In:Phonological Schematicity in Interscandinavian Decoding: A constructionist approach
Anna Hagel
[Constructional Approaches to Language 42] 2026
► pp. 225–238
Literature
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Ainsworth, W. A. (1976). Mechanisms
of speech recognition (International Series in
Natural Philosophy, 85). Pergamon Press.
Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2019). Specificity
and generalization in perceptual adaptation to accented
speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society
of
America, 145(6), 3382–3398.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A
taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s
taxonomy of educational objectives. 2nd
edn. Longman.
Audring, J. (2019). Mothers
or sisters? The encoding of morphological
knowledge. Word
Structure, 12(3), 274–296.
Avgustinova, T., Jágrová, K., & Stenger, I. (2020). The
INCOMSLAV platform: Experimental website with integrated methods for
measuring linguistic distances and asymmetries in receptive
multilingualism. In J. Fiumara, C. Cieri, M. Liberman & C. Callison-Burch (Eds.), Proceedings
of the LREC 2020 Workshop on ‘Citizen Linguistics in Language Resource
Development’ (pp. 40–48). European Language Resources Association.
Baayen, R. H. (2009). Corpus
linguistics in morphology: Morphological
productivity. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus
linguistics, 2 (Handbooks
of Linguistics and Communication Science,
29) (pp. 899–919). De Gruyter.
Babel, A., & S. Pfänder. (2014). Doing
copying: Why typology doesn’t matter to language
speakers. In J. Besters-Dilger, C. Dermarkar, S. Pfänder & A. Rabus (Eds.), Congruence
in contact-induced language
change (pp. 239–257). De Gruyter.
Bacquin, M., & R. Zola Christensen. Dansk
og svensk: Fra nabosprog til
fremmedsprog? Sprog i
Norden, 2013, 67–82.
Bannert, R. (1981). Referat
av diskussionen i sektionen Talperceptionsforskning och nordisk
hörförståelse. In C.-C. Elert (Ed.), Internordisk
språkförståelse: Föredrag och diskussioner vid ett symposium på
Rungstedgaard utanför Köpenhamn den 24−26 mars 1980, anordnat av
sekretariatet för nordiskt kulturellt samarbete vid Nordiska
ministerrådet (pp. 37–45). Universitetet i Umeå.
Barber, A. (2009). Type/Token. In S. Chapman & C. Routledge (Eds.), Key
ideas in linguistics and the philosophy of
language (pp. 246–247). Edinburgh University Press.
Barðdal, J. (2008). Productivity:
Evidence from case and argument structure in
Icelandic (Constructional Approaches to Language,
8). John Benjamins.
Barfod, S. (2019). Interskandinaviske
interaktioner i et historisk og nutidigt
perspektiv. Globe: A Journal of Language,
Culture and
Communication, 8, 34–56.
Bartón, K. (2023). MuMIn:
Multi-Model Inference. R package version
1.47.5. 〈[URL]; accessed 17-7-2024〉.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting
linear mixed-effects models using
lme4. Journal of Statistical
Software, 67(1), 1–48.
Beerkens, R. (2010). Receptive
multilingualism as a language mode in the Dutch-German border
area. (Zivilgesellschaftliche Verständigungsprozesse
vom 19. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart,
4). Waxmann.
Behrens, H. (2020). From
grammatical categories to processes of
categorization. In C. F. Rowland, A. L. Theakston, B. Ambridge & K. E. Twomey (Eds.), Current
Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition (Trends
in Language Acquisition
Research) (pp. 91–112). John Benjamins.
Berthele, R. (2011). On
abduction in receptive multilingualism: Evidence from cognate guessing
tasks. Applied Linguistics
Review, 2(2011), 191–220.
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination
of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the
listener’s native phonological system. The
Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 109(2), 775–794.
Bjørn, B., & C. Stenrøs. (2014). Blandinavisk:
Et sprogpsykologisk studie i akkommodation, holdninger og identitet på en
skandinavisk arbejdsplads. Københavns Universitet [Master’s
thesis].
Bø, I. (1978). Ungdom
og naboland. En undersøkelse av skolens og fjernsynets betydning for
nabospråkforståelsen (Rogalandsforskning,
4). Rogalandsforskning.
Börestam Uhlmann, U. (1997). Utblick
för inblick: Några aspekter på grannspråkskommunikation i teori och
praktik. Nordisk tidskrift för vetenskap,
konst och
industri, 73, 239–254.
Børne- og
undervisningsministeriet. (2019). Dansk.
Faghæfte 2019. 〈[URL]; accessed 23-03-2024〉.
Booij, G. (2016). Construction
Morphology. In A. Hippisley & G. Stump (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of
morphology (pp. 424–448). Cambridge University Press.
Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2016). Forschungsmethoden
und Evaluation in den Sozial- und
Humanwissenschaften. 5th
edn. Springer.
