Article In: Asia-Pacific Language Variation: Online-First Articles
Subject pronominal expression in Mandarin
Production patterns and the perception-production relationship
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This study investigates production patterns of Mandarin subject pronoun
expression (SPE) and the understudied relationship between evaluative judgments and actual
usage of this feature. Building on established perception patterns among 185 native
Mandarin speakers, these participants completed narrative production tasks in two distinct
discourse contexts: a frog story task and a map task. Mixed-effects analyses revealed that
linguistic constraints like referent continuity and clause type significantly conditioned
SPE production, whereas social factors did not. Furthermore, task type interacted with
grammatical number, reflecting dynamic discourse effects due to interactions of linguistic
forms and communicative demands. Crucially, a significant perception-production
correlation emerged exclusively for low-rate SPE stimuli (the native norm). No alignment
appeared for mid or high rates, which speakers rated as less appropriate. These findings
suggest that (1) linguistic constraints outweigh social constraints for Mandarin SPE
production, and (2) perception or evaluation and production are linked through the
alignment between production rate and targeted perceptual dimensions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Perception, evaluation, and production in language variation
- 2.1.1The connections between language perception and production
- 2.1.2Perception versus evaluation
- 2.2Target feature: Mandarin subject pronoun expression
- 2.2.1Mandarin SPE: Internal linguistic constraints
- 2.2.2Mandarin SPE: External social constraints
- 2.1Perception, evaluation, and production in language variation
- 3.The current study
- 3.1Methods
- 3.1.1Materials
- 3.1.2Participants
- 3.1.3Procedure
- Perceiving given narratives
- Storytelling: The frog story
- The map task
- 3.1Methods
- 4.Coding and analysis
- 5.Results
- 5.1On overall production of SPE across the two tasks
- 5.2On perception and production relationships
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Internal constraints outweigh external factors in SPE production
- 6.2The role of discourse and context
- 6.3Evaluation/perception-production relationships
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (106)
Adli, Aria (2011). Gradient acceptability and frequency effects in information structure: A quantitative study on Spanish, Catalan, and Persian. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat Freiburg.
Altmann, Christian F., Uesaki, Masato, Ono, Kenji, Matsuhashi, Masao, Mima, Tatsuya, and Fukuyama, Hidenao (2014). Categorical speech perception during active discrimination of consonants and vowels. Neuropsychologia, 64,13–23.
Ariel, Mira (1991). The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(5), 443–463.
(2011). Referring expressions and the+/-coreference distinction. In J. Gundel & N. Hedberg (Eds.), Reference and referent accessibility (pp. 13–36). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Barbosa, Pilar, Duarte, Maria E. L., & Kato, Mary A. (2005). Null subjects in European and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 4(2), 11–52.
Bates, Douglas (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.5823.
Bayley, Robert, & Pease-Alvarez, Lucinda (1996). Null and expressed pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children’s Spanish. In J. Arnold et al. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis (pp. 85–99). CSLI Publications.
Beaman, Karen V. (2024). Language change in real-and apparent-time: Coherence in the individual and the Community. Taylor & Francis.
Buchstaller, Isabella K. (2004). The sociolinguistic constraints on the quotative system: British English and US English compared. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Edinburgh.
Cacoullos, Rena T. & Travis, Catherine E. (2018). Bilingualism in the community: Code-switching and grammars in contact. Cambridge University Press.
Cai, Zhengguang G., Sun, Zheng, and Zhao, Ning (2021). Interlocutor modelling in lexical alignment: The role of linguistic competence. Journal of Memory and Language, 121, 104278.
Cameron, Richard (1993). Ambiguous agreement, functional compensation, and nonspecific tú in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change, 5(3), 305–334.
Cameron, Richard, & Flores-Ferrán, Nydia (2004). Perseveration of subject expression across regional’ dialects of Spanish. Spanish in Context, 1(1),41–65.
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2009). The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change, 21(1), 135–156.
(2011). Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech, 86(1), 52–68.
Cargile, Aaron C. & Giles, Howard (1997). Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity. Language & Communication, 17(3),195–217.
Casserly, Elizabeth D., and Pisoni, David B. (2010). Speech perception and production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(5), 629–647.
Chen, Ping (1983). A discourse analysis of third person zero anaphora in Chinese. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of California, Los Angeles.
Clopper, Cynthia G., and Pisoni, David B. (2004). Homebodies and army brats: Some effects of early linguistic experience and residential history on dialect categorization. Language Variation and Change, 16(1), 31–48.
D’Onofrio, Annette (2018). Controlled and automatic perceptions of a sociolinguistic marker. Language Variation and Change, 30(2), 261–285.
Drager, Katie (2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 473–480.
Drager, Katie, & Kirtley, Mary J. (2016). Awareness, salience, and stereotypes in exemplar-based models of speech production and perception. In A. Babel (Ed.), Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research (pp. 1–24). Cambridge University Press.
Dryer, Matthew S. (2013). On the six-way word order typology, again. Studies in Language, 37(2), 267–301.
Erker, Daniel, Guy, Gregory R., Beaman, Karen V., Bayley, Robert, Adli, Aria, Orozco, Rafael, & Zhang, Xinye (forthcoming). Subject pronoun expression: A cross-linguistic variationist sociolinguistic study. Cambridge University Press.
Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. & Stanovich, Keith E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on psychological science, 8(3), 223–241.
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia (2002). Subject personal pronouns in Spanish narratives of Puerto Ricans in New York City: A sociolinguistic perspective. Lincom Europa.
Fowler, Carol A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14(1), 3–28.
Fridland, Valerie & Kendall, Tyler (2012). Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of US English. Lingua, 122(7), 779–793.
Gardner, Matthew H., Uffing, Eline, Van Vaeck, Niels, & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2021). Variation isn’t that hard: Morphosyntactic choice does not predict production difficulty. PLoS One, 16(6), e0252602.
Gívon, Talmy (1983). Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Goldinger, Stephen D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological review, 105(2), 251–279.
Hay, Jennifer, & Drager, Katie (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–892.
Henry, Alison (1995). Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect variation and parameter setting. Oxford University Press.
Jaeggli, Osvaldo, & Safir, Ken J. (1989). The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli & K. J. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 1–44). Springer.
Jia, Lan, & Bayley, Robert (2002). Null pronoun variation in Mandarin Chinese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 8(3), 103–116.
Johnson, Keith et al. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. Mullenix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp.145–165) Academic Press.
Kato, Mary A. and Duarte, Maria E. L. (2021). Parametric variation: The case of Brazilian Portuguese null subjects. Syntactic architecture and its consequences III: Inside syntax (pp. 357–378). Language Science Press.
Labov, William (1966). Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference (pp. 84–113). Mouton.
(1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205–254.
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon., Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej, & Nagy, Naomi (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4), 431–463.
Lambert, Wallace E., Hodgson, Richard C., Gardner, Robert C., & Fillenbaum, Samuel (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2008). Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 76–98). Routledge.
Li, Aini. and Lai, Wei (2025). Gender effects in Mandarin creaky voice evaluation: A matched-guise study. Linguistics Vanguard.
Li, Charles N., & Thompson, Sandra A. (1989). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.
Li, Xiaoshi (2014). Variation in subject pronominal expression in L2 Chinese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 39–68.
Li, Xiaoshi. and Bayley, Robert (2018). Lexical frequency and syntactic variation: Subject pronoun use in Mandarin Chinese. Asia-Pacific Language Variation, 4(2), 135–160.
Li, Xiaoshi, Chen, Xiaoqing, and Chen, Wen-Hsin (2012). Variation of subject pronominal expression in Mandarin Chinese. Sociolinguistic studies, 6(1), 91–119.
Liberman, Alvin M., & Mattingly, Ignatius G. (1985). A specialization for speech perception revised. Cognition, 21(1), 1–36.
MacDonald, Maryellen C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 226.
Mielke, Jeff, Magloughlin, Laura, & Wilbanks, Eric (2019). Speech production and perception: Linking the two via individual differences. Annual Review of Linguistics, 5, 311–331.
Montrul, Silvina (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Morin, Cameron, & Larsson, Martin M. (2025). Large corpora and large language models: a replicable method for automating grammatical annotation. Linguistics Vanguard.
Munro, Murray J., & Derwing, Tracey M. (1995). Processing time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and foreign-accented speech. Language and speech, 38(3), 289–306.
Nagy, Naomi (2024). Heritage Languages: Extending Variationist Approaches. Cambridge University Press.
Niedzielski, Nancy (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of speech events. In D. R. Preston & N. Niedzielski (Eds.), Folk Linguistics (pp. 87–103). De Gruyter Mouton.
Ohala, John J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Masek, R. A. Hendrick, & M. F. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior (pp. 178–203). Chicago Linguistic Society.
Otheguy, Ricardo, Zentella, Ana C., & Livert, David (2007). Language and dialect contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the formation of a speech community. Language, 83(4), 770–802.
Pantos, Andrew J. and Perkins, Andrew W. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of language and social psychology, 32(1), 3–20.
Pflaeging, Jessika, Mackay, Bridget, & Schleef, Erik (2025). Sociolinguistic monitoring and L2 speakers of English. Linguistics, 63(3), 607–638.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001a). Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained. Language and cognitive processes, 16(5–6), 691–698.
(2001b). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure (pp. 137–157). John Benjamins.
(2008). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137–158). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
(2016). Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual review of linguistics, 2(1), 33–52.
Pinget, Anne-France, Kager, René, & Van de Velde, Hans (2020). Linking variation in perception and production in sound change: Evidence from Dutch obstruent devoicing. Language and Speech, 63(3), 660–685.
Preston, Dennis R. (2011). Perceptual dialectology: Nonlinguists’ views of areal linguistics (Vol.7). Walter de Gruyter.
(2013). Language with an attitude. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 157–182). Wiley-Blackwell.
R Core Team (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Reber, Rolf, Schwarz, Norbert, and Winkielman, Piotr (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and social psychology review, 8(4), 364–382.
Rizzi, Luigi (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic inquiry, 17(3), 501–557.
Schilling-Estes, Natalie (1998). Investigating “self-conscious” speech: The performance register in Ocracoke English. Language in society, 27(1), 53–83.
Schleef, Erik (2013). Written surveys and questionnaires in sociolinguistics. In J. Holmes & K. Hazen (Eds.), Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical guide (pp. 42–57). Wiley-Blackwell.
Schmidt, Lauren B. (2015). Not all forms of dialect contact are the same: Effects of regional media, travel, and social contacts on the perception of spanish aspirated-/s/. Borealis — An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 4(1), 99–120.
Sharma, Devyani, & Rampton, Ben (2015). Lectal focusing in interaction: A new methodology for the study of style variation. Journal of English Linguistics, 43(1), 3–35.
Shin, Naomi L. (2012). Variable use of Spanish subject pronouns by monolingual children in Mexico. In K. Geeslin & M. Díaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp. 130–141). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & communication, 23(3–4), 193–229.
Sonderegger, Morgan, Bane, Max, & Graff, Peter (2017). The dynamic systems of speech perception and production in conversation. Laboratory Phonology, 8(1).
Steele, Anna (2025). Perception is political: The production–perception interface as a contested site of power and legibility. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 29(5), 367–370.
Strand, Elizabeth A. (1999). Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 86–100.
Strange, Winifred (1989). Evolving theories of vowel perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(5), 2081–2087.
Sumner, Meghan, & Samuel, Arthur G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 487–501.
Tomasello, Michael (2003). The key is social cognition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 47–57). MIT Press.
Travis, Catherine E. (2007). Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change, 19(2), 101–135.
Trudgill, Peter, & Giles, Howard (1976). Sociolinguistics and linguistic value judgments: Correctness, adequacy and aesthetics. LAUT.
Wade, Lacey, & Tamminga, Meredith (2025). Expectation-driven shifts in perception and production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 158(4), 3517–3528.
Walker, Abby, García, Christina, Cortes, Yajaira, & Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2014). Comparing social meanings across listener and speaker groups: The indexical field of Spanish/s/. Language Variation and Change, 26(2), 169–189.
Warren, Paul, Hay, Jennifer, & Thomas, Beth (2007). The loci of sound change effects in recognition and perception. Laboratory phonology, 9, 87–112.
Wickham, Hadley (2011). ggplot2. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 3(2), 180–185.
Wolfram, Walt (2011). Fieldwork methods in language variation. In R. Wodak, B. Johnstone, & P. Kerswill (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 296–311). SAGE.
Yang, Chin L., Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall, & Hue, Chi W. (2003). Constraining the comprehension of pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition, 86(3), 283–315.
Yu, Alan (2013). Socio-cognitive processing and the actuation of sound change. In A. C. L. Yu (Ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologisation (pp. 201–227). Oxford University Press.
Zhang, Xinye (2021). Language variation in Mandarin as a heritage language: Subject personal pronouns. Heritage Language Journal, 18(1):1–29.