Article In: Asian Languages and Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Topic chains across registers in Kazakh
A typological perspective
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
Topic chains represent a significant and widespread phenomenon across languages. The initiation of a topic
signifies the commencement of a topic chain, with the successive utilization of zero anaphora being a distinct formal feature of
such chains. Coreferentiality is the fundamental property linking clauses to form a topic chain. In Kazakh’s written texts and
spoken discourse, nominal forms, pronominal anaphora and zero anaphora are the primary expressions. Specific empirical data
demonstrate that written discourse favors zero anaphora (56.92%), followed by pronominal (27.69%) and nominal forms (15.39%),
whereas spoken discourse exhibits comparable frequencies between zero anaphora (46.39%) and pronominal anaphora (44.25%), with
nominal forms being marginal (9.36%). Furthermore, the formal expression and discourse-organizing functions of topic chains
demonstrate both similarities and differences among various language types. This research compares the structures and functions of
topic chains in languages that are topic prominent, subject prominent and topic–subject dual prominent. By descriptively analyzing
the commonalities and specificities among Kazakh, its genetically related languages and other languages, it is suggested that
Altaic family languages exhibit features of topic–subject dual prominence. Taken together, cross-linguistic and registers’
evidence indicates that language typology, as a deep-level structural constraint, governs the choice of referential selection and
structural continuity in topic chains. In contrast, register variation, as a surface-level regulatory factor, fine-tunes the
specific expressions, chain length and other aspects of topic chains through functional preferences and contextual adaptation,
thereby optimizing their expressive adequacy in specific communicative situations to achieve discourse goals. Nonetheless, the
arrangement and coherence of topic chains in all languages and registers are shaped by universal cognitive principles, the
principle of linguistic economy and sociocultural norms.
Keywords: linguistic typology, topic chain, register, Kazakh, Chinese, cross-linguistic
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.The topic chain in different registers of Kazakh
- 3.1The topic chain in written text
- 3.1.1Topic chain analysis in Never Give Up (excerpt)
- 3.1.2Topic chain analysis in Abay Kunanbay (excerpt)
- 3.1.3Topic chain analysis in The Transparent Radish (excerpt)
- 3.2Topic chains in spoken discourse
- 3.2.1Topic chain analysis in My Family (excerpt)
- 3.2.2Topic chain analysis in Class Meeting (excerpt)
- 3.2.3Topic chain analysis in The Orphan (excerpt)
- 3.1The topic chain in written text
- 4.Topic chains across typologically diverse languages
- 4.1Topic chains in topic prominent languages
- 4.2Topic chains in subject prominent languages
- 4.3Topic chains in topic-subject dual prominent languages
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
- Abbreviations
- Author queries
References
References (19)
Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness,
Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics and point of
view. In Li, C. N. (Eds.), Subject
and
Topic (pp. 27–55). New York: Academic Press.
(1994). Discourse
consciousness and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and
writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chu, Chauncey C. (2018). Hanyu pianzhangju jiqi
linghuoxing: Cong huati lian shuoqi [Chinese discourse sentences and their
flexibility: Starting from the topic chain]. Dangdai Xiucixue [Contemporary
Rhetoric], (2): 1–22.
Dixon, R. M. W. (1972). The
Dyirbal Language of North
Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Givón, T. (1983). Topic
Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-linguistic Study, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Company Publishing Company.
Guo, H. (2024). Hasakeyu
xinxi jiegou yanjiu [Research on the Information Structure of the
Kazakh]. Beijing: Minzu University of China Ph.D. Dissertation.
Krifka, M. & Musan, R. (2012). Information
Structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In Krifka, M. & Musan, R. (Eds.), The
Expression of Information
Structure (pp. 1–43). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson (1976). Subject
and Topic: A New Typology of Language. In Li, Charles N. ed., Subject and
Topic (pp. 457–489). New York: Academic Press.
(1979). Third-person
pronoun and zero anaphora in Chinese Discourse. In Givón, T. ed., Discourse
and
Syntax (pp. 311–335). New York: Academic Press.
Liu, D. (2011). Yuyan
Kucang leixingxue gouxiang [The framework of Linguistic Inventory
Typology]. Dangdai yuyanxue [Contemporary
Linguistics]. (4): 289–303+379.
(2012). Hanyu
de ruogan xianhe fanchou: Yuyan Kucang leixingxue shijiao [Some prominent
categories in Chinese: A Linguistic Inventory Typology perspective]. Shijie Hanyu
jiaoxue [Chinese Teaching in the
World]. (3): 291–305.
Maihmut, G. (2021). Xiandai
Weiwueryu Kaqunhua de tedian yanjiu [A Study on the Characteristics of
Modern Uyghur Kagan Dialects]. Beijing: Minzu University of China Master Dissertation.
Payne, T. E. (1997). Describing
Morphosyntax: A guide for Field Linguists. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company [Reprint
2010. Beijing: World Book Publishing Company].
Surgalalt (2019). Xiandai
Mengguyu Sunite tuyu getixi yanjiu [A study on the case system of Sunite
dialect in Modern Mongolian]. Beijing: Minzu University of China Ph.D. Dissertation.
Tsao, F. (1979/1995). Zhuti
zai Hanyu zhongde Gongneng Yanjiu: Maixiang Yuduan Fenxide Diyibu [A Study on the
Function of Themes in Chinese: The First Step Towards Discourse
Analysis]. Beijing: Language and Culture Press.