Cover not available

In:Personification in Language and Thought: Conceptual models, lexicogrammatical structures, and distributional patterns in Hungarian
Gábor Simon
[Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 27] 2026
► pp. 253–261

References

This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Alderson-Day, B., Woods, A., Moseley, P., Common, S., Deamer, F., Dodgson, G., & Fernyhough, C. (2020). Voice-hearing and personification: Characterising social qualities of auditory verbal hallucinations in early psychosis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allen, K. (2007). The Western Classical Tradition in Linguistics. Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andor, J. (2005). Cognitive Grammar: the state of the art and related issues: an interview with Ronald Langacker. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 52(4), 341–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Argamon, S. E. (2019). Register in computational language research. Register Studies, 1(1), 100–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M. & Zeschel, A. (2010). Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5, 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Artstein, R. (2017). Inter-annotator Agreement. In N. Ide & J. Pustejovsky, James (Eds.), Handbook of Linguistic Annotation (pp. 297–313). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Artstein, R. & Poesio, M. (2008). Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4), 555–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bajzát, T. B. (2023). Fly, fly little Comet! Exploring Subtoken-Level Metaphorical Patterns in Finnish and Hungarian Texts. New Results from the FiHuComet Corpus. In Proceedings of the Joint 3rd International Conference on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities and 8th International Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Uralic Languages (pp. 114–119). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basso, K. H. (1967). Semantic Aspects of Linguistic Acculturation. American Anthropologist, 69, 471–477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernini, M. (2023). Personification as Élanification: Agency Combustion and Narrative Layering in Worlding Perceived Relations. In S. Besser & F. Lysen (Eds.), Worlding the BraIn Neurocentrism, Cognition and the Challenge of the Arts and Humanities (pp. 003–128). Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (2010). Corpus-Based and Corpus-Driven Analyses of Language Variation and Use. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 159–191). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J. & Keller, D. (2019). Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 581–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., Staples, S. & Egbert, J. (2022). The Register-Functional Approach to Grammatical Complexity. Theoretical Foundation, Descriptive Research Findings, Application. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, E. (2006). Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blankfield, B. (2023). The Rhetoric of Prosopopoeia. Persuading in Others’ Voices. In J. Fahnestock & R. A. Harris (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Persuasion (pp. 246–260). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, M. W. (1963). A Grammatical Approach to Personification Allegory. Modern Philology, 60(3), 161–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bocharova, J. (2016). Personification Allegory and Embodied Cognition. In W. S. Melion & B. Ramakers (Eds.), Personification. Embodying Meaning and Emotion (pp. 43–69). Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bodó, Cs., Szabó, G. & Turai, R. K. (2019). Voices of masculinity: Men’s talk in Hungarian university dormitories. Discourse & Society, 30(4), 339–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar, M. & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2009). The (non-)metonymic use of place names in English, German, Hungarian and Croatian. In K-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar (pp. 229–258). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brdar-Szabó, R. & Brdar, M. (2021). Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis: Getting two (or more) targets for the price of one vehicle. In A. Soares da Silva (Ed.), Figurative Language — Intersubjectivity and Usage (pp. 175–212). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunner, A. & Steyer, K. (2009). A model for corpus-driven exploration and presentation of multi-word expressions. In J. Levická & R. Garabík (Eds.), NLP, Corpus Linguistics, Copus Based Grammar Research. Fifth International Conference Smolenice, Slovakia, 25–27 November 2009, Proceedings (pp. 54–64). Tribun.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, C. S. & Gonzálvez-García, F. (2014). Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caballero, R. (2017). Genre and metaphor. Use and variation across usage events. In E. Semino & Zs. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language (pp. 193–205). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, L. & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining Large and Small Corpora to Investigate Tuning Devices Around Metaphor in Spoken Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiarcos, C., Claus, B. & Grabski, M. (2011). Introduction: Salience in linguistics and beyond. In C. Chiarcos, B. Claus & M. Grabski (Eds.), Salience. Multidisciplinary Perspectives on its Function in Discourse (pp. 1–28). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claxton, R. P. & Murray, J. B. (1994). Object Subject Interchangeability: A symbolic interactionist model of materialism. ACR North American Advances, 21, 422–426.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, L., Brezina, V., Demjén, Zs., Semino, E. & Woods, A. (2023). Corpus linguistics and clinical psychology. Investigating personification in first-person accounts of voice-hearing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 28(1), 28–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crisp, P. (2003). Conceptual metaphor and its expressions. In J. Gavins & G. Steen (Eds.), Cognitive Poetics in Practice (pp. 99–113). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čulig Suknaić, J. (2025). Personification in Multimodal Advertising Discourse: A Case Study of the “Share a Coke” Campaign. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 12, 10–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). The grammar of linguistic metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 106–122). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, A., Littlemore, J. & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative Language, Genre and Register. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DiSalvo, C. & Gemperle, F. (2003). From Seduction to Fulfillment: The Use of Anthropomorphic Form in Design. In DPPI ’03: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 67–72). Association for Computer Machinery. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Divjak, D. (2012). Introduction. In D. Divjak & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Frequency Effects in Language Representation (pp. 1–10). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dominicy, M. (2019). Metaphor, Metonymy, and Personification in the Language of Robotics. In J-P. Laumond, E. Danblon & C. Pieters (Eds.), Wording Robotics. Discourses and Representations on Robotics (pp. 33–57). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G. (2011). Personification in discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures and communicative functions. Language and Literature, 20(2), 113–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G., Mulder, G. & Steen, G. J. (2011). Recognition of personifications in fiction by non-expert readers. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(2), 174–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drożdż, G. (2016). Theoretical, methodological, and practical problems in the study of lexicogrammar. In G. Drożdż (Ed.), Studies in Lexciogrammar. Theory and application (pp. 1–21). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupriez, B. (1991). A Dictionary of Literary Devices. Translated and adapted by Albert W. Halsall. University of Toronto Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckart de Castilho, R., Mújdricza-Maydt, É., Yimam, S. M., Hartmann, S., Gurevych, I., Frank, A. & Biemann, C. (2016). A Web-based Tool for the Integrated Annotation of Semantic and Syntactic Structures. In Proceedings of the LT4DH workshop at COLING 2016 (pp. 76–84). Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egg, M. & Kordoni, V. (2022). Metaphor annotation for German. In Calzolari, N., Béchet, F., Blache, P., Choukri, K., Cieri, C., Declerk, T., Goggi, S., Isahara, H., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Mazo, H., Odijk, J. & Piperidis, S. (Eds), LREC 2022, Thirteenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: Conference Proceedings (pp. 2556–2562). European Language Resources Association (ERLA). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). A corpus of metaphors as register markers. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023 (pp. 220–226). Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V. (2019). Cognitive Linguistics. A Complete Guide. Second edition. Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22(2), 133–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (2006) [1993]. Frame semantics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (pp. 373–400). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flach, S. (2021). Collostructions: An R implementation for the family of collostructional methods. Package version v.0.2.0, [URL]
Gibbons, A. & Whiteley, S. (2018). Contemporary Stylistics. Language, Cognition, Interpretation. Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th. (2006). Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: The many senses of to run. In S. Th. Gries & A. Stefanowitsch (Eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis (pp. 57–99). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Dispersion and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). Introduction: On the “architecture” of human language. In J. Webster (Ed.), On Language and Linguistics. Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. Vol. 3. (pp. 1–29). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, P. (2006). Metaphoricity is gradable. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-Basd Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 17–35). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional Structure. Word, 10(2–3), 146–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, R. A. (2023). The Tropes: Metaphor and Its Friends. In J. Fahnestock & R. A. Harris (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Persuasion (pp. 227–245). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imrényi, A. (2017). Form-meaning correspondences in multiple dimensions: The structure of Hungarian finite clauses. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 287–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Toward a cognitive dependency grammar of Hungarian. In K. Gerdes & S. Kahane (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling, SyntaxFest 2019) (pp. 81–88). Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Indig, B. (2017). Mosaic n-grams: Avoiding combinatorial explosion in corpus pattern mining for agglutinative languages. In Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics. (pp. 147–151). Adam Mickiewicz University. [URL]
Inding, B., Sass, B., Simon, E., Mittelholcz, I., Vadász, N. & Makrai, M. (2019). One format to rule them all — The emtsv pipeline for Hungarian. In Proceedings of the 13th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (pp. 155–165). Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Indig, B. & Bajzát, T. B. (2024). Compressing Noun Phrases to Discover Mental Constructions in CorporaACase Study for Auxiliaries in Hungarian. In M. Hämäläinen, F. Pirinen, M. Macias & M. C. Avila (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Uralic Languages (pp. 96–103). Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL]
Jaubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlý, P. & Suchomel, V. (2013). The TenTen Corpus Family. In 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL 2013. 125–127. [URL]
Kalivoda, Á., Malouf, R., Ackerman, F. & Sass, B. (2023). Building a dependency treebank from the Hungarian Gigaword Corpus. Poster presentation at the 15th International American Association for Corpus Linguistics Conference (AACL 2022). Available here: [URL]
Karikó, K. (2024). Breaking Through. My Life in Science. Crown.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A. (2009). Simple maths for keywords. [URL]