Bosma, E., Blom, E., Hoekstra, E., & Versloot, A. (2019). A
longitudinal study on the gradual cognate facilitation effect in bilingual
children’s Frisian receptive
vocabulary. International Journal of
Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 22(4), 371–385.
Boye, K. (2023). Grammaticalization
as conventionalization of discursively secondary status. Deconstructing the
lexical–grammatical continuum. Transactions
of the Philological
Society, 121(2), 270–292.
Branets, A., Bahtina, D., & Verschik, A. (2020). Mediated
receptive multilingualism: Estonian-Russian-Ukrainian case
study. Linguistic Approaches to
Bilingualism, 10(3), 380–411.
Braunmüller, K. (1995). Semikommunikation
und semiotische Strategien: Bausteine zu einem Modell für die Verständigung
im Norden zur Zeit der
Hanse. In K. Braunmüller (Ed.), Niederdeutsch
und die skandinavischen
Sprachen. Vol. 2 (Sprachgeschichte,
4) (pp. 35–70). Winter.
(2002). Semicommunication
and accommodation: Observations from the linguistic situation in
Scandinavia. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 12, 1–23.
(2006). Vorbild
Skandinavien: Zur Relevanz der rezeptiven Mehrsprachigkeit in
Europa. In K. Ehlich & A. Hornung (Eds.), Praxen
der Mehrsprachigkeit (Mehrsprachigkeit,
20) (pp. 11–29). Waxmann.
(2007). Receptive
multilingualism in Northern Europe in the Middle Ages: A description of a
scenario. In J. D. ten Thije & L. Zeevaert (Eds.), Receptive
Multilingualism: Linguistic analyses, language policies and didactic
concepts (Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism,
6) (pp. 25–47). John Benjamins.
(2008). On
the relevance of receptive multilingualism in a globalised world: Theory,
history and evidence from today’s
Scandinavia (Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit, Folge B,
90). Universität Hamburg, Sonderforschungsgebiet Mehrsprachigkeit.
Braunmüller, K., & Zeevaert, L. (2001). Semikommunikation,
rezeptive Mehrsprachigkeit und verwandte Phänomene: Eine bibliographische
Bestandsaufnahme (Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit,
Folge B, 19). Universität Hamburg, Sonderforschungsgebiet Mehrsprachigkeit.
Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P. & Keuleers, E. (2018). The
word frequency effect in word processing: An updated
review. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 27(1), 45–50.
Bybee, J. L. (2006). From
usage to grammar: The mind’s response to
repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733.
(2013). Usage-based
theory and exemplar representations of
constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of construction
grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford University Press.
Casenhiser, D., & Goldberg, A. (2005). Fast
mapping between a phrasal form and
meaning. Developmental
Science, 8(6), 500–508.
Chan, T. M. V., & Alain, C. (2019). Listening
back in time: Does attention to memory facilitate word-in-noise
identification? Attention, Perception &
Psychophysics, 81(1), 253–269.
Conklin, K., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Using
eye-tracking in applied linguistics and second language
research. Second Language
Research, 32(3), 453–467.
Corder, P. (1967). The
significance of learner’s
errors. International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 5(1–4), 161–170.
Crespo, K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2022). The
role of attention, language ability, and language experience in children’s
artificial grammar learning. Journal of
speech, language, and hearing
research, 65(4), 1574–1591.
Culbertson, J., & Schuler, K. (2019). Artificial
language learning in children. Annual Review
of
Linguistics, 5(1), 353–373.
Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, J. (1999). The
view from the periphery: The English comparative
correlative. Linguistic
Inquiry, 30(4), 543–571.
Dąbrowska, E. (2015). Individual
differences in grammatical
knowledge. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook
of Cognitive Linguistics (Handbooks of Linguistics
and Communication Science,
39) (pp. 650–668). De Gruyter.
Davis, S., & Tsujimura, N. (2018). Arabic
nonconcatenative morphology in construction
morphology. In G. Booij (Ed.), The
construction of words: Advances in construction
morphology (Studies in Morphology,
4) (pp. 315–339). Springer.
Delsing, L.-O., & Lundin Åkesson, K. (2005). Håller
språket ihop Norden? En forskningsrapport om ungdomars förståelse av danska,
svenska och norska. Nordiska ministerrådet.
Delsing, L.-O., & Kärrlander, E. (2002). The
Öresund bridge project: Swedish-Danish
intercomprehension. In G. Kischel (Ed.), Eurocom:
Mehrsprachiges Europa durch Interkomprehension in Sprachfamilien.
Tagungsband des internationales Fachkongresses im Europäischen Jahr der
Sprachen 2001, Hagen, 9.-10. November
2001 (pp. 255–265). FernUniversität Hagen.
Department for Uddannelse, Kultur,
Idræt og Kirke/Ilinniartitaanermut, Kultureqarnermut, Timersornermut
Ilageeqarnermullu
Naalakkersuisoqarfik. (2023). Selvstyrets
lovbekendtgørelse af Inatsisartutlov om folkeskolen. 〈[URL]; accessed 23-03-2024〉.
