41(1), 35–51.
Üzüm, B., Akayoglu, S., & Yazan, B. (2020). Using telecollaboration to promote intercultural competence in teacher training classrooms in Turkey and the USA. ReCALL, 32(2), 162–177.
Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (2015). Doing reflective practice: A data-led way forward: ELT Journal, 69(4), 351–362.
Whitehead, K. A., Raymond, G., & Stokoe, E. H. (2024). Analyzing categorial phenomena in talk-in-interaction. In J. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Research Methods in Conversation Analysis (pp. 541–576). Cambridge University Press. [URL].
Zimmerman, E. (2007). Constructing Korean and Japanese interculturality in talk: Ethnic membership categorization among users of Japanese. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 71–94.