In:Historical Linguistics 2023: Selected papers from the 26th International Conference on Historical Linguistics,Heidelberg, 4-8 September 2023
Edited by Jadranka Gvozdanović
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 371] 2026
► pp. 284–311
Voice morphology and valency orientation in Indo-European
Μorphosyntactic isoglosses and contact-induced changes
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
In the present study, we investigate the direction of
change of voice morphology in Indo-European (IE), as directly related to the
isoglosses of syncretic type of development of voice marking and of
antisyncretic type of development. According to our hypothesis, the
syncretic type of direction of change concerns IE languages that showed a
common direction of change following a model of an IE language or IE
languages; the antisyncretic type of IE languages is connected with the
influence of non-IE languages, which is evident in other aspects of grammar
that are related to voice, such as in the case system. We argue that these
isoglosses present different characteristics because they are the result of
different types of contact-induced changes.
Keywords: voice, valency, syncretism, antisyncretism, contact-induced change
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Main aims and theoretical background
- 1.2Ancient IE languages: Voice morphology and valency orientation
- 2.Syncretic vs antisyncretic type of development:
A preliminary hypothesis- 2.1Syncretic type of IE languages: The example of Greek
- 2.1.1An overview
- 2.1.2How wordlists reflect the diachrony of Greek
- 2.2Antisyncretic type of development
- 2.1Syncretic type of IE languages: The example of Greek
- 3.The hypothesis of contact-induced changes in the domain of voice and valency-changing categories: A preliminary evaluation
- 4.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes Abbreviations References Appendix
References (56)
Bahrt, Nicklas N. 2021. Voice
syncretism (Research on Comparative
Grammar). Berlin: Language Science Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 2006. Transitivity
pairs, markedness, and diachronic
stability. Linguistics 44.2. 303–318.
Delbrück, Berthold. 1897. Vergleichende
Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Zweiter
Teil. Strassburg: Trübner.
Dhongḍe, Ramesh Vaman & Kashi Wali. 2009. Marathi (London
Oriental and African Language Library
13). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ernout, Alfred. 1908–1909. Recherches
sur l’emploi du passif latin à l’époque
républicaine. Mémoires de la Société
de
Linguistique 15. 273–333.
Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. Valency
changes in the history of
English. Journal of Historical
Linguistics 1.1. 106–143.
George, Coulter H. 2005. Expressions
of agency in Ancient
Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grosse, Hermann. 1889. Beiträge
zur Syntax des griechischen Mediums und
Passivums. Dramburg: Druck von Th. Kämpf.
Grünthal, Riho & Johanna Nichols. 2016. Transitivizing-detransitivizing
typology and language family
history. Lingua
Posnaniensis 58.2. 11–31.
Harðarson, Jón Axel. 1998. Mit
dem Suffix -eh1- bzw. -(e)h1-i̯e/o- gebildete
Verbalstämme im
Indogermanischen. In Wolfgang Meid (ed.), Sprache
und Kultur der Indogermanen: Akten der X. Fachtagung der
Indogermanischen
Gesellschaft, Innsbruck, 22.–28. September
1996 (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur
Sprachwissenschaft
93), 323–339. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More
on the typology of inchoative/causative verb
alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), Causatives
and
transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Haspelmath, Martin & Thomas Müller-Bardey. 2004. Valency
change. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan (eds), Morphology:
A handbook on inflection and word
formation. Vol. 2
ed., 1130–1145. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2005. Language
contact and grammatical
change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Inglese, Guglielmo. 2021. Anticausativization
and basic valency orientation in
Latin. In Silvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (eds), Valency
over time: diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency
orientation, 133–168. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Jankuhn, Harald. 1969. Die
passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache
Homers. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Janse, Mark. 2002. Aspects
of bilingualism in the history of the Greek
language. In J. N. Adams, Mark Janse & Simon Swain (eds), Bilingualism
in ancient society: Language contact and the written
text, 332–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kulikov, Leonid. 2007. The
reflexive pronouns in Vedic: A diachronic and typological
perspective. Lingua 117.8. 1412–1433.
. 2009. Valency-changing
categories in Indo-Aryan and Indo-European: A diachronic typological
portrait of Vedic
Sanskrit. In Anju Saxena & Åke Viberg (eds), Multilingualism:
Proceedings of the 23rd Scandinavian conference of
linguistics, 75–92. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet.
. 2011. Voice
typology. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of linguistic
typology, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2011
[2012]. The Proto-Indo-European case
system and its reflexes in a diachronic typological perspective:
Evidence for the linguistic prehistory of
Eurasia. Rivista degli studi
orientali 84. 289–309.