Dideriksen, C., Christiansen, M. H., Dingemanse, M., Højmark-Bertelsen, M., Johansson, C., Tylén, K., & Fusaroli, R. (2023). Language-specific
constraints on conversation: Evidence from Danish and
Norwegian. Cognitive
Science, 47(11), e13387.
Diessel, H. (2019). The
grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language
use. Cambridge University Press.
(2023). The
constructicon: Taxonomies and networks (Elements in
Construction Grammar). Cambridge University Press.
Diewald, G. (2020). Paradigms
lost — paradigms regained: Paradigms as
hyper-constructions. In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in diachronic construction
grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language,
27) (pp. 277–315). John Benjamins.
Divjak, D., & Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2019). Frequency
and
entrenchment. In E. Dąbrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Cognitive
linguistics: Foundations of
language (pp. 61–86) De Gruyter.
Doetjes, G. (2010). Akkommodation
und Sprachverstehen in der interskandinavischen
Kommunikation. Universität Hamburg [dissertation].
Doetjes, G., & Gooskens, C. (2009). Skriftsprogets
rolle i den dansk-svenske
talesprogsforståelse. Språk och
stil, 19, 105–123.
Dumay, N., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Content, A. (2002). The
role of the syllable in lexical segmentation in French: Word-spotting
data. Brain and
language, 81(1–3), 144–161.
Fillmore, C. J. (1988). The
mechanisms of ‘Construction
Grammar’. Berlekely Linguistics
Society, 14, 35–55.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity
and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let
alone’. Language, 64(3), 501–538.
Fried, M. (2015). Construction
Grammar. In T. Kiss & A. Alexiadou (Eds.), Syntax:
Theory and
analysis. Vol. 2 (Handbooks
of Linguistics and Communication Science,
42) (pp. 974–1003). De Gruyter.
Frost, R. L., & Monaghan, P. (2020). Insights
from studying statistical
learning. In C. F. Rowland, A. L. Theakston, B. Ambridge & K. E. Twomey (Eds.), Current
perspectives on child language acquisition: How children use their
environment to learn (Trends in Language Acquisition
Research,
27) (pp. 65–89). John Benjamins.
Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2003). Lexical
competition and the acquisition of novel
words. Cognition, 89(2), 105–132.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions
at work: The nature of generalization in
language. Oxford University Press.
(2019). Explain
me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of
constructions. Princeton University Press.
Goll, S. (2025). Südschleswigdänisch:
Eine strukturelle Bestandsaufnahme aus dialektologischer
Perspektive. Universitätsverlag Kiel [dissertation].
Gooskens, C. (2006). Linguistic
and extra-linguistic predictors of inter-Scandinavian
intelligibility. Linguistics in the
Netherlands, 2006, 101–113.
(2020). The
North Germanic dialect
continuum. In M. T. Putnam & B. R. Page (Eds.), The
Cambridge Handbook of Germanic
Linguistics (pp. 761–782). Cambridge University Press.
Gooskens, C., van Heuven, V. J., van Bezooijen, R., & Pacilly, J. J. A. (2010). Is
spoken Danish less intelligible than
Swedish? Speech
Communication, 52(11–12), 1022–1037.
Gooskens, C., Heeringa, W., & Beijering, K. (2008). Phonetic
and lexical predictors of
intelligibility. International Journal of
Humanities and Arts
Computing, 2(1–2), 63–81.
Gooskens, C., & Kürschner, S. (2010). Hvilken
indflydelse har danske stød og svenske ordaccenter på den dansk-svenske
ordforståelse? In C. Falk, A. Nord & R. Palm (Eds.), Svenskans
beskrivning 30: Förhandlingar vid Trettionde sammankomsten för svenskans
beskrivning, Stockholm den 10 och 11 oktober
2008 (pp. 82–91). Institutionen för nordiska språk, Stockholms universitet.
Gooskens, C., & van Bezooijen, R. (2013). Explaining
Danish-Swedish asymmetric word intelligibility: An error
analysis. In C. Gooskens & R. van Bezooijen (Eds.), Phonetics
in Europe: Perception and
production (pp. 59–82). Peter Lang
Gregersen, F. (2003). Factors
influencing the linguistic development in the Øresund
region. International Journal of the
Sociology of
Language, 2003(159), 139–152.
Grey, S. (2020). What
can artificial languages reveal about morphosyntactic processing in
bilinguals? Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition, 23(1), 81–86.
Grosjean, F. (1995). A
psycholinguistic approach to code-switching: The recognition of guest words
by
bilinguals. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One
speaker, two
languages (pp. 259–275) Cambridge University Press.
(2001). The
bilingual’s language
modes. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One
mind, two languages: Bilingual language
processing (pp. 1–22). Blackwell.
Grünbaum, C., & Reuter, M. (2013). Att
förstå varandra i Norden. Språkråd till nordbor i nordiskt
samarbete. Nordiska ministerrådet.
Hagel, A. (2020). Strange
sounds, familiar words: Interlingual decoding from a CxG
perspective. Belgian Journal of
Linguistics, 34, 122–134.
(2023). One
man’s [ɕœtː] is another man’s
[kʰøð̞]. In E. Coussé, S. Höder, B. Lyngfelt & J. Prentice (Eds.), Constructional
approaches to Nordic languages (Constructional
Approaches to Language,
37) (pp. 55–80). John Benjamins.
(2025). Schemas
all the way down? Exploring the notion of intra-word phonological
schematicity in intercommunicative
decoding. In H. C. Boas & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions
in contact 3. Constructional schemas and patterns in
contact (Constructional Approaches to Language,
40) (pp. 291–317). John Benjamins.
Harpe, S. E. (2015). How
to analyze Likert and other rating scale
data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and
Learning, 7(6), 836–850.
Harrell Jr., F. E. (2024). Hmisc:
Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version
5.1-2. 〈[URL]; accessed 17-07-2024〉.
Hartig, F. (2022). DHARMa:
Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression
models. R package version
0.4.6. 〈[URL]; accessed 17-07-2024〉.
Hasselborn, M. & Gold, A. (2013). Pädagogische
Psychologie: Erfolgreiches Lernen und Lehren. 3rd
edn. Kohlhammer Verlag.
Haugen, E. (1953). Nordiske
språkproblemer: En
opinionsundersökelse. Nordisk tidskrift för
vetenskap, konst och
industri, 29, 225–249.
Helgason, P., & Ringen, C. (2008). Voicing
and aspiration in Swedish stops. Journal of
Phonetics, 36(4), 607–628.
Hemstad, R., Møller, F., & Thorkildsen, D. (2018). Skandinavismen
som visjon og
påvirkningskraft. In R. Hemstad, F. Møller & D. Thorkildsen (Eds.), Skandinavismen:
Vision og
virkning (pp. 9–20). Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Henningsen-Schomers, M. R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2022). Modelling
concrete and abstract concepts using brain-constrained deep neural
networks. Psychological
Research, 86(8), 2533–2559.
van Heuven, V. J. (2008). Making
sense of strange sounds: (Mutual) intelligibility of related language
varieties. A review. International Journal of
Humanities and Arts
Computing, 2(1–2), 39–62.
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction
grammar and its application to
English. Edinburgh University Press.
(2019). Higher-order
schemas in morphology: What they are, how they work, and where to find
them. Word
Structure, 12(3), 261–273.
Hilpert, M., & Flach, S. (2023). Modals
in the network model of Construction
Grammar. In I. Depraetere, B. Cappelle, M. Hilpert, L. De Cuypere, M. Dehouck, P. Denis, S. Flach, N. Grabar, C. Grandin, T. Hamon, C. Hufeld, B. Leclercq & H.-J. Schmid (Eds.), Models
of Modals: From Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics to Machine
Learning (pp. 254–270). De Gruyter.
Höder, S. (2014). Phonological
elements and Diasystematic Construction
Grammar. Constructions and
Frames, 6(2), 202–231.
(2016a). Dänische
Phonetik im Kontrast zu norddeutschen Ausgangsvarietäten beim schulischen
Zweitspracherwerb. Kieler Arbeiten zur
skandinavistischen
Linguistik, 1.
(2018). Grammar
is community-specific: Background and basic concepts of Diasystematic
Construction
Grammar. In H. C. Boas & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions
in contact. Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic
languages (Constructional Approaches to Language,
24) (pp. 37–70). John Benjamins.
(2019). Phonological
schematicity in multilingual constructions: A diasystematic perspective on
lexical form. Word
Structure, 12(3), 334–352.
(2024). The
impact of language contact on North
Germanic. In S. Kürschner & A. Dammel (Eds.), The
Oxford encyclopedia of Germanic
Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Höder, S., Prentice, J., & Tingsell, S. (2021). Additional
language acquisition as emerging
multilingualism. In H. C. Boas & S. Höder (Eds.), Constructions
in contact 2: Language change, multilingual practices, and additional
language acquisition (Constructional Approaches to
Language,
30) (pp. 310–337). John Benjamins.
Høeg, A. T. (2018). En
eksperimentel undersøgelse af svenskeres opfattelse og forståelse af dansk
udtale. Uppsala Universitet [BA
thesis].
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.) (2013). The
Oxford handbook of construction
grammar. Oxford University Press.
Holmes, B. C., & Putnam, M. T. (2020). Mental
representations in receptive
multilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to
Bilingualism, 10(3), 309–314.
Horneman Hansen, L. (2020). När
30 blir tolv: Vad är egentligen svårt i danskt uttal för svenskspråkiga? Ett
experiment med svenskspråkigas igenkänning av ord med danskt
uttal. In U. Tornberg, M. Thegel & H. Henryson (Eds.), Språkdidaktik
i praktiken: Metoder, exempel och reflektioner från
högskolenivå (Skrifter utgivna av Institutionen för
nordiska språk vid Uppsala universitet,
103) (pp. 91–122). Uppsala universitet.
Houwer, J. de, & S. Hughes. (2020). The
psychology of learning: An introduction from a functional-cognitive
perspective. The MIT Press.
Ibbotson, P. (2020). What
it takes to talk: Exploring developmental cognitive
linguistics (Cognitive Linguistics Research,
64). De Gruyter.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations
of language: Brain, meaning, grammar,
evolution. Oxford University Press.
Jackendoff, R., & J. Audring. (2019). The
Parallel
Architecture. In A. Kertész, E. Moravcsik & C. Rákosi (Eds.), Current
approaches to
syntax (pp. 215–240). De Gruyter.
. (2020). The
texture of the lexicon: Relational morphology and the parallel
architecture. Oxford University Press.
Jacobsen, B. (2003). Colonial
Danish. International Journal of the
Sociology of
Language, 2003(159), 153–164.
(2021). Grønland. In E. Hjorth, H. Galberg Jacobsen, B. Jørgensen, B. Jacobsen, & L. Kristian Fahl (Eds.), Dansk
sproghistorie. Vol. 5: Dansk i
samspil, (pp. 61–74). Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Järvinen, S. (2021). ‘Ajatelkaa
se ensimmäinen aamu kun tietää että hela veckan är framför oss ja mennä
syömään frukostia’: Kodväxlingens grammatik i en svenskfinsk
familj. Göteborgs universitet [Master’s
thesis].
Järvinen, S., & Lyngfelt, B. (2024). ‘Suomessa
på grund av corona niillä on visiiri kaikilla’: En konstruktionsgrammatisk
analys av kodväxling mellan finska och
svenska. In D. Jansson, I. Melander, G. Westberg & D. Y. Falk (Eds.), Svenskans
beskrivning. Förhandlingar vid trettioåttonde sammankomsten, Örebro 4–6 maj
2022, Vol.
1 (pp. 272–289). Örebro universitet.
Johnson, K. (1997). Speech
perception without speaker
normalization. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker
variability in speech
processing (pp. 145–165). Academic Press.
Kaduk, T., Goeke, C., Finger, H., & König, P. (2023). Webcam
eye tracking close to laboratory standards: Comparing a new webcam-based
system and the EyeLink 1000. Behavior
research methods. 〈[URL]; accessed 23-06-2024〉.
Klatt, D. H. (1979). Speech
perception: A model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical
access. Journal of
Phonetics, 7(3), 279–312.
Klein, H. G., & Stegmann, T. D. (2000). EuroComRom
− Die sieben Siebe: Romanische Sprachen sofort lesen
können (Editiones EuroCom,
1). 3rd
edn. Shaker.
Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2006). Generalization
in perceptual learning for
speech. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review, 13(2), 262–268.
Kühl, K. (2015). Faroe
Danish. In E. Torgersen, S. Hårstad, B. Mæhlum & U. Røyneland (Eds.), Language
Variation — European Perspectives V: Selected papers from the Seventh
International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 7),
Trondheim, June 2013 (Studies in Language Variation,
17) (pp. 157–168). John Benjamins.
Kürschner, S., Gooskens, C., & van Bezooijen, R. (2008). Linguistic
Determinants of the Intelligibility of Swedish Words among
Danes. International Journal of Humanities
and Arts
Computing, 2(1–2), 83–100.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations
of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical
prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Lassen, K. (2017). Interskamdinavisk.
En undersøgelse af den norske ungdomsserie SKAMs indflydelse på danske
sprogbrugeres norske
sprogforståelse. Aarhus Universitet [dissertation].
Leclercq, B., & C. Morin. (2025). The
meaning of constructions (Elements in Construction
Grammar). Cambridge University Press.
Leinenger, M. (2014). Phonological
coding during reading. Psychological
Bulletin, 140(6), 1534–1555.
Leino, J. (2022). Formalizing
paradigms in Construction
Grammar. In G. Diewald & K. Politt (Eds.), Paradigms
regained: Theoretical and empirical arguments for the reassessment of the
notion of paradigm (Empirically Oriented Theoretical
Morphology and Syntax,
10) (pp. 37–65). Language Science Press.
Leino, J., & Östman, J.-O. (2005). Constructions and variability. In M. Fried & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Grammatical
constructions: Back to the roots (Constructional
Approaches to Language,
4) (pp. 199–222). John Benjamins.
Levshina, N. (2015). How
to do Linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical
analysis. John Benjamins.
Lieven, E. (2010). Input
and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of
frequency. Lingua, 120(11), 2546–2556.
Lobmeier, J. H. (2010). Nonexperimental
Designs. In J. H. Lobmeier (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of Research
Design (pp. 911–914). SAGE Publications. 〈; accessed 27-06-2024〉.
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing
spoken words: The neighbourhood activation
model. Ear &
Hearing, 19, 1–36.
Lüdecke, D. (2023). sjPlot:
Data Visualization for Statistics in Social
Science. R package version
2.8.15. 〈[URL]; accessed 17-07-2024〉.
Lundin, K., & Zola Christensen, R. (2001). Grannspråksförståelse
i Öresundsregionen år 2000: Gymnasisters
läsförståelse (Nordlund,
22:1). Lunds universitet.
Madlener, K. (2015). Frequency
effects in instructed second language
acquisition (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics,
29). De Gruyter.
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Zwitserlood, P. (1989). Accessing
spoken words: The importance of word
onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Human Perception and
Performance, 15(3), 576–585.
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame:
An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social
sciences. Behavior Research
Methods, 44(2), 314–324.
Matras, Y., & Sakel, J. (2007). Investigating
the mechanisms of pattern replication in language
convergence. Studies in
Language, 31(4), 829–865.
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012). Speech
recognition in adverse conditions: A
review. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 27(7–8), 953–978.
Mattys, S. L., White, L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2005). Integration
of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical
framework. Journal of Experimental
Psychology.
General, 134(4), 477–500.
Maurud, Ø. (1976). Nabospråksforståelse
i Skandinavia: En undersøkelse om gjensidig forståelse av tale- og
skriftspråk i Danmark, Norge og
Sverige (Nordisk utredningsserie,
1976(13)). Nordiska rådet [dissertation].
Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The
weckud wetch of the wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel
accent. Cognitive
Science, 32(3), 543–562.
McGregor, W. B., Boye Niemelä, J., & Bakken Jepsen, J. (2015). Danish
Sign
Language. In J. Bakken Jepsen, G. de Clerck, S. Lutalo-Kiingi & W. B. McGregor (Eds.), Sign
languages of the world: A comparative
handbook (pp. 195–233). De Gruyter.
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The
TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive
Psychology, 18(1), 1–86.
McQueen, J. M. (1998). Segmentation
of continuous speech using
phonotactics. Journal of Memory and
Language, 39, 21–46.
Mennta- og
Menningarmálaráðuneytið. (2013). Aðalnámskrá
grunnskóla: Almennur hluti 2011, greinasvið
2013. Mennta- og Menningarmálaráðuneytið.
Möller, R. (2011). Wann
sind Kognaten erkennbar? Ähnlichkeit und synchrone Transparenz von
Kognatenbeziehungen in der germanischen
Interkomprehension. Linguistik
Online, 46(2).
Möller, R., & Zeevaert, L. (2015). Investigating
word recognition in intercomprehension: Methods and
findings. Linguistics, 53(2), 13–52.
Moreno, M. A., & van Orden, G. C. (2001). Word
Recognition, Cognitive Psychology
of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International
Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral
Sciences, 16556–16561. Elsevier.
Morin, C. (2025). Are
phonemes constructions? A plea for distinguishing function and
meaning. Constructions and
Frames (Online-first
articles), 1–27.
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Processing
time, accent, and comprehensibility in the perception of native and
foreign-accented speech. Language and
Speech, 38(3), 289–306.
Nelson, M. (2016). Språksituationen
på Åland: Speciell, om inte
unik. In I. Haag (Ed.), Litteratur
och Språk
11 (pp. 157–170). Mälardalens högskola.
Nordiska ministerrådet/nordisk
ministerråd. (2024). Deklaration
om nordisk sprogpolitik (Politiknord,
2024:710). Nordisk ministerråd.
Nordiska ministerrådet &
Nordiska
rådet. (2018). Helsingforsavtalet.
Samarbetsöverenskommelse mellan Danmark, Finland, Island, Norge och
Sverige. Nordiska ministerrådet.
Øresundsbro
Konsortiet. (2018). The Øresund
Bridge and its region: 18 years. 〈[URL]; accessed 23-03-2024〉.
Östman, J.-O. (2011). Language
contact in the North of
Europe. In B. Kortmann & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The
languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive
guide (The World of Linguistics,
1) (pp. 359–380). De Gruyter.
Olofsson, J. (2019). Frekvens
som mått på produktivitet: En konstruktionsgrammatisk undersökning av
förflyttningskonstruktioner i svenskan. Språk
&
Stil, 29, 168–202.
Palacios, A., & Pfänder, S. (2014). Similarity
effects in language
contact. In J. Besters-Dilger, C. Dermarkar, S. Pfänder & A. Rabus (Eds.), Congruence
in contact-induced language
change (pp. 219–238). De Gruyter.
Perek, F. (2020). Productivity
and schematicity in constructional
change. In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in diachronic construction
grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language,
27) (pp. 141–166). John Benjamins.
Perek, F., & Goldberg, A. E. (2015). Generalizing
beyond the input: The functions of the constructions
matter. Journal of Memory and
Language, 84, 108–127.
