Article published In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Political economy and language education
Liberalising public policy, cross-field effects, and economisation of English language education in Bangladesh
Published online: 31 August 2026
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25118.ali
https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25118.ali
Abstract
Contemporary political economy has redefined relationships between most nation-states and citizens based on
neoliberalism, whereby individuals’ dependency on the state is minimised and self-reliance is emphasised. How such a framing of
the relationships relates to language education policy has not received notable attention in developing societies. Using a
political economy frame and drawing on Bourdieu’s concept of field and his analytical framework of field
analysis, together with Lingard and Rawolle’s theory of cross-field effects, this study conducted policy analysis
to theorise how these emerging relationships provide the basis for the economisation of English language education in Bangladesh.
The analysis highlights how an economistic logic emphasised in public policy governs language education in
relation to a logic of relevance. In the context of political economy in language education, these insights
provide new theoretical directions to understand the processes through which language education is economised via cross-field
effects. The study generates implications for interrogating how language education goals are instrumentalised vis-à-vis pressures
from structurally dominant social fields, and how unequal linguistic human capital distribution may be encouraged by how
state-people relationships are defined in the field of public policy based on the principle of individualisation.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Political economy and language education
- Theorising political economy in language education using cross-field effects
- Methodology
- Research design
- Data and analysis
- Mapping the English language education policy field vis-à-vis the field of power and theorising cross-field
effects
- Systemic effects and economistic logic characterising the field of public policy
- Structural and systemic effects and logic of relevance shaping the field of education policy
- Structural/systemic effects and logic of relevance shaping the field of English language education policy
- Conclusion
- Acknowledgement
References
References (67)
Ali, M., & Hamid, M. O. (2026). English
language and employability in locally produced ELT textbook: Clashes between neoliberal ideals and social class structures in
the pedagogical space. Applied
Linguistics, 47(1), 37–53.
Ali, M. M., Hamid, M. O., & Hardy, I. (2026). Governmental
rationalities and misrecognising human and social conditions in English-in-education policy for individual and social
development. Language
Policy, 25(1),1–26.
Ali, M. M., Hardy, I., Hamid, M. O., & Lingard, B. (2024). Researching
Global Policy Trends through English Language Education in a Global South Context Using Bourdieu’s “Thinking
Tools”. In G. Stahl, G. M. Mu, P. Ayling, & E. B. Weininger (Eds.), The
Bloomsbury Handbook of Bourdieu and Educational Research (1
ed., pp. 305–317). Bloomsbury Academic.
Ali, M. M., Hamid, M. O., Hardy, I., & Khan, A. (2023a). Problematizing
Human Capital Development in English Language Education in Bangladesh. Comparative Education
Review, 67(2), 420–442.
Ali, M. M., Hamid, M. O., & Hardy, I. (2023b). Construction
of English language skills as human capital and ELT as development aid in
Bangladesh. Globalizations, 20(7), 1163–1179.
Ali, M. M., & Hamid, M. O. (2023). Economisation
of the Secondary English Curriculum in Bangladesh. In R. Khan, A. Bashir, B. L. Basu, & M. E. Uddin (Eds.), Local
Research and Glocal Perspectives in English Language Teaching: Teaching in Changing
Times (pp. 81–94). Springer Singapore.
(2022). Neoliberalism
Shaping English Language Teaching in Bangladesh: A Critical
Examination. In A. J. Daghigh, J. M. Jan, & S. Kaur (Eds.), Neoliberalization
of English Language Policy in the Global
South (pp. 35–50). Cham: Springer.
(2020). English
For Human Capital Development. In S. Sultana, M. M. Roshid, M. Z. Haider, M. M. Naushaad Kabir, & M. H. Khan (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of English Language Education in
Bangladesh (pp. 369–381). London: Routledge.
Arcila, F. C. (2018). ELT
policy interpretations and translations in rural Colombia. Current Issues in Language
Planning, 19(4), 363–382.
Asian Development
Bank. (2015). Policy reform in Bangladesh’s secondary education
(1993–2013): Tracing causal processes and examining ABD’s contribution. Retrieved
from [URL].
Azam, M., Chin, A., & Prakash, N. (2013). The
Returns to English-Language Skills in India. Economic Development and Cultural
Change, 61(2), 335–367.
Barnawi, O. Z. (2018). Neoliberalism
and English language education policies in the Arabian
Gulf. London: Routledge.
Block, D. (2017). Political
economy in applied linguistics research. Language
Teaching, 50(1), 32–64.
(2018). Political
economy and sociolinguistics: Neoliberalism, inequality, and social
class. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
(1986). The
forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook
of theory and research for the sociology of
education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An
invitation to reflexive sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). The
‘Myth’ of globalization and the welfare state. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), Acts
of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: The New Press.
Chang, Y. L. (2025). Beyond
common sense: An inquiry into Neoliberalism and English as the medium of instruction in Taiwanese higher
education. Higher Education
Policy, 1–21.
Daghigh, A. J., Jan, J. M., & Kaur, S. (Eds.) (2022). Neoliberalization
of English language policy in the Global
South. Cham: Springer.