. 2014a. The
decline of labile syntax in Old Indo-Aryan: A diachronic typological
perspective. Linguistics 52.4. 1139–1165.
. 2014b. Grammaticalization
of reciprocal pronouns in Indo-Aryan: Evidence from Sanskrit and
Indo-European for a diachronic typology of reciprocal
constructions. Journal of South Asian
Languages and
Linguistics 1.2. 117–156.
. 2014c. Causative
formation. In: Georgios K. Giannakis et al. (eds), Encyclopedia
of Ancient Greek language and
linguistics, 275–277. Leiden: Brill.
Kulikov, Leonid & Nikolaos Lavidas. 2013. Reconstructing
passive and voice in
Proto-Indo-European. Journal of
Historical
Linguistics 3.1. 98–121. [Reprinted
in: Leonid Kulikov & Nikolaos Lavidas (eds), Proto-Indo-European
syntax and its
development, 101–124. Amsterdam: Benjamins 2015].
Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2009. Transitivity
alternations in diachrony. Changes in argument structure and voice
morphology. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lavidas, Nikolaos, Georgia Fotiadou & Ianthi Maria Tsimpli. 2012. Active
vs. nonactive voice in the Greek diachrony: Real or apparent
optionality in the use of voice
morphology. In Zoe Gavriilidou, Angeliki Efthymiou, Evangelia Thomadaki & Penelope Kambakis-Vougiouklis (eds.) Selected
Papers of the 10th International Conference on Greek
Linguistics, 390–400. Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.
Luraghi, Silvia. 2010. The
extension of the transitive construction in Ancient
Greek. Acta Linguistics
Hafniensia 42 (1), 60–74.
. 2012. Basic
valency orientation and the middle voice in
Hittite. Studies in
Language 36.1. 1–32.
Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining
a linguistic area: South
Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McWhorter, John H. 2002. What
happened to
English? Diachronica 19.2. 217–272.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1969. Nekotorye
verojatnostnye universalii v glagol’nom
slovoobrazovanii. In Ivan F. Vardul’ (ed.), Jazykovye universalii i lingvističeskaja
tipologija [Language
Universals and Linguistic
Typology], 106–114. Moscow: Nauka.
Nichols, Johanna. 1982. Ingush
transitivization and
detransitivization. Berkeley
Linguistics
Society. 8. 445–462.
. 1993. Transitive
and causative in the Slavic lexicon: Evidence from
Russian. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives
and
transitivity, 69–86. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 2006. Stance
verbs and the linguistic Europeanization of the
Slavs. Paper read at
the Slavic Linguistics Society Inaugural
Meeting.
. 2007. Lexical
valence typology project: Instructions for elicitation of
causative-noncausative verb pairs. [URL]
. 2014. Derivational
paradigms in diachrony and
comparison. In Martine Robbeets & Walter Bisang (eds.), Paradigm
change in the Transeurasian languages and
beyond, 61–88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 2017. Realization
of the causative alternation: Revised wordlist and
examples. 〈[URL]〉
. 2018. Non-linguistic
conditions for causativization as a linguistic
attractor. Frontiers in
Psychology 8. 2356.
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing
and detransitivizing
languages. Linguistic
Typology 8.2. 149–211.
Plank, Frans & Aditi Lahiri. 2015. Macroscopic
and microscopic typology: Basic valence orientation, more
pertinacious than meets the naked
eye. Linguistic
Typology 19.1. 1–54.
Sausa, Eleonora. 2016. Basic
valency orientation in Homeric
Greek. Folia Linguistica
Historica 37.1. 205–238.
Southworth, Franklin C. 1979. Lexical
evidence for early contacts between Indo-Aryan and
Dravidian. In Madhav M. Deshpande (ed.) Aryan
and non-Aryan in India (Michigan papers on
South and Southeast Asia
14), 191–233. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, The University of Michigan.
Subbarao, Karumuri V. & Anju Saxena. 1987. Reflexives
and reciprocals in Dravidian. Studies
in the Linguistic
Sciences 17.1. 121–135.
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic
typology: Social determinants of linguistic
complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van der Auwera, Johan (ed.). 1998. Adverbial
constructions in the languages of
Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1941. The
relation of habitual thought and behavior to
language. In Leslie Spier (ed.), Language,
culture, and personality: Essays in memory of Edward
Sapir, 75–93. Menasha, Wis.: Sapir Memorial Publication Fund. [Re-printed
in Whorf (1956), Language,
thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee
Whorf, 134–159. Ed.
by John B. Carroll, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]