Petersen, H. P. (2010). The
dynamics of Faroese-Danish language
contact (Germanistische Bibliothek,
37). Winter.
Pfänder, S., & Behrens, H. (2016). Experience
counts: An introduction to frequency effects in
language. In H. Behrens & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Experience
counts: Frequency effects in language (Linguae &
Litterae,
54) (pp. 1–20). De Gruyter.
Pietsch, L. (2005). ‘Some
do and some doesn’t’: Verbal concord variation in the north of the British
Isles. In B. Kortmann, T. Herrmann, L. Pietsch & S. Wagner (Eds.), A
Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects. Vol. 1: Agreement, Gender,
Relative Clauses (Topics in English Linguistics,
50(1)) (pp. 125–210). De Gruyter.
Pirttinen, E. (2022). ‘Forstår
du mit danske?’ Internordisk kommunikation i tv-serien
Bron/Broen. Helsingfors universitet [Master’s
thesis].
Puggaard-Rode, R. (2024). International
og dansk praksis i notationen af
lukkelyde. Nydanske
Sprogstudier, 1(66), 180–215.
Pulvermüller, F. (1996). Hebb’s
concept of cell assemblies and the psychophysiology of word
processing. Psychophysiology, 33(4), 317–333.
Pulvermüller, F., Cappelle, B., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Brain
basis of meaning, words, constructions, and
grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of construction
grammar, (pp. 397–416). Oxford University Press.
Van Puyvelde, M., Rosseel, L., Zenner, E., & Speelman, D. (2025). Laboratory
studies on artificial sociolinguistic language learning: A PRISMA systematic
review. Taal en
Tongval, 77(1), 8–41.
Reddy, D. R., Erdman, L. D., & Neely, R. B. (1973). A
model and a system for machine recognition of
speech. IEEE Transactions on Audio and
Electroacoustics, 21(3), 229–238.
Rehbein, J., Thije, J. D. ten, & Verschik, A. (2012). Lingua
receptiva (LaRa): Remarks on the quintessence of receptive
multilingualism. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 16(3), 248–264.
Rogers, J., & Révész, A. (2020). Experimental
and quasi-experimental
designs. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of research methods in applied
linguistics (pp. 133–143). Routledge.
Roll, M. (2022). The
predictive function of Swedish word
accents. Frontiers in
Psychology, 13, 910787.
Romney, A., Harrison, J. T., & Benson, S. (2024). Looking
back to predict the future: A review of empirical support for the
self-fulfilling prophecy. Management Research
Review, 47(2), 245–260.
Samuel, A. G., & Sumner, M. (2012). Current
directions in research in spoken word
recognition. In M. J. Spivey, M. Joanisse & K. McRae (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook of
psycholinguistics (pp. 61–75). Cambridge University Press.
Saturno, J. (2023). The
impact of interlingual correspondences on cognate recognition in Slavic
intercomprehension. Russian
Linguistics, 47(2), 209–229.
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing
the abstractness of children’s linguistic representations: Lexical and
structural priming of syntactic constructions in young
children. Developmental
Science, 6(5), 557–567.
Schäfer, L., Leser, S., & Cysouw, M. (2016). Imitating
closely related
varieties. In M.-H. Côté, R. Knooihuizen & J. Nerbonne (Eds.), The
future of dialects: Selected papers from Methods in Dialectology
XV (Language Variation,
1) (pp. 245–260). Language Science Press.
Schmid, H.-J. (2015). A
blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization
Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive
Linguistics
Association, 3(1), 3–25.
(2020). The
dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and
entrenchment. Oxford University Press.
Schüppert, A., Gooskens, C., Hilton, N. H., & van Heuven, V. (2012). Stavelsebortfall
i modern danska. Danske
Talesprog, 12, 151–182.
Schüppert, A., Hilton, N. H., & Gooskens, C. (2015a). Swedish
is beautiful, Danish is ugly? Investigating the link between language
attitudes and spoken word
recognition. Linguistics, 53(2), 375–403.
(2016). Why
is Danish so difficult to understand for fellow
Scandinavians? Speech
Communication, 79, 47–60.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The
mathematical theory of
communication. University of Illinois Press.
Sherkina-Lieber, M. (2020). A
classification of receptive bilinguals: Why we need to distinguish them, and
what they have in common. Linguistic
Approaches to
Bilingualism, 10(3), 412–440.
Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual
learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented
speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society
of
America, 125(5), 3306–3316.
Skjold Frøshaug, A., & Stende, T. (2021). Does
the Nordic language community exist? Nordic Council of Ministers.
Skolverket. (2022). Läroplan
för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet
2022. 〈[URL]; accessed 23-03-2024〉.
Smirnova, E. & Sommerer, L. (2020). Introduction. In L. Sommerer & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Nodes
and networks in diachronic construction
grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language
volume,
27) (pp. 1–42). John Benjamins.
