Article In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics: Online-First Articles
Academic writing in the matrix
A posthumanist and distributed perspective
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
This paper analyses the teaching and learning of academic communication through the lenses of posthumanism and
distributed cognition and language. This is not intended as a solely philosophical exercise, but an attempt to map the factors and
actants at play in the processes of learning and teaching to communicate in academic contexts. While emergent
technologies, such as generative artificial intelligence, make this discussion particularly timely, I suggest that an expanded,
embodied lens has always been necessary to understand how students learn to communicate, how they develop knowledge, and how they
are socialised into academic disciplinary communities.
Article outline
- Introduction: Learning to communicate academically
- Digital technologies: Tools for enhancement?
- The transversal posthumanities
- Distributed language and cognition
- Sense-making, learning, writing: Embodied and distributed
- Academic communication in the matrix
- Conclusions
- AI disclosure statement
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (74)
Alnafrah, I. (2025). The
two tales of AI: A global assessment of the environmental impacts of artificial intelligence from a multidimensional policy
perspective. Journal of Environmental
Management, 392, 1–24.
Anson, D. W. J. (2024). The
impact of large language models on university students’ literacy development: A dialogue with Lea and Street’s academic
literacies framework. Higher Education Research &
Development, 43(7), 1465–1478.
Appleby, R., & Pennycook, A. (2017). Swimming
with sharks, ecological feminism and posthuman language politics. Critical Inquiry in Language
Studies, 14(2), 239–261.
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical
English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. L. Erlbaum Associates.
(2009). Theorizing
and practicing critical English for academic purposes. Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 8(2), 81–85.
Biswas Mellamphy, N. (2021). Humans
“in the loop”? Human-centrism, posthumanism, and AI. Nature and
Culture, 16(1), 11–27.
Braidotti, R., & Hlavajova, M. (2018). Introduction. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman
glossary (pp. 1–14). Bloomsbury.
Briguglio, C. (2014). Working
in the third space: Promoting interdisciplinary collaboration to embed English language development into the
disciplines. Retrieved from [URL]
Bruce, I. (2021). Towards
an EAP without borders: Developing knowledge, practitioners, and communities. International
Journal of English for Academic
Purposes, 2021, 23–36.
Choudhury, M. (2023). Generative
AI has a language problem. Nature Human
Behaviour, 7(11), 1802–1803.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2026). AI
and epistemic agency: How AI influences belief revision and its normative implications. Social
Epistemology, 40(1), 59–71.
Copson, A. (2015). What
is humanism? In A. Copson and A. C. Grayling (Eds.), The
Wiley Blackwell Handbook of
Humanism (pp. 1–33). Wiley Blackwell.
Cowley, S. J. (2019). The
return of languaging: Toward a new ecolinguistics. Chinese Semiotic
Studies, 15(4), 483–512.
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K. (2023). Leadership
is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence
(AI). Journal of University Teaching & Learning
Practice, 20(3), 1–19.
Curry, N., McEnery, T., & Brookes, G. (2025). A
question of alignment — AI, GenAI and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 45, 315–336.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A
thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Continuum.
Demuro, E., & Gurney, L. (2024). Artificial
intelligence and the ethnographic encounter: Transhuman language ontologies, or what it means “to write like a human, think
like a machine.” Language &
Communication, 96, 1–12.
(2025). Language
ontologies and the worlding of language(s)/languaging: does language create the world or does worlding create
language? Language
Sciences, 111, 1–14.
Fenton-Smith, B., Humphreys, P., & Walkinshaw, I. (2017). English
medium instruction in higher education in the Asia-Pacific: From policy to
pedagogy. Springer.
Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism,
transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: Differences and
relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A
cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition &
Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
Fox, N. J. (2024). Artificial
intelligence and the black hole of capitalism: A more-than-human political ethology. Social
Sciences, 13(10), 1–16.
Fox, N. J., & Alldred, P. (2013). The
sexuality-assemblage: Desire, affect, anti-humanism. The Sociological
Review, 61, 769–789.
(2015). New
materialist social inquiry: Designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal
of Social Research
Methodology, 18(4), 399–414.
Gaylard, R. (2004). “Welcome
to the world of our humanity”: (African) humanism, ubuntu and black South African
writing. Journal of Literary
Studies, 20(3–4), 265–282.
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI
tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical
thinking. Societies, 15(1), 1–28.
Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The
process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational
Research, 104(6), 396–407.
Gurney, L., & Busteed, S. (2026). Embedding
ChatGPT and process writing in academic writing: Benefits, drawbacks, and writer
cognition. Journal of Academic Language and
Learning, 20(3), 61–77. Retrieved
from [URL]
Gurney, L., & Demuro, E. (2023). Simultaneous
multiplicity: New materialist ontologies and the apprehension of language as assemblage and
phenomenon. Critical Inquiry in Language
Studies, 20(2), 127–149.