Daghigh, A. J., Kaur, S., & Jan, M. J. (2025). Neoliberal
discourse in locally developed Malaysian English language textbooks: a comparison between the pre- and post-neoliberal
eras. Globalisation, Societies and
Education, 23(4), 1080–1095.
English in Action (n.d.). English in
Action: Changing learning, changing lives — An innovation in English language teaching and learning in
Bangladesh. UKaid. [URL].
Flores, N. (2013). The
unexamined relationship between neoliberalism and plurilingualism: A cautionary tale. TESOL
Quarterly 47 (3), 500–520.
(2002). Using
language economics and education economics in language education
policy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Hamid, M. O. (2016). The
politics of language in education in a global polity. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The
handbook of global education
policy (pp. 259–274). Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Huang, M., & Daghigh, A. J. (2026). Neoliberalism
discourse research in language education: a systematic review of trends, themes, and future
directions. Language, Culture and
Curriculum, 1–25.
Irvine, J. T. (1989). When
talk isn’t cheap: language and political economy. American
Ethnologist, 161, 248–267.
Kabir, A. H. (2013). Neoliberalism,
policy reforms and higher education in Bangladesh. Policy Futures in
Education, 11(2), 154–166.
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Karki, T. M. (2024). Impact
of Neoliberalism on Language Educational Policies. Panauti
Journal, 2(1), 111–119.
Kornai, J. (1992). The
socialist system: The political economy of communism. Princeton University Press.
Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2004). Mediatizing
educational policy: The journalistic field, science policy, and cross-field effects. Journal of
Education
Policy, 19(3), 361–380.
Manan, S. A. (2021). ‘English
is like a credit card’: the workings of neoliberal governmentality in English learning in
Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural
Development, 45(4), 987–1003.
Memon, T. & Shah, W. (2024). Universalizing
the particulars: neoliberalizing English language teaching (ELT) through outcome-based education
(OBE). Educational
Linguistics, 3(2), 208–237.
Moghtader, B. (2017). Human
capital and education for desire after Michel Foucault. Journal of Self-Governance and
Management
Economics, 5(4), 35–52.
Muhammad, A. (2021). Development
re-examined: Construction and consequences of neoliberal
Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press Limited.
. (2012). National curriculum:
English: classes VI–X. Dhaka: National Curriculum and Textbook Board.
Ortega, Y. (2022). Late
capitalism and the commodification of English in Colombia: The shaping of language education policy and
practice. In Language Education in Multilingual
Colombia (pp. 131–148). Routledge.
Park, J. S. Y. (2011). The
promise of English: linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job
market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 14(4), 443–455.
(2022). Foreign
language education at the nexus of neoliberalism and coloniality: subjectivity in South Korean discourses of education
reform. Critical Inquiry in Language
Studies, 19(4), 336–354.
Phan, A. N. Q. (2021). Under
the impacts of globalisation: the rising power of English as a foreign language (EFL) and the corresponding response of EFL
policy in Vietnam. SN Social
Sciences, 1(31), 1–16.
Planning Commission. (1997). 5th Five Year
Plan (FY1998–FY2002). Dhaka: General Economic Division (GED), Planning Commission, The People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
. (2011). 6th Five Year
Plan (FY2011–FY2015): Accelerating growth, reducing
poverty. Dhaka: General Economic Division (GED), Planning Commission, The People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
. (2015). 7th Five Year
Plan FY2016–FY2020: Accelerating growth, empowering
citizens. Dhaka: General Economic Division (GED), Planning Commission, The People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
Rahman, M. M., & Pandian, A. (2018). A
critical investigation of English language teaching in Bangladesh: Unfulfilled expectations after two decades of communicative
language teaching. English
Today, 34(3), 43–49.
Rawolle, S., & Lingard, B. (2008). The
sociology of Pierre Bourdieu and researching education policy. Journal of Education
Policy, 23(6), 729–741.
Rury, J. L. (2012). Historical
research in education. In J. L. Green, et al. (Eds.), Handbook
of complementary methods in education
research (pp. 323–332). Routledge.
Shah, W. A. (2025). Enacting
Colonial and Neoliberal Governmentalities through American ELT Programs in Pakistan. TESOL
Quarterly, 591, 1750–1785.
Shah, W. A., & Anjum, S. (2026). Abolishing
the ‘abyssal line’ through southern translingualism: Re-envisioning university ELT pedagogy through teacher-researcher
collaboration in Pakistan. Language Sciences, 1131, Article 101774.
Shin, H. (2015). Language
‘skills’ and the neoliberal English education industry. Journal of Multilingual and
Multicultural
Development, 37(5), 509–522.
Spring, J. (2015). Economization
of education: Human capital, global corporations, skills-based schooling. New York and London: Routledge.
Veseth, M. A., & Balaam, D. N. (no
date). political economy. Encyclopedia Britannica. [URL].
Westberg, J. (2025). Historical
methods in educational research: sources, contextualisation, periodisation and
analysis. Paedagogica
Historica, 1–21.