Stenberg-Sirén, J. (2018). Språk
och språkideologier i radio och tv: Standardspråk och språkstandarder i
finlandssvenska radio- och tv-nyheter (Nordica
Helsingiensia, 50). Helsingfors universitet.
Strandberg, J. A. E. (2022). Phonetic
and lexical variation in
Finland-Swedish. University of Groningen [dissertation].
Suttle, L., & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). The
partial productivity of constructions as
induction. Linguistics, 49, 1237–1269.
Taylor, J. R. (2012). The
mental corpus: How language is represented in the
mind. Oxford University Press.
Teleman, U. (1980). Om
den dansk-svenska hörförståelsens
betingelser. Nysvenska
studier, 59/60, 268–280.
(2001). Öresundsspråk? In P. Jarvad, F. Gregersen, L. Heltoft, J. Lund & O. Togeby (Eds.), Sproglige
åbninger. E som Erik, H som 70. Festskrift til Erik Hansen 18. september
2001 (pp. 23–33). Hans Reitzel.
ten Thije, J. D. (2019). Receptive
multilingualism. In D. Singleton & L. Aronin (Eds.), Twelve
lectures on
multilingualism (pp. 329–364). Blue Ridge Summit.
Thomson, R. (2018). Measurement
of accentedness, intelligibility, and
comprehensibility. In O. Kang & A. Ginther (Eds.), Assessment
in second language
pronunciation (pp. 11–29). Routledge.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing
a language: A usage-based theory of language
acquisition. Harvard University Press.
(2015). The
usage-based theory of language
acquisition. In E. L. Bavin & L. R. Naigles (Eds.), The
Cambridge Handbook of Child
Language (pp. 89–106). Cambridge University Press.
Torp, A. (2004). Nordiske
sprog i fortid og
nutid. In I. S. Sletten (Ed.), Nordens
sprog med rødder og fødder (Nord,
2004(10)) (pp. 19–74). Nordiska ministerrådet.
Townend, M. (2002). Language
and history in Viking age England: Linguistic relations between speakers of
Old Norse and Old English (Studies in the Early
Middle Ages,
6). Brepols.
Trofimovich, P. & McDonough, K. (2011). Using
priming methods to study L2 learning and
teaching. In P. Trofimovich & K. McDonough (Eds.), Applying
priming methods to L2 learning, teaching and
research (Language Learning & Language Teaching,
30) (pp. 1–17). John Benjamins.
Ungerer, T. (2024). Vertical
and horizontal links in constructional
networks. Constructions and
Frames, 16(1), 30–63.
Utbildningsstyrelsen/Opetushallitus. (2023). Grunderna
för läroplanen för den grundläggande utbildningen
2014. 〈[URL]; accessed 23-03-2024〉.
Utdanningsdirektoratet. (2020). Læreplan
i norsk. 〈[URL]; accessed 23-03-2024〉.
Vanhove, J. (2016). The
early learning of interlingual correspondence rules in receptive
multilingualism. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 20(5), 580–593.
Vanhove, J. & Berthele, R. (2015). The
lifespan development of cognate guessing skills in an unknown related
language. International Review of Applied
Linguistics in Language
Teaching, 53(1), 1–38.
Verschik, A. (2012). Practising
receptive multilingualism: Estonian–Finnish communication in
Tallinn. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 16(3), 265–286.
Vikør, L. (2006). Scandinavia. In U. Ammon, A. Burkhardt, G. Ungeheuer, H. E. Wiegand, H. Steger & K. Brinker (Eds.), Sociolinguistics:
An international handbook of the science of language and
society. Vol. 3. 2nd
edn. (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication
Science,
3) (pp. 1747–1754). De Gruyter.
Warter, P. (2001). Lexical
identification and decoding strategies in Interscandinavian
communication (Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit, Folge
B, 21). Universität Hamburg, Sonderforschungsbereich Mehrsprachigkeit.
Weinreich, U. (1954). Is
a structural dialectology possible? Word
(Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New
York), 10, 388–400.
Weiss, D. J. (2020). Introduction:
The use of artificial languages in bilingualism
research. Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition, 23(1), 72–73.
Willoughby, M. T., Camerota, M., King, K. M., Nduku, T., & Piper, B. (2023). Leveraging
item-level accuracy and reaction time to address ceiling effects in the
measurement of inhibitory control in preschool-aged
children. Frontiers in
Psychology, 14, 861441.
Wolff, H. (1959). Intelligibility
and inter-ethnic attitudes. Anthropological
Linguistics, 1(3), 34–41.
Wonnacott, E., Newport, E. L., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Acquiring
and processing verb argument structure: Distributional learning in a
miniature language. Cognitive
Psychology, 56(3), 165–209.
Zeevaert, L. (2004). Interskandinavische
Kommunikation: Strategien zur Etablierung von Verständigung zwischen
Skandinaviern im Diskurs (Schriftenreihe Philologia,
64). Kovač.