Harris, A. J., & Ashton, J. L. (2011). Embedding
and integrating language and academic skills: An innovative approach. Journal of Academic
Language and
Learning, 5(2), A73–A87. Retrieved
from [URL]
Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus
as performer: Toward a posthumanist culture? The Georgia
Review, 31(4), 830–850. [URL]
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2000). Distributed
cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on
Computer-Human
Interaction, 7(2), 174–196.
Hutchins, E. (2006). The
distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In S. C. Levinson & N. J. Enfield (Eds.), Roots
of human
sociality (pp. 375–398). Routledge.
Hutson, J. (2024). Rethinking
plagiarism in the era of generative AI. Journal of Intelligent
Communication, 4(1), 20–31.
Joshi, P., Santy, S., Budhiraja, A., Bali, K. & Choudhury, M. (2020). The
state and fate of linguistic diversity and inclusion in the NLP
world. In D. Jurafsky, J. Chai, N. Schluter, & J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 6282–6293).
Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X.-H., Beresnitzky, A. V., Braunstein, I., & Maes, P. (2025). Your
brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing
task. arXiv.
Kramsch, C. (2026). A
critical reflection on where applied linguistics is taking us. Language
Teaching, 1–8.
Lee, Y.-T. (2003). Daoistic
humanism in ancient China: Broadening personality and counseling theories in the 21st
century. Journal of Humanistic
Psychology, 43(1), 64–85.
Lillis, T., & Tuck, J. (2016). Academic
literacies: A critical lens on writing and reading in the
academy. In K. Hyland (Ed.), The
Routledge handbook of English for academic
purposes (pp. 30–43). Routledge.
Maldoni, A. (2017). A
cross-disciplinary approach to embedding: A pedagogy for developing academic
literacies. Journal of Academic Language and
Learning, 11(1), A104–A124. Retrieved
from [URL]
Mendz, G. L., & Cook, M. (2021). Transhumanist
genetic enhancement: Creation of a ‘new man’ through technological innovation. The New
Bioethics, 27(2), 105–126.
More, M. (2013). The
philosophy of transhumanism. In M. More & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The
transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human
future (pp. 3–17). Wiley-Blackwell.
Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages
and actor-networks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography
Compass, 9(1), 27–41.
Murray, D. M. (2003). Teach
writing as a process not product. In V. Villanueva (Ed.), (pp. 3–6). National Council of Teachers of English.
Onishi, B. B. (2011). Information,
bodies, and Heidegger: Tracing visions of the
posthuman. Sophia, 50(1), 101–112.
Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing
others’ words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL
Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230.
(1997). Vulgar
pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific
Purposes, 16(4), 253–269.
Peters, M. A. (2015). The
humanist bias in Western philosophy and education. Educational Philosophy and
Theory, 47(11), 1128–1135.
Sanz-Tejeda, A., Domínguez-Oller, J. C., Baldaquí-Escandell, J. M., Gómez-Díaz, R., & García-Rodríguez, A. (2026). The
impact of generative AI on academic reading and writing: A synthesis of recent evidence
(2023–2025). Frontiers in
Education, 10, Article 1711718.
Slamet, M., Gannaway, J., & Choi, J. (2025). ‘It
is AI-translated but not entirely … ’: Beyond-the-human meshwork in multilingual academic literacy
practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 1–21.
Slater, J., & Humphries, J. (2025). Another
reason to call bullshit on AI “hallucinations.” AI &
Society, 40(7), 5631–5632.
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google
effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our
fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778.
Steffensen, S. V. (2015). Distributed
language and dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity. Language
Sciences, 50, 105–119.
Steffensen, S. V., Döring, M., & Cowley, S. J. (2024). Ecolinguistics:
Living and languaging united. In S. V. Steffensen, M. Döring, & S. J. Cowley (Eds.), Language
as an ecological phenomenon: Languaging and bioecologies in human-environment
relationships (pp. 1–28). Bloomsbury.
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order
languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological
Psychology, 23(2), 210–245.
Toohey, K. (2019). The
onto-epistemologies of new materialism: Implications for applied linguistics pedagogies and
research. Applied
Linguistics, 40(6), 937–956.
Tsao, J., Heinrichs, D. H., & Camit, M. (2025). Artificial
intelligence and epistemic inoperability: Towards a sympoetic
approach. Discourse, 1–13.
UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on
the ethics of artificial intelligence. [URL]
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT:
Five priorities for
research. Nature, 614(7947), 224–226.
Veitch, S., & Johnson, S. (2016). Collaborating
to embed the teaching and assessment of literacy in Education: A targeted unit
approach. Journal of Academic Language and
Learning, 10(2), A1–A10. Retrieved
from [URL]