Klie, J-C., Bugert, M., Boullosa, B., de Castilho, R. E. & Gurevych, I. (2018). The INCEpTION Platform: Machine-Based and Knowledge-Oriented Interactive Annotation. In Proceedings of System Demonstrations of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2018) (pp. 5–9). Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2005a). Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). Túl a fogalmi metaforákon. [Beyond conceptual metaphors.] Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok [Studies in General Linguistics], 21, 71–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krennmayr, T. (2015). What Corpus Linguistics Can Tell Us About Metaphor Use in Newspaper Texts. Journalism Studies, 16(4), 530–546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Metaphor and part-of-speech. In E. Semino & Zs. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language (pp. 165–177). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulcsár Szabó, E. (2008). “magát mondja ami írva van”. Jegyzetek az újabb magyar líráról [“what is written speaks for itself.” Notes on the new Hungarian lyric]. Prae Irodalmi Folyóirat 35, 5–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006 [1993]. Conceptual metaphor. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings (pp. 185–238). Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapis, J. (2014). líra 2.0: közelítések a kortárs magyar költészethez. [lyric poetry 2.0: approaches to contemporary Hungarian poetry]. JAK+PRAE.HU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemmens, M. (2016). Cognitive semantics. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics (pp. 90–105). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, S. & Panther, K-U. (2014). ‘Author (date)’ construction in academic discourse. English Text Construction, 7(2), 215–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Long, D. (2018). Meaning Construction of Personification in Discourse Based on Conceptual Integration Theory. Studies in Literature and Language, 17(1), 21–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Low, G. (1999). „This paper thinks…”: Investigating the acceptability of the metaphor an essay is a person. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor (pp. 221–248). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luodonpää-Manni, M., Penttilä, E. & Viimaranta, J. (2017). Introduction. In M. Luodonpää-Manni, E. Penttilä & J. Viimaranta (Eds.), Empirical Approaches to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1–24). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKay, D. G. (1986). Prototypicality Among Metaphors: On the Relative Frequency of Personification and Spatial Metaphors in Literature Written for Children Versus Adults. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1(2), 87–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J. H. (2006). Corpus-based analysis of context effects on metaphor comprehension. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 214–236). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics. Method and Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Brezina, V. (2022). The Fundamental Principles of Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melion, W. S. & Ramakers, B. (Eds.) (2016). Personification. Embodying Meaning and Emotion. Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meurers, W. D. & Müller, S. (2009). Corpora and syntax. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Vol. 2. (pp. 920–933). Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2020). Analysing Frequency Lists. In M. Paquot & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 77–97). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T. & Reijnierse, W. G. (Eds.) (2019). Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the world. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nekrasova-Beker, T. & Becker, A. (2020). The use of lexical patterns in engineering: A corpus-based investigation of five sub-disciplines. In U. Römer, V. Cortes & E. Friginal (Eds.), Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing. Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise (pp. 227–254). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nowacki, A. (2017). Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. From the “Biostatistics and Epidemiology Lecture Series, Part 1”. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 84(9 Suppl 2), e20–e25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oravecz, Cs., Váradi, T. & Sass, B. (2014). The Hungarian Gigaword Corpus. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14) (pp. 1719–1723). European Language Resources Association (ELRA). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2007). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Corpus-informed Interpretation of Metaphor at the Register Level. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, K-U. & Thrornburg, L. L. (2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.236–263). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paxson, J. J. (2009). The poetics of personification. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peña-Cervel, M. S. & Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. R. (2022). Figuring out Figuration. A cognitive linguistic account. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philip, G. (2010). Metaphorical keyness in specialized corpora. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in Texts (pp. 185–203). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piata, A. & Pagán Cánovas, C. (2017). Powerful rhyme and sluttish time: A cross-linguistic study of time personification in poetic discourse. Language and Literature, 26(1), 18–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pusztai, F. (ed. in chief) (2003). Magyar értelmező kéziszótár. [The Concise Dictionary of Hungarian.] Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayson, P. & Potts, A. (2020). Analysing Keyword Lists. In M. Paquot & S. Th. Gries (Eds.), A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (pp. 119–139). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ren, Z. (2025). Personification Metaphors in Children’s Picturebooks about Nature: A Multimodal Cognitive Stylistic Study. International Research in Children’s Literature, 18(1), 88–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reppen, R. & Olson, S. B. (2020). Lexical bundles across disciplines: A look at consistency and variability. In U. Römer, V. Cortes & E. Friginal (Eds.), Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing. Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise (pp. 169–182). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reyes, A. (2013). Corporations are people: Emblematic scales of brand personification among Asian American youth. Language in Society, 42, 163–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohrer, T. (2007). Embodiment and Experientialism. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 25–47). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rounds, C. H. (2009). Hungarian. An Essential Grammar. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Römer, U., Cortes, V. & Friginal, E. (2020). Introduction: Advances in corpus-based research on academic writing. In U. Römer, V. Cortes & E. Friginal (Eds.), Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing. Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise (pp. 1–6). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rychlý, P. (2008). A Lexicographer-Friendly Association Score. In P. Sojka & A. Horák (Eds.), Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2008 (pp. 6–9). Masaryk University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sájter, L. (2008). Megszemélyesítés. [Personification]. In I. Szathmári (Ed. in chief), Alakzatlexikon. A retorikai és stilisztikai alakzatok kézikönyve [Encyclopedia of Figures. Handbook of Rhetoric and Stylistic Figures.] (pp. 383–388). Tinta Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sass, B. (2022). Principles of corpus querying: A discussion note. Acta Linguistica Academica, 69, 599–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2010). Problems in investigating keyness, or clearing the undergrowth and marking out trails… In M. Bondi & M. Scott, Mike (eds.), Keyness in Texts (pp. 44–57). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2017). Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 463–476). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sharifian, F. (2008). Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualisation and language. In R. M. Frank, R. Dirven, T. Ziemke & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, Language and Mind. Vol. 2. Sociocultural Situatedness (pp. 109–136). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, G. (2014). Embodiment and metaphorical meaning creation. In M. Kuźniak, A. Libura & M. Szawerna (Eds.), From Conceptual Metaphor Theory to Cognitive Ethnolinguistics. Patterns of Imagery in Language (pp. 249–266). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022a). Identification and analysis of personification in Hungarian: The PerSECorp project. In N. Calzolari, F. Béchet, P. Blache, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerk, S. Goggi, H. Isahara, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, J. Odijk & S. Piperidis (Eds), LREC 2022, Thirteenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation: Conference Proceedings (pp. 2730–2738). European Language Resources Association (ERLA). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2022b). Dogs know it, trees wait for it, and the wind snatches it: Verbal collexemes and semantic domains of noun + verb personifications in Hungarian. Studia Linguistica Hungarica, 34, 5–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Constructions, Collocations, and Patterns: Alternative Ways of Construction Identification in a Usage-based, Corpus-driven Theoretical Framework. In O. Rambow, F. Lareau, D. Dakota, K. Evang, S. Kübler, L. Levin, L. Grobol, F. Tyers, C. Bonial, H. T. Madabushi, N. Schneider & A. Zeldes (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Construction Grammars and NLP (CxGs+NLP, GURT/SyntaxFest 2023) (pp. 12–20). Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL Anthology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2024). The Register-Specific Distribution of Personification in Hungarian: A corpus-driven analysis. In G. Debanjan, M. Smaranda, A. Feldman, C. Tuhin & L. Emmy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Figurative Language Processing (FigLang 2024) (pp. 99–109). Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, G., Bajzát, T., Ballagó, J., Havasi, Zs., K. Molnár, E. & Szlávich, E. (2023). When MIPVU goes to no man’s land: a new language resource for hybrid, morpheme-based metaphor identification in Hungarian. Language Resources and Evaluation, 57, 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. (1996). The Search For Units of Meaning. Textus, 9, 75–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. (2013). Collostructional Analysis. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 290–306). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Corpus linguistics. A guide to the methodology. Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Texture. A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strugielska, A. (2014). The place of metaphor in a devolved cognitive linguistics. Metaphorik.de 25/2014. [URL]
Stubbs, M. (2014). Quantitative methods in literary linguistics. In P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics (pp. 46–62). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sullivan, K. (2009). Grammatical constructions in metaphoric language. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Dziwirek (Eds.), Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics (pp. 57–82). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2018). Ten Lectures on Cognitive Semantics. Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornborrow, J. & Wareing, S. (2005). Patterns in Language. an introductio into language and literary style. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. (2007). Conceptual integration. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 377–393). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twardzisz, P. (2013). The Language of Interstate Relations. In Search of Personification. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, H-H. (2015). A Blended Method for Generating Creative Product Concepts. In O. H. Hassan, S. Z. Abidin, R. Legino, R. Anwar & M. F. Kamaruzaman (Eds.), International Colloquium of Art and Design Education Research (i-CADER 2014) (pp. 311–322). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weir, A. (2021). Project Hail Mary. Del Rey